The key difference that from Morocco to Ahwaz ALL Arabs are on board with it and what needs to happen (elimination of Israel and Iranian proxies) regardless if they are Muslim or Christian, whereas whites cannot even agree on who makes the cut for whiteness, so you have some whites like Varg saying that Southern Europeans are not white, while some of the most vicious white racists come out of Spain and Portugal and they obviously view themselves as white. How do you get around that? Likewise some white nationalists don't even accept the Greeks or even the Irish as white. There are memes and mockery towards white Americans as mutts. Others say that the Slavs are not white. Others are quite adamant that the Iranians are "part of us" whereas others say no they are shitskin sandniggers who don't belong in Europe. Are the Armenians in or out? What about the Muslim Bosnians and Albanians? do they make the cut?Some won't accept Christianity which they consider "semitic filth" while others want Christian nationalism as their basis. So these issues are key points of contention among white nationalist thinkers. If a man says >Messi>WhiteThat's not just a bit of bantz and playful brotherhood but it is actually a KEY point of division among white nationalists, whether or not Argentinians, Spaniards, Brazilians etc are to be included. For Arabs there is no >Mo Salah>Arabor >King of Morocco>ArabNo. These are unanimously part of the Arab brotherhood whether or not one likes them or affirms their politics. It's all about BLOOD and blood is the crux matter that whites cannot agree on for their ideology.
>>18618110Arab nationalism has been a complete failure and has largely been replaced by Sunni Islamism. Perhaps in theory it is powerful, in practice it accomplished nothing
