>Hates gays with a burning passion and thinks that they’re categorically beyond salvation>Worships a translation of the Bible that was commissioned and approved by a literal sodomiteDoes anyone else find that kinda strange? I know King James didn’t personally translate the Bible, but still. You’d think he’d at least want to remove his name from it or something.
Because he’s a massive faggot
>>18628421Christianity is just Kantianism for primitive superstitious schizophrenic retards.Thank you for listening to my TED talk.
>>18628421God hates fags but loves interracial marriage! Race mix now! There is neither greek nor jew!Your version of Christianity? Fake and gay! Mine the real one! derrrrrrrrrrrrrr45k flavors!
>>18628436Kant was a Christian bro
>>18628441technically.
>>18628421inb4>enjoy hell!
>>18628421King James wasn't a Sodomite, he was a King, which means he was in a dominant position. Sodomy implies someone in a submissive position taking on a dominant role against their superior. Sexual dynamics were closely tied to class in the ancient world. Sodomy didn't refer to all homosexual acts in its original context
>>18628442He critiqued pure reason, but not pure faithChristian confirmed
>>18628421Tranny leftist historians try to smear all kinds of historical figures as gay all the time.
>>18628555why were so many of those "tranny leftist historians" his own contemporaries? Why was there a secret passage connecting his bedroom to the Duke of Buckingham's?
>>18628496>Sodomy implies someone in a submissive position.Does it though? Even still, I don’t think Pastor Anderson’s gripe is only with bottom gays.
>>18628496>Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.Leviticus 18:22It is the penetrator that lies with mankind as one would with womankind, unless you count pegging which the ancient Hebrews probably didn't.
>>18630049This verse is concerned with rape specifically, not homosex in general. Women are always meant to take the submissive role. In the Bible, rape of a woman is acceptable as long as you marry her, in addition, there are no comparable verse with regards to same sex between two women, because it was always about submissive vs dominant roles. That's just how sexual dynamics worked in the ancient world
>>18628439Christbros not like this!
>>18628421God hates men who sleep with another man's wife more than he hates men who sleep with other men. It is a way bigger offense. God gave the death penalty to both the gay and the adulterer.
>>18630054>This verse means something completely different from what it saysHow convenient.
>>18630077????Are you implying Bible verses exist in a vacuum?
>>18630064>two consensual men having consensual relations should be murderedInsanity.
>>18630080I am implying that the authors meant what they said, as a normal person.
>>18630088I agree, which is why said authors wrote entire books instead of random verses in isolation
>>18630085Correct. It's demonic behavior.
>>18630113But 18:21 and 18:23 are not about gay sex at all:>And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the Lord.>Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.All of Leviticus 18 is God telling Moses of different things that the Israelites should and should not do, 18:22 is just one of them.
>>18628421Keep slandering King James, those flames will just get hotter.
>>18630126Again, there's a lot of nuance here, and the lack of prohibition on same sex intercourse between women should be a clue (keep in mind Leviticus outlines sexual conduct) but this isn't my own interpretation, a lot of scholars have come to similar conclusions
>>18630145>the lack of prohibition on same sex intercourse between between women should be a clueNot really, Lesbianism is a modern meme.
>>18630145It wasn't common for women to be licking each other's vaginas in a time period without soap and running water. Besides, in those times the main reason women wanted to marry a man was for him to provide for her and protect her because women couldn't provide for or protect themselves. There were no jobs or government assistance or police.It was just not a thing back then for women to pick another woman as their spouse, they would both starve to death or would be kidnapped, enslaved and pimped out or worse.Lesbianism is a first world problem.
>>18630190>Lesbianism is a first world problem.The word "Lesbian" comes from the Greek Island of Lesbos, which was home to the Ancient Greek Poet Sappho, who wrote poetry regarding lesbian romance
>>18630195She also wrote poetry about heterosexual romance.
>>18630195The Greeks had running water.
>>18630195All wickedness came from Greece. From degeneracy to democracy.
>>18628439Anderson doesn't push racemixing. Have fun burning, those flames just got hotter.
King James was straight. There's zero evidence he fucked another man, it's just Papist bullshit.
>>18628439Okay they can love each other legitimately whatever I hope they're happy but no matter what anyone says black male/white female just looks disgusting to me. Physiognomy clearly disagrees with this pairing
>>18628421That asshole beat up his own son and threatened to kill him for having a vaguely edgy chat for this christian friend group.
