[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1632518586261.jpg (31 KB, 600x600)
31 KB JPG
Rightists never explain why spite and killing/maiming/enslaving off those higher on the hierarchy than you is wrong.
At the end of the day might IS right and looks, status, charisma matters jak shit against a rifle.
Ask the tsar daughters
>>
>>18616807
Yep, this is why as a rightoid I think those revolutionaries are right. If the aristocracy is overthrown, then it deserved to be. The underclasses are utterly right to pursue their own will to power.
>>
>>18616807
How do you quantify who is higher on the social hierarchy than you? You can't just go by income bracket because that might mean there's more of them than there is of you. Someone who is middle class isn't going to feel class solidarity with you bro, sorry.
>>
It weakens your society relative to potential competitors which DON'T do that kind of shit. Like how Cambodia is now decisively weaker and poorer than Thailand due to self-inflicted events during the 1970's.
>>
>>18616817
>How do you quantify who is higher on the social hierarchy than you?
As a rightist? Who can overthrow whom.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.