[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1770572741078315.png (350 KB, 550x531)
350 KB PNG
Is there a SINGLE historian with a positive view of the USSR that's not Losurdo, Grover Furr or Ludo Martens (who, by the way, aren't even historians)? When leftoids need a source for why Stalin was the most innocent man to ever live, they always seem to cite these 3 and nothing else.
>>
The anglosphere is not an authoritative source and the soviets were the good guys for the rest of the world
>>
>>18603532
If you had to chose between Joseph Stalin or Kamala Harris as the next president of the U.S. who would you chose.
>>
>>18603541
Kamala Harris because at the very least she won't kill me for being a chud
>>
File: MariaSpiridonova.jpg (2.54 MB, 1686x2360)
2.54 MB JPG
>>18603532
I'm not interested in defending Stalin, and even Lenin did a lot of bad shit. I'm much more interested in the SRs, especially the Left SRs. The USSR stopped being communist in the early 20s at the latest.
Why don't more leftists look to these guys?
>>
>>18603551
Slave mortality. You judge leaders based on whether they will affect your little life. Instead of whether they will empower our people/country. And obviously Stalin's got problems but he undeniably would turn us in the right direction. And modern communists/leftists would absolutely hate him
>>
>>18603620
I'm not convinced there would be many white Americans left after Stalin tries to collectivize agriculture while chimping out at white evangelicals. Stalin would conclude the bownification of the US. Maybe he would actually build some factories but that's it.
>>
File: 57949848383.jpg (31 KB, 373x536)
31 KB JPG
>>18603754
Stalin was a gay communist sure but he would not conclude the brownification of America. Stalin did not want to ethnically replace Russians so why would he ethnically replace Americans if he was an American. Stalin hated jews and would root out the jewish corruption in America which is driving the brownification. So Stalin would actually put a stop to it. Retard.
>>
>>18603541
Stalin because at the very least he would kill off the chuds
>>
>>18603602
>tried to drag Russia back into WW1
that's unforgivable, I would've been a Bolshevik despite all their faults for that reason alone
peace, land, and bread!
>>
>>18604028
There was once a hunter named Esau... who sold his birthright for a bowl of soup....
>>
>>18603538
>and the soviets were the good guys for the rest of the world
get the fuck out
>>
>>18603602
>Why don't more leftists look to these guys?
because MLs hate them and no one else has ever heard of them
>>
>>18603620
This has nothing to do with slave morality.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.