If its something that invades your body and feeds off you, doesn't that count as horror?
>>18598962No.
>>18598962When you really think about it, mammals are abominations.
>>18598962Is taking a shit body horror
Incels here don't have to worry about it cuz they are not getting anyone pregnant
>>18598962It's actually body bliss
>>18598965>>18598967>>18598979What about pseudo-Futa?
Pregnancy is a choice and body horror usually isn't giving you a choice.
>>18598979yes absolutely>>18598962well women sure act like it is
>>18598962>If its something that invades your body and feeds off you, doesn't that count as horror?This is what chronic exposure to toxins does to a human female's brain...
>>18598962If you're a misanthrope with a strange pathology surrounding the body, perhaps.To a normal person, no.If someone does feel that way, it suggests they probably weren't mature enough to be having procreative sex.
>>18599078t. moid
>>18599451>t. ywnboid
>>18599439>If someone does feel that way, it suggests they probably weren't mature enough to be having procreative sex.If someone feels that way, it suggests she should probably be sterilized. Because that sort WILL get an unplanned pregnancy and WILL procrastinate on the abortion until the last moment.
>>18598962For faggots maybe. For the rest of us, it’s >>18599078Pic related >>18599280>t. Todd AkinBased attitude but the ovum don’t care if the sperm entered you consensually or not.>>18599321Every woman should become pregnant at least once, preferably more than once, change my mind.
>>18600117Based Dixilish
>>18599452>t. degeneratroon
>>18598962>AHHHH IM GESTATING A FETUS, IM GOING INSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANE
No, but Ridley Scott absolutely did insert his abortion fetish into his relatively mediocre filmography.Of course, this constitutes simple conditioning at audience expense too.Executives of which, were indeed fully on board with.The more you know.
I honestly wish anti-natalists could do everyone a favour and just commit collective suicide.
>>18601775If Blade Runner hadn't originally been a very good book Scott would have absolutely floundered.As it stands though, even what he managed to direct of it in the end were lacking a certain jene sais quoi.Though I'm not going to say it's a bad film. It is good, and that is primarily because of the brilliant actors and effects.
>>18598962It is kind of grotesque when you think about it. This thing feeds off your blood and fluids while nesting inside you. It hijacks your body causing you to gain weight, often so much that it scars huge sections of your skin. The process is so often lethal that the survival rate of the woman is used as a metric for quality of life and development. I get that we need to do this to continue our species, but it is rather horrifying.
>>18601809No, it's a thing of beauty.Those "scars" are proof.
>>18601865Hey. I’ve got an idea. Ask around and see how many of your friends want their girlfriends to be fatter, with saggier tits, more cellulite, a sagging gut, and stretch marks. Unless you’re embracing the body positivity movement. Which at least does make you less of a hypocrite I suppose.
>>18599321>well women sure act like it iswhat kind of women live around you? get away from there.
>>18598962its actually beautiful, but faggots like you wouldnt know
>>18602297>Gaining muscle gives you stretchmarks>Therefore gaining muscle is bad because it makes you slightly uglier.You're a retarded child.The traits you are describing are only ugly to men looking for a woman to breed with because they indicate the woman has already bred. On their own there is nothing objectively negative about those traits, and they actually become positive traits when found in a wife because they indicate the woman's maternal inclinations. They signal a woman who has committed on her fundamental biology to ensuring the survival of your child, something which is deeply desirable on an instinctual level to men.
>>18603299Honkys should not reproduce
>>18598962>its something that invadesIt's your own child, you retard.
>>18598962Zoomer thread. But to answer your question, no it isn't. Every single living thing has to sacrifice to reproduce, whether it's laying an egg or producing seeds or gestating a worthless faggot like (You).
>>18598962You’re the horror, monkey
>>18598962During pregnancy, a woman's estrogen level surges to 10000x the normal level. The fetus donates stem cells to repair her organs (proof: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3365532/) If they didn't, mom wouldn't survive from the overload to her heart.Would you want to walk around with hormone levels so high that you scream at someone for not bringing you the right food that you're craving? You would flat out not be able to do manly things like that. The brain also loses about 25% of its volume (its regained later). If you like being rational, yes pregnancy is body horror.
>>18603941>Would you want to walk around with hormone levels so high that you scream at someone for not bringing you the right food that you're craving?She’s also horny af and I get to cockslam her whenever I want. And that matters more.t. nailed pregnant classmate harder than Christ on the cross
>>18603682You’re the idiot if you think sagging breasts are typically considered attractive. Cellulite and stretch marks are, outside of fetish communities not considered attractive. You can try to justify it all you like, but those are the simple realities. Men regularly leave women once they’re too old and fat after having children. Still, retard or not at least you’re embracing body positivity. So there’s that.
>>18602301Feminists
>>18603723Bix nood
What makes it horror is the birth part, the pregnancy is just the prelude. Ask yourself this question:Why is birth never depicted DIRECTLY? It's always hidden behind a blanket or off screen. It's because it is fucking body horror, so OP is partially correct. No that doesn't make pregnancy bad or something, but it's still body horror when it comes to the finale. Some men fucking faint at the sight of the baby coming out. If it's not body horror, what the fuck do you consider body horror?
>>18604605>Why is birth never depicted DIRECTLYCause that would require showing a vagina and society has decided even showing it makes a peice of work now porn.
>>18604641We are just fine with showing vaginas in pornography and softcore and films too. Retarded response. You'll be hard pressed to find something equivalent of a birth, aside from medical context. It's basically treated as equivalent to literal gore
