[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


a bit of a borderline /mu/ thread but how much liberties should be given to songwriters on their interpretation of historical events?
>>
>>18610690
bump
>>
>how much should we censor art that hurts my feelings because it's "le wrong interpretation"
what were you hoping to get out of this thread anon?
>>
>>18610690
>he says while posting on an anonymous forum designed to be a safe haven for retards that get banned on other platforms
kek
>>
>>18610982
Not the question i was asking. But since you want to get there and not everyone here is an American tell me how your third world shit hole would deal with them?
>>
>>18611011
How is this a bannable question? Its about history. Are you fucking retarded yourself?
>>
>>18611174
its not retard im saying its ironic that you're asking for censorship in a place that was built to harbor free speech
>>
>>18610690
Are you talking about topical ballads and such? Songwriters will always take liberties to create a more dramatic story and they’ll slant things to their point of view if there’s politics or a personal beef involved. Is it a good song or not?
>>
>>18610690
As much as makes a good song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KtXFqY5Qrw
>>
>>18611190
Then why do unironic Stalinists post here?
>>
>>18610690
How did dixies chick turn into dumbass chick in 2020? Such disrespect wrench.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik5IT6692DY
>>
>>18611478
Because Stalin turned the USSR from a feudal shithole to a space-faring nuclear super power.
No matter how much cope and lies are said, this is an indisputable fact.
>>
>>18613297
How’d it end buddy? Ignoring Russia’s giant growth pre-war, the fact the Soviets toppled Russian Republicans not the Tsar, and the sheer demographic losses they brought, was it the best direction they took? Definitely not, worthless shithole couldn’t even last a lifetime. You could be born in 1900, see all of it go down, and find it leaving a broken Russia as it shit itself to death in the most humiliating way possible. Its last vestiges, both in political rhetoric of “brotherhood”, its military hardware, are being obliterated now in the Russo-Ukraine War. Total Soviet Humiliation.
>>
>>18614250
>>18613297
Russia shouldn't left League of Three Emperor
>>
>>18614250
>How’d it end buddy?
Betrayed by traitors? I'm a Stalinist, not a Khrushchevist.
>Russia’s giant growth pre-war
lmao
>the Soviets toppled Russian Republicans not the Tsar
How does this change the fact 90% of the country were still backwards peasants that based papa Stalin uplifted to civilization?
>the sheer demographic losses they brought
How come when Britain famines tens of millions in India it's not capitalism's fault, but when kulaks hoard grain and cause starvation it is capitalism's fault?
>Its last vestiges, both in political rhetoric of “brotherhood”, its military hardware, are being obliterated now in the Russo-Ukraine War.
Wouldn't have happened if not for traitors and wreckers. There was nothing stopping them lasting to the present day, like the DPRK has.
>>
>>18615452
>Stalinist
Georgian degenerate who started USSR’s hyper focus on heavy industry to the neglect of everything else. It salvaged his ass during WW2 when his 18D geopolitical chess with Germany brought his country to the brink of destruction and irrevocable damage
>Russia’s giant pre war growth
A verifiable fact observed by contemporaries and observed by later historians as a cause for WW1. More so, without Russia’s burgeoning industry the Bolsheviks would not have the urban power base they’d use for usurping power.
>The Brits
So two inept empires neglecting their subjects, what am I supposed to get out of this? I’d say the Soviet Union was as embarrassing as the British model of empire, with coinciding deaths within decades of each other. The former crippled by communist inefficiencies, the latter burdened with its post war impotence. One thing about the Soviets was that they undermined extremely agricultural regions in Kazakhstan/Ukraine. Perhaps without Kulaks having been subject to state starvation USSR wouldn’t have depended on Argentina/America for grain during its lifespan
>Traitors and wreckers
By 89’ nobody wanted to die for a failed system. Some states have a last hero that tries rallying them. USSR, having failed in its own materialist vision, was abandoned by a joint wave of nationalism and weakness of shitty bureaucrats. At that point when the hardliner coup fell flat, everyone was finished with it. Unlike North Korea, which survives off Korean Nationalism, the idea of a “Universal Soviet” never materialized. The political elite of each country concluded to rid itself of a corpse, a failed experiment since Lenin. It’s time to move on, the ideology has less legitimacy compared to Lolbertism or Anarchism at this point. Stalin’s model of heavy industry was continued, but by the 70s they only had tens of thousands of microprocessors compared to millions of American. Times change, look to another ideology.
>>
>>18611680
Stay strong, follow Dixie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNvneLk3gMI
>>
Nashville should adapted Bonnie Blue Flag as city flag
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeSTdqDsEMg
>>
Hall of gachiGASM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNn6_0-_Ba8



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.