These guys really were the historical bane of humanity huh.
>>18625990Calm down there don quijote
It depends on what you mean by “these guys”The bourgeois landowners? Yes, they are filth Landowners as a whole? No, not really.
>>18626002>some random fucking relatives can just invite themselves to your huge mansion and live there for years>can't do anything, because of social conventionsIt's insane how generous aristocratic landowners were in comparison to bourgeois landowners.
>>18626078This is sort of off topic but knowing difference between the aristocrats and the bourgeois is crucial for understanding the history of civilization itself. For the vast majority of human history, we lived under an aristocratic system. That fascination the ancients had with figures like Achilles? Well that is in itself an aristocratic trait. The aristocracy values heroism, beauty, vitality, excellence, and the transcendent. The bourgeois on the other hand is mostly concerned with economic stability and monetary gain. Taking this into account, we can understand the French/Atlantic revolutions as a battle between the aristocrats and the bourgeois. And the latter would go on to be victorious but not until 1991, when the United States (the quintessential bourgeois state) became the sole global superpower
>>18625990And this is the problem with paradox games - they brainwash you with class divide bullshit
>>18625990>>18626002>>18626078>rentoid screechingtake it up with your landlord not us
>>18626115An aristocrat is just a bourgeois who has held on to his title long enough for you to forget how he got it.The Wright Brothers, who could only invent manned flight thanks to their bourgeois lifestyle as bicycle shop owners enabled by the Industrial Revolution, brought forth the ultimate expression of beauty and excellence and literal transcendence over flightless creatures.Napoleon's wars of conquest were wars to export the values of the French Revolution, to knock down ghettos and dismantle the Church's power structure and unite Europe under globohomo. And he is universally considered an expression of heroism and military valor.The only reason you know and care about Achillles today was the classical revival that swept across Europe after Heinrich Schliemann, a bourgeois merchant, searched for and excavated Troy, a city previously dismissed by the aristocrats as lost.
>>18626368This is absolute fucking drivel that could’ve only come from an American who conditioned to worship the bourgeois and their decadence from an early age.The truth is the bourgeois have always been against virtues like heroism, beauty, and aristocratic excellence. Dante, Machiavelli, Castiglione, Michelangelo, Petrarch, and many, many others were aristocrats. And the very few who weren’t were all patronized by wealthy aristocrats.Federico de Montefeltro, Isabelle d’este, Pope Leo X, Julius II, Paul III, Scipione Borghese, Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc, Thomas Howard, Earl of Arundel, William Cavendish, Duke of Newcastle, John Evelyn, Sir William Hamilton, Leopold II Duke of Tuscany, Ludwig I of Bavaria, etc. were all aristocrats who helped bring the ancient world back into European culture. And they only did it because they were brought up on aristocratic virtues and not the modern American consumerism that has infected every country on earth
>>18626444Posted from an American iPhone, why are you even larping?If only Europeans hadn't been as retarded as you at the time of the French Revolution, it could have been prevented.Boulainvilliers warned his fellow French aristocrats that they were not special good-boy heroic beautiful angels descended from heaven. They were the descendants of the Franks who conquered the Gallo-Romans by cutting their legs off and ripping their intestines out on a muddy field.The other aristocrats REJECTED this idea, they insisted that they were beautiful virtuous HEROES who brought CIVILIZATION to France, and that no nation could ever be borne of barbarism and racial subjugation because such bourgeois cruelty could not be the basis for a magnificent nation like France. They ridiculed Boulainvilliers and compared his idea of the aristocracy as descending from warrior Franks as ridiculous as descending from Trojans They were wrong, they needed to be tougher, they needed to get their hands dirty, they needed to bring more bourgeois wealth to their dirty peasants to keep them from rebelling and taking over.Anyway, remember every time you get in an airplane or a car or use your American iPhone to thank the bourgeois. Remember every time you read about the excavation of Troy and the resurgence of enthusiasm for chariots, swastikas, warfare, heroism, beauty and the Iliad, to thank Heinrich Schliemann.>Dante, Machiavelli, Castiglione, Michelangelo, Petrarch,>Federico de Montefeltro, Isabelle d’este, Pope Leo X, Julius II, Paul III, Scipione Borghese, Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc, Thomas Howard, Earl of Arundel, William Cavendish, Duke of Newcastle, John Evelyn, Sir William Hamilton, Leopold II Duke of Tuscany, Ludwig I of Bavaria,You just wasted your time making a long list of people whose ancestors were nothing but brutes who then conquered their fellow brutes and subjugated them ECONOMICALLY. When aristocrats forget that fact is the harbinger of their doom.
>>18625990Yeah I fucking hate giants tooBunch of dumb antichivalrous troublemakers
>>18626462>no argument, just a long rant insulting aristocratsI accept your concession. Aristocrats will always be more cultured than bourgeois filth.
>>18626647You are not and you never will be an aristocrat. Your people were probably low born sheep fuckers.
>>18626444Who is that guy?
>>18626368Aristocrats are way better than degenerate bourgeois. Reason being that in South Korea the bourgeois is the state nowadays.Everything is owned by a handful of corporations who in practice have all the power.But what do they represent? Do they represent the nation and the people of South Korea? Absolutely not. I don't think you understand that the aristocracy IS the nation and the state. You cannot have a serious civilization without having a class of aristocracy.The bourgeois only care about capital. The aristocracy cares about wealth too however they care about their nation, historical lineage and culture much more than the average bourgeois.
>>18628249>The aristocracy cares about wealth too however they care about their nation, historical lineage and culture much more than the average bourgeois.And you have evidence of this or are you just working backwards to justify your feels on this
