[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_7787.jpg (249 KB, 800x979)
249 KB JPG
Unironically there’s evidence to suggest that modern atheism is a byproduct of Christianity and if Europe remained pagan, atheism wouldn’t exist (at least in a recognizable form).
>>
>>18601850
Talk about it, nigger. Don't leave us hanging.
>>
>>18601850
youre right for the wrong reasons
Atheism exists in the west because both their versions of Christianity are heretical and false
>>
>>18601861
In paganism, the entirely world was seen as sacred, there was no stark division between creator and creation because pagan religions were basically pantheist. Christianity desacralized nature by separating the creator from creation, which inevitably laid the groundwork for atheistic materialism. A scientific revolution might have still occurred in pagan Europe, but a pantheist worldview would prevent the development of atheistic materialism.

Paganism was also pluralistic and orthopraxic as they cared more about the right practice than the right belief (they weren’t necessarily tolerant, but cases of religious persecution were done for political or social reasons, not theological ones). Skeptics existed in the ancient world sure, but they never went as far as to deny the existence of the gods or reject all religious practices as even Epicurus didn’t actually deny the existence of the gods (instead he argued they were non-interventionist beings who neither demanded worship nor answered prayer). When a Greek traveled to Egypt, they didn’t try to convert the Egyptians but instead translated the Egyptian gods into their own framework of gods (e.g. Thoth is just Hermes). Christianity however believes in an exclusivist framework of “only my god is real, all other gods are false gods or demons.” Because of this, Christianity created a culture of doctrinal correctness regarding metaphysics and atheists inherited that mentality, they simply took it to its logical conclusion by applying the “false god” label to the Christian god himself.

Modern atheists also inherit many of their social views from Christianity, particularly the Christian concept of Imago Dei (the belief all men were created equal under god). Pagan societies meanwhile were far more hierarchal and accepted the belief that some men were simply better than others. Atheists kept the morality of Christianity, they simply got rid of the metaphysics.
>>
>>18601850
Atheism in ancient greece was
>Yeah I believe the gods are real. I just don't actively worship any.
>>
>>18601850
Modern European atheists act just like pagans. They are superstitious and obsessed with rituals.
>>
>>18601850
Yes, that is correct.
Atheis, is a byproduct of Christianity and its tolerance towards other's beliefs, even the ones that hate it

Atheists always take this protection for granted but in reality, their beliefs will get them killed outside of Christian protection

Atheism is ILLEGAL in pagan societies as that is seen as treason and a blasphemy against the gods. Christians routinely got killed under the accusations of atheism, especially during times of plague and famine

Atheists only exists for as long as Christianity tolerates and protects them
>>
>>18601914
Christianity desacralized nature because nature isn't "sacred" unless you're infantile or retarded, in the sense that there is no Goddess living in the swamp or the river

You cannot function as a civilized society with such beliefs. What happens if you decide you want to drain the swamp or dam the river? Are the pagan priests going to stop you? Does the Goddess disappear?

>A scientific revolution might have still occurred in pagan Europe, but a pantheist worldview would prevent the development of atheistic materialism.
So your argument is that we wouldn't be "materialist", i.e., obsessed with wealth, worldly pleasure, and opulence if we were pagan. You would have to completely ignore ancient Rome and the Norsemen and every other gold-obsessed materialist pagan society to believe this.
If we were still pagan, would we still believe gold coins pour out of the eyes of the Goddesses when they're sad, or would we leave that part out?
Materialism as you mean it is entirely uncoupled from religion. You can be a Puritan and strip your Church of all worldly materialist icons and gold, or you can be the Borgias and fill the Vatican with chests of emeralds and diamonds and prostitutes.

> When a Greek traveled to Egypt, they didn’t try to convert the Egyptians but instead translated the Egyptian gods into their own framework of gods (e.g. Thoth is just Hermes). Christianity however believes in an exclusivist framework of “only my god is real, all other gods are false gods or demons.” Because of this, Christianity created a culture of doctrinal correctness regarding metaphysics and atheists inherited that mentality, they simply took it to its logical conclusion by applying the “false god” label to the Christian god himself.
Yes, Christians believe in right and wrong, good and evil, while pagans don't believe anything, it's ok to be gay and do crime and be pagan. This is another way pagans are identical to modern atheists.
>>
>>18601935
Pagans probably had to kill atheists because the atheists wanted to build a bridge over a river but the faggot pagan priests insisted there was a djinn living in the river who wouldn't like it.
>>
File: luce gun 1.jpg (74 KB, 850x1046)
74 KB JPG
>>18601937
That is rich when the Ganges is the holiest river for Hindus, and yet it is treated like a sewage drain.

>If we were still pagan, would we still believe gold coins pour out of the eyes of the Goddesses when they're sad, or would we leave that part out?
Scientific method was created by the Franciscans to discourage people from practicing magic

Christianity established entire Orders that promotes a natural philosophy and aims to provide medical assistance using nothing but prayers and materials (ie Order of Lazarus and Knights Hospitallers)

The word Hospital itself came from the Hospitallers which was named after their founding place. After the Muslims kicked them out, they returned to Europe and spread their medical expertise.
To call a place a Hospital is to imply that it is under the direct and indirect influence of the Hospitallers

Pagan belief in magic would have kept humans locked under the belief that gladiator sweat is a panacea
>>
>>18601935
>Atheism is ILLEGAL in pagan societies as that is seen as treason and a blasphemy against the gods
And that was a good thing, nobody who denies the gods should be considered a sane human being. Even Plato argued such on his Republic.
>>
>>18601950
Hospitals already existed in Ancient Greece, look up the Asclepieia and a certain man by the name of Hippocrates. Porphyry was right, you do have a tendency to claim credit for shit you had no real involvement in.
>>
does anybody actually believe that atheists weren't always a thing? like of fucking course some people in the past lied about being religious; it was often social suicide to not support the state-sanctioned faith, if not outright illegal. it still is in many places.
>>
>>18601950
>That is rich when the Ganges is the holiest river for Hindus, and yet it is treated like a sewage drain.
So your argument for paganism is that it would be cool and chill because no one would actually respect it and they'd shit in the rivers they think are inhabited by a God?
>>
>>18601850
The God is not desperate for worshippers like the pagan gods are who are worship whores and accept anyone as long as they keep feeding them sacrifices and offerings. They're just hungry. But if God were hungry he would need to tell you because the whole world is his and everything in it.
>>
>>18601850
Tbqh every single -ism since the enlightenment and renaissance is just a heresy of Christianity. Normies who don’t know ball are just confused because enlightenment people laid hard into the superficial pagan LARP. There’s a direct line from all modern western ideologies and beliefs back to medieval scholasticism.
>>
>>18602098
Nope, you only think that because you are a troglodyte who views the gods from the lens of a Marvel consoomer (including of course Jeebus himself).
Deities are supreme immortal entities existing in higher planes. Humans attach themselves to the deities that have created them, and draw down power from them, freely shared. But just because humans lose connection with these deities and fail to draw power from them any longer, does not influence these deities the least bit.
The gods are doing just as well today as they were in the past. It is humans that are doing worse. Followers of the all too human cult of Jeebus may beat their chests in triumph but all that has been achieved is a slump to base ignorance. Much ancient wisdom has been lost and destroyed, which could have been used to help everyone today. Oh well. Each man for himself now.
>>
File: luce llook.png (189 KB, 285x312)
189 KB PNG
>>18601964
*Modern Hospitals
The concept of a centralized medical facility came as a result of the Hospitallers providing medical aid to pilgrims, refugees, and orphans

P.S
Asclepieia maybe a hospital but not a modern one by the fact that they relied on magical treatments like sleeping on sacred rooms, invocation through performances, and of course, trinkets and dream readings

Modern medicine was a result of Christians imposing a ban on magic
>>
>>18601850
>atheism doesn't exist outside of Europe.
What history books do you read?

>>18602160
Asclepieia was also focused on the wealthy and powerful. Different ethic of treatment.
>>
>>18602116
"All too human" = Nietzschean babble for excusing sodomy, degeneracy, faggotry, and consoomerism. In a pagan paradise all these would be celebrated as no better or worse than any other lifestyle. "What's your problem with gays man, they just want to be left alone. You're probably a closet homo projecting". This is the numinous ancient wisdom of the pagans we've lost.
Marvel movies can feature the pagan gods as heroes and make a billion dollars selling to ZOGGED audiences because the pagan gods are inoffensive, because they are inclusive and universalist. Thor would strike a bigoted frost giant with his hammer but he'd never strike a trans black woman.
>>
>>18601850
>>18601861
>>18601914
>>18601937
>>18601950

Different Anon wandering into this thread: pic related, Keith Thomas, "Religion And The Decline Of Magic" covers this exact historical topic of how the Protestant Reformation movement directly lead to something resembling Agnosticism/Atheism.

I can't summarize the entire process (It's a 1300 page book. I read it a couple summers ago, it's actually really, really, good), but the basic premise was: translations of the Bible, lead to growing Christian literacy, which lead to people becoming naturally curious, skeptical, and entering into a kind of vaguely scientific culture of determining what God was and wasn't directly responsible for, which in turn lead to "well if God doesn't personally do these things, what causes them?", and so on and so forth.
>>
>>18602251
I don't know, do you really buy that? Protestants were basically the last holdout of open, devout faith in the West. I don't want to wade into an argument over Evangelical Christianity and Zionism and all that, but as late as 2010 (!!!) belief in God in America was held by 92% of the population.

You may dismiss this as insincere, but then what are we to make of the Catholic countries held to be more devout because everyone still goes to Mass as a matter of routine without ever picking up a Bible?

Protestant countries repeatedly went through Great Awakenings for centuries after the reformation, countless great figures of science and exploration have been devout Protestants, not just Isaac Newton and James Clark Maxwell.

The harbringer of mass atheism seems to me to just be modernity, tracing it back to the reformation sounds to me just like a way for a Catholic to reassure himself.

A country like Italy where abortion and gay marriage are practically illegal doesn't seem to me like a religious nation. It seems like a modern secular nation with a 1.0 birthrate where the people just temperamentally happen to disagree with gay marriage and abortion.
>>
>>18601914
Greco-Roman conceptions of religion were envolving to be more akin to those of Judaism and Christianity than the opposite, though. I don't think the general syncretic paganism of 0 CE was pantheistic, and it certainly wasn't in 200 CE.
>>
File: 1736605024061384.png (222 KB, 549x506)
222 KB PNG
>>18602265
You may want to take a second look at that

The Big Bang was made by a Catholic Priest; Einstein hated it, calling it a creationist propaganda

Protestants cannot tell the age of the Earth
>>
>>18601850
Greek philosophy already embraced Atheism, but yes, modern Atheism is a Protestant sect. They're Calvinists, to be specific.
>>
>>18601914
>there was no stark division between creator and creation because pagan religions were basically pantheist
Platonism, dvaita vedanta, and bathala worship in the phillipines. You can't generalize thousands of religions across millenia and different cultures.
>Christianity desacralized nature by separating the creator from creation,
If anything it's the opposite, the incarnation of the absolute was proto-orthodox christianity's main distinguishing factor from contemporary monotheistic pagan philosophies and its other christian competitors.
>they cared more about the right practice than the right belief
Read literally any abhidhamma sutta attacking the other schools of ancient buddhism, or buddhists mocking hindus for their pointless worship of brahma, or any ancient greek dialogue. The intellectual elite were deeply invested in finding the truth, even if they didn't brutally murder each other over it, much like how our intellectual elite are today
>>
File: 224438.png (66 KB, 354x447)
66 KB PNG
>>18602281
catholic theologians believed in a literal interpretation of genesis until they were humiliated by scientific developments into handwaving it away as mostly allegorical
>>
>>18602335
moldbuggery gone mainstream
>>
Can I get some rule 34 of Zeus swan rape? My form of pagan worship exclusively takes the form of masturbation.
>>
>>18601850
Atheistic philosophy was already developed in India centuries before Christianity. White people are really clueless.
>>
>>18602391
Neoplatonism is pantheist you retard. Have you ever read Iamblichus?
Also, India is irrelevant to this. We are talking about Europe
>>
>>18602427
I hate him so much bros
>>
>>18602395
This makes them seethe.
>>
>>18601850
Nah, there's ample evidence that in the final centuries of pagan dominance, many educated people stopped believing in the gods in a traditional sense and simply adhered to their religion out of custom and obligation. Now you could argue that's one reason it was ripe to replaced by something else, but supposing it wasn't replaced, it seems likely atheism would've become an acceptable idea considering the "gods" championed by philosophers were so far removed in both essence and function from those of the masses. Epicureans got especially close to being outright atheists similar to modern ones. One of Christianity's big achievements imo (and Jews had already been working on this) was so unite these hifalutin philosophical concepts from Platonism etc. to their personal deity Yahweh, so if anything Christianity might have prolonged the life of theism in the west by doing that
>>
>>18603671
Neoplatonism isn't pantheist retard. Have you ever read plotinus? The One is an unchanging, unthinking transcendent thing that is ontologically distinct from reality and separated through a hierarchy of emanations
Also india, and every other part of the world is relevant to this, considering that you need to explain what specifically created the conditions for modern monistic atheism. If those conditions you listed existed in india, why were their atheists dualists that accepted the existence of souls and the supernatural
>>
>>18601935
>>18601941
This but unironically. You cannot do scientific experiments if nature is sacred or has capricious demons that are going to fuck up your experiments. It is basically luck that Christianity had enough correct ontological underpinnings to lead cleanly to the correct view of metaphysics (secularism).
Also Atheism/skepticism has existed in Greece/Rome before Christians got there.
>>
>>18604008
>>18601964
>>
>>18604009
>>18601950
Here is the chain of science you can read Shapin Scientific Revolution to figure it out, handmaiden.
the chain is necessitarian Aristotelianism -> voluntarist critique (contingency of creation) -> deduction loses authority as a route to knowledge of nature -> empirical/experimental method becomes not just useful but epistemically necessary -> Baconian induction
>>
>>18604009
Hospitals existed in the Mesolithic, idiot. Hunter Gatherers could do brain surgery, they'd drill a hole in the skull to relieve pressure then sow up the wound.

If animism and superstition don't get in the way of science, then why even have them in the first place? If your belief that lightning is supernatural and the work of the gods doesn't in any way contradict the ability of scientists to create lightning with a spark gap, then what's even the point of the belief? Aren't you just an atheist?
>>
People are attracted to paganism because it is indigenous and fun and anti-Christian. That's it.

For every pagan whose paganism informs his morality and approach to life and society, there are ten hundred like >>18604009 whose paganism is a result of reading anti-Christian polemics written by pagans. If Christianity disappeared tomorrow, they would put up pagan art and symbolism, but besides that, they would be universalist atheists. Their morality would not extend beyond live and let live.
>>
>point out that science predates christianity and that christians falsely claim credit
>seething ensues
No wonder christians destroyed so many historical records. The truth is poison to their religion.
>>
>>18604056
So pagan society would have everything awesome and nothing bad, and that's why christianity was bad.
>>
>>18604130
At this rate I won't be surprised to see you retards a year or two from now screeching at someone for telling you that christians didn't invent marriage, agriculture, or the written word.
>>
>>18601850
so, if things were different, then things would be different?
>>
>>18604147
if we were pagan everything would be awesome and nothing would be bad. we wouldn't have jewish morality and we'd be superstitious and animist again.
>>
that cool thing? that's pagan. that bad thing? that's not pagan.
>>
Atheism is a response to abrahamic oppression
>>
>>18601850
Actual belief in religion relies on the majority of people being malnourished, dehydrated and unhealthy. The pagan faiths would have stifled cooperation and the conditions that lead to a fed, hydrated and healthy society due to their callousness, so you’re right in a sense.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.