>The notion that the attractiveness of women and girls was based on boyishness was expressed through the phenomenon of the gulamiyyat. The gulamiyya was a girl whose appearance was as boyish as possible. The word stems from gulam, meaning “boy”, “servant” or “slave”. The word gulam has a distinct sexual connotation and is closely related to the verb, galima, which can be translated as “being excited (by lust)”. We can therefore define gulamiyya as a girl who possesses boyish sensuality. Muhammad al Warraq (d. 909 C.E.) wrote of one,>She understood that beauty can best arouse men’s love under the guise of a lad. She has therefore cut her hair in order to arrange it like a boy’s, and rolled her sleeves up like them. Each day she played sports—played at ball and at baton and shot at the target with her arrows. But how could she, alas, plug up that deep and sombre pit, something that no boy possesses?16>The tradition of the gulamiyyat most likely originated in the court of the Abbasid Caliph Al Amin (809-13 C.E.) in Baghdad. It is said that his mother arranged that a number of girls be disguised as boys in order to combat the preference the caliph had for eunuchs. >This practice spread quickly, especially in higher circles where many female slaves and servant girls circulated dressed and coifed as boys. Other means were used to achieve as boyish a countenance as possible. Some girls even painted a moustache in musk on their upper lips. It is said that the wife of the Umayyad Caliph Al Hakim II (961-76 C.E.) of Cordoba, because of his preference for boys, not only disguised herself as a gulamiyya but took the masculine name of Ja'far as well.17Why so many cultures and civilizations have had a fetish for tomboys?
>>18614153Tomboys are the best kind of female. They do all the chores and can keep up with men, mentally and to a largely lesser degree, physically
I wonder why some cultures prefer male beauty and others female. Maybe only gynocentric cucked cultures worship foids
>>18614176Listen buddy, these words are a diamond dozen, it's a doggy dog world for all intensive purposes
>>18614153>and I cried "Boy, help"What happened to the poor sultan?
>>18614153The lengths gay men will go, the long treatise they will write, to explain how them wanting to exclusively fuck boys totally doesn't make them gay, is phenomenal.And I say this as a heterosexual Tomboy lover. Note that what they're talking about in these passages are NOT tomboys, but literal proto-trans crossdressers made by mothers trying to trick their gay sons into providing an heir.
>>18614156This
>>18614153Man is the only real human being, giving some form(musculature) to a woman improves her
>>18614213The Sultan was actually gay
>>18614694That I understood. But why did he compare the poossey to a seething body of water and why was the rope necessary?
>>18614923The girl's pussy was wet and bleeding (she was a virgin), all while the gay Sultan was used to sticking his dick onto twink assholes.
>>18614964Thanks. Makes sense. I guess he was waxing poetic with the rope part
Why wasn't the Sultan stoned to death for being gay?
>>18616008Muslims only started seething about homosexuality in 20th century
>>18616008Because he is the highest body of Sharia law. If he says something's not a crime for him, then his word's equivalent to the prophet's.Also the North African societies these events took place in still aren't convinced that fucking boys as the active partner is gay. For quick reference, 1001 Nights is absolutely not short on gay pedo NTR stories.
