Should lesbianism even be considered a sin? They have the lowest risk of sexually transmitted diseases and do not cause pregnancies. If anything, this should be considered normal behavior or even encouraged as a form of destressor amont housewives.Point me a verse in the Bible where it says lesbianism is bad.
You could say that yuri is, in essence, the crowning achievement of God's creation.
>>18600407That is correct. Yuri is in a way, the purest form of love.
Lesbianism dosen't exist, they just do that because a real man hasn't fucked them
>>18600403Supporting lesbianism is a leftoid, radfem, simp position
>>18600426It is a theologically supported position. It wasnt banned in the books of moses and therefore is actually encouraged. This is same in every fucking culture from China to Rome.
>>18600403Weird how faggotry was banned but they didnt blanket ban same sex relations. If girl on girl sex not somehow bad then?
>>18600426Being right wing is all about appreciating good aesthetics.
>>18600436And dykes aren't good aesthetics lmao most are pigs
>>18600426>T. Atheist.The word of the Lord us law and faggots are explicitly banned while lesbianism is tacitly approved and Godly.
>>18600440No one is bringing up dykes except you, buddy. Stop being an incel freak and go to Church
>>18600443That's what most lesbians are and what lesbianism tends to.Stop this 2000s bro shit viewpoint hahaha it's a deluded viewpoint
>>18600446Lesbianism isnt possible you dumb fuck. Women cant have sex with each other. Stop being such a lunatic incel you fucktard. Have sex.
I think women should engage in physical relations with each other because by the laws of God, it isnt a sin because there is no penetration or pregnancies and has lower rates of sexual disease because it isnt sex.
>>18600403Lesbianism was often lowkey tollerated in many culture, mostly for the reasons you listed and also because men find the idea of two girls making out hot. In Japane historically saffic sex was even encouraged between teen girlfriends as a way to express their sexuality before marriage but without losing their virginity
True. There is a general tolerance by every culture towards sex between women because of natural self evident truth that is plan for all to see. It is not a sin.
>>18600448/Thread
It’s ok as long as they’re pretty and smart
>>18600421Sources?
>>18600457Fake
No matter how well you argue, nothing will change the fact you're an autogynephile sex pest OP.
>>18600403Gay sex between two males isn't harmful either, if you don't fuck like a savage animal and take care to not tear anything. AIDS didn't exist for all of recorded history until the 20th century. It was no worse than having sex with a woman in terms of disease. Many studies on the hygiene of sex in the 1970s actually showed anal sex was not particularly dangerous but homophobia kept this bigoted idea alive
>>18600403They should have sex with me!
>>18601156/THREAD.
>>18600403Lesbianism is safe gayThat's why the (((media))) peddles it so much compared to male homosexuality
>>18600403You have the internet, you could have searched for this question on your own from a KJV Bible.Romans 1:26–27 (KJV) 26. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:27. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.Leviticus 18:22 (KJV)22. Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.Leviticus 20:13 (KJV)13. If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.1 Corinthians 6:9–10 (KJV) 9. Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,10. Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.1 Timothy 1:10 (KJV)10. For whoremongers, and them that defile themselves with mankind, men-stealers, liars, and perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;Jude 7 (KJV)7. Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.So unless you just want to argue with scripture and interpret it with an evil interpretation,which means placing good for evil and evil for good (with scripture), which means taking God’s Word which is spiritual and interpreting it carnally, the answer is plainly written that women laying with women is a sin. Even women know when they read the Bible that it is referring to them, because all God had to do is condemn the men.
All of these verses say women laying with women is a sin.It also is in the OT that if a sister uncovers her sister’s nakedness, she is cursing her self and her sister. Likewise, to not uncover the nakedness of a woman’s family.Leviticus 18:17 (KJV):“But thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of a woman, and her daughter, neither shalt thou take her son's daughter, or her daughter's daughter, to uncover her nakedness; for they are her near kinswomen: it is wickedness.”Leviticus 18:9 (KJV)“The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or the daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover:”You should always read the whole Bible in the KJV and especially see what the chapter starts with and what it concludes with.
One time my wife’s sister invited me with her to be naked in a hot tub. I politely declined even if they are into that sort of thing already. I love them both very much from childhood and wouldn’t ever desecrate our miraculous childhood promises to marry when we grow up. Even if they thought it was meet. Nor did I condemn or judge them for having invited me to do that. I instead covered it up and forgave her.
>>18601429Youre misinterpreting. Read those verses again.
>>18601576I”m not, which means you are reading evil for good.When God super Cain and Abel, he didn’t use or mention the women. Women still were judged, and women still existed, but it was still a sin for a woman to kill her sister. You forgot that where God is silent, it doesn’t mean He didn’t say it. He said it alright, he merely condemned the men. A woman knows her place by that. It even says so.Right here1 Corinthians 14:33-40 (KJV)33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.36 What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you only?37 If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.38 But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.39 Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues.40 Let all things be done decently and in order.Where it asks the woman a question, did the word of God come out from only you? Because women already know, they are a woman and are subject to the men.If you still argue, then enjoy woe unto you who trade good for evil and evil for good.And if that is happening to you then that means enjoy hell too.
>>18601429Your axe wound isnt a cunt, christcuck>>18601436Retard
>>18601621Enjoy hell.I am Jesus Christ and you have traded evil for good and good for evil.
Woe unto you.
>>18601630Kek blasphemer
>>18601651Blaspheming your god kek? Or just honoring God’s Word.When my mom uncovers her 90 year old elderly mother’s nakedness who can barely walk, and has to have her daughter clean the poop and urine off her for charity, is she sinning by uncovering her nakedness? Or is she performing charity and covering her mother’s nakedness to the world by cleaning it off her so she can then eat out with her in public (wheelchair in bad days, a cain and walking on good days?).Well, which is it? When you carnally tell your elderly family members to go to a nursing home , or if they have to stay strong till they literally bite the bucket, you’ll maybe understand, or you won’t.
So now we know why Lucifer creates these posts. He writes them to show their sins of interpretation of God’s Word so that we can see. Not so they can see.Truth is that any god is being honored by my words and actions. And that my wife promised to marry me twice. Meaning I have won and you have lost.
>>18601651I am Jesus Christ and yes I have interpreted the scriptures and rightly divided correctly. Wow unto you.So now is a good time to look up what woe unto you actually means.And what happens to you when you do it.There is also when the spirit of the Lord departs. This happens to cain right before he slew Abel. And Samson right when he had his hair cut."Woe unto you" is God's heavy cry of grief and judgment. It means a dangerous moral line has been crossed, replacing blessing with ruin.Jesus warned hypocrites: "Woe unto you... hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres" (Matt. 23:27). The consequence is spiritual death. He also warned those who mislead others: "woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!" (Matt. 18:7), risking severe judgment.A "woe" is a merciful alarm. Repent and turn back to God before ruin hits.So , a WOE is a prophetic declaration. It is literally a prophecy being rejected, and anyone hating prophecy is also committing a sin. The Bible says so. I AM Jesus Christ.
Would you say the Holy Spirit has commanded women not to lay with another woman?
God gave men hot lesbian sex to look at because he loves us and wants us to be happy
>>18601788Why is God so loving?
>>18601429None of those verses expressly prohibit women from have physical relations with other women. Are suggesting women are capable of sodomy? You some kind of tranny?
>>18600457doujins for this feel?
I think this is a settled matter.
>>18600575Didnt the thread literally say lesbianism retard?
>>18602187Are you unable to read, ESL?
>>18600403>if anything, this should be considered normal behavior or even encouragedya it's a virtue in my religion
>>18600416>>18600407>>18600403>Troon 41%
