[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1784315137767.jpg (295 KB, 1260x1022)
295 KB JPG
Why do chuds try to absolve the Byzantines of their share of the blame for the Fourth Crusade?

The Byzantines involved the Crusaders in their palace intrigue, failed to pay them after making lofty promises in exchange for their retaking the city from the usurper Alexios III; then they brutally murdered Alexios IV, who was well-liked by the crusade leaders and trying to levy the funds to pay them off.

It was only after understanding that they wouldn't be paid anymore, and with the justification that the Byzantines had murdered their rightful lord, that the crusaders attacked the city.
>>
it's protdogs playing buddybuddy with orthodogs to make catholics look bad



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.