If you have a time machine and a gun with three bullets, is it morally justifiable to kill baby Stalin, baby Trotsky and baby Lenin?>No Stalin: no Red Terror, purges, kulakisation, deportations, no rape of Berlin etc>No Trotsky: Reds never win the Russian Civil War and the Tsardom retakes control of Russia>No Lenin: No successful communist uprising which threatens Europe and forces Hitler to start a preemptive war with the EastEverybody wins out.
>>18630754Why would I kill those HEROES who saved the world by genociding hordes of nazi pedophiles without mercy
>>18630756Nazis wouldn’t be genocidal if it weren’t for the Bolshevik threat for one.
>>18630757that's even better that we were given a reason to crush this evil movement without mercy, imagine if it was allowed to fester, it would turn germany into a hell on earth
>>18630754I would be giving them modern guns instead
I'd probably shoot adult trotsky 3 times for betraying the revolution
>>18630816Trotsky never betrayed it, he always stayed true to the original Bolshevik vision.
>>18630754>If you have a time machine and a gun with three bullets, is it morally justifiable to kill babyNo. If you're too stupid to come up with a more creative solution than "kill baby" then you're too stupid to be chosen for time travel, frankly. Infinite possibilities of ways you can introduce ideas into that persons life, so that they don't turn out into a mass murdering authoritarian. You tunnel vision murdering a baby as the be-all solution lol. That's wack, yo.
>>18630754Kill this fucking loser, shoot him in the nuts, gills and then head.
