[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why is there still a historical psyop pushed to have you believe "Baphomet" is actually just a bad translation/respelling of "Muhammed" ??
Mainstream historians and surface level research would have you believe the Knights Templar just stumbled upon a bad translation of the Quran or something and became some kind of Proto-Islamic regime.
All despite the esotericism and symbolism behind the figure of Baphomet.
The Knights Templar originally acted as protectors for pilgrims travelling to Jerusalem against Islamic raiders, so to think they'd either convert or just mistake their prophet for a Christian deity is just too far-fetched and retarded.
>>
>>18616553
You don’t know what ten years in the desert does to a wigga…
>>
>>18616553
Who claims the Templars actually worshipped Mohammed? Name 5 historians that say that.
>>
>>18616553
The Bitch.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.