[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Yasser-Arafat.jpg (388 KB, 1114x1454)
388 KB JPG
Pakistanis have taken over Palestine activism and the Palestine issue is linked to them more than the Middle Eastern and Arab countries. Pakistanis are the ones pushing for military options and hardcore force against Israel while Arabs are happy to take more of a relaxed approach that calls for peace and cooperation.

The average Pakistani in the UK cares way more about Palestine than some Qatari or Saudi in London. Pakis want to kill for Palestine, they want blood.

All Pakis want to tag team with Turkey and take out Israel. They are absolutely obsessed with an alliance with Turkey and the Turks are on board with it too.

This is not the 1960s anymore where the Palestine issue was linked to countries like Egypt, Saudi, Syria, even Iran is seeking some kind of agreement for peace behind closed doors.

But there can be no peace as far as Pakistanis are concerned. They want to align with Turkey and invade Israel.

So what's the point of all this? The point is that Islam cannot be Arab supremacy if Turks and Pakistanis are seen as the great defenders of Islam and Palestine activism. Both Pakis and Turks are non-Arab yet the most ferocious about Palestine and defending Sunni Islam.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.