Is it true?Did all humans (Whites, Blacks, Asians, Amerindians etc.) originate in Africa and expand out?Or did each race evolve seperately from one another?My inclination is that humanity, if we all came from the same place, would most likely have sprung up in the Middle East rather than Sub-Saharan Africa
>>18645704>did each race evolve seperately from one another?Anon, think about this for a moment. If we had all evolved separately, we wouldn't be able to interbreed. There is strong evidence we did originate in africa (though we did then interbreed with others like neanderthals, who also originated from africa, just earlier).Also there is zero reason to make this a political or racial issue. Ground and land are not magical items that remember the people that lived on it. The practical effect it has is that africa as a whole has greater genetic diversity than the rest of the world, but that too is not a political issue. It's just a quirk of human development.
>>18645704>Did all humans (Whites, Blacks, Asians, Amerindians etc.) originate in Africa and expand out?That's not what the out of africa theory is, retard.Homo sapiens originated in Africa and migrated out, over thousands of years.
Multiregional hypothesis is way stronger than it and keeps getting vindicated every year.Meanwhile the old OOA "Replacement Hypothesis" is literally dead and buried for about a decade at this point.
>>18645704debooonked millions of timeshttp://www.bing.com/search?q=out+of+africa+debunked
>>18645790Finding that humans had Neanderthal blood pretty much btfoed the purist form of OOA that was fashionable in the late 20th century.But most human DNA still comes from Africa.
Isn't it just Homo Sapiens left Africa and those that traveled to Europe interbred with Neanderthals and those that went to Asia interbred with Denisovans?
>>18645790What about Out-Of-Taiwan theory by Peter Bellwood?
>>18645704This map is wrong btw, the Māori in New Zealand were Polynesians who crossed the Pacific from South America, they didn’t come from South East Asia.
>Is it true?Yes. All of the evidence people use to say that it's been debunked is either a nothingburger or simply means that OOA is more complex than previously thought.> would most likely have sprung up in the Middle East rather than Sub-Saharan AfricaThere actually isn't a single area in Africa we originate from; we're a a mix of mixed populations. It's also plausible that the middle east could've been relevant to our genesis, though it *definitely* wasn't central.
>>18645704>Or did each race evolve seperately from one another?>evolve Begging the question, huh? The Out of Africa theory is obvious bollocks. There's no connection whatsoever. Europeans are a mixture of the WHG, ANF, EHG and CHG (if we go even before the Yamnaya). The first is indegenous to Europe, the second is the most prevalent in Europe, the third is a mixture of WHG and ANE (Ancient North Eurasian), and the 4th comes from the Caucasus. >My inclination is that humanity, if we all came from the same place, would most likely have sprung up in the Middle East rather than Sub-Saharan AfricaThat appears to be correct. Our admixture, as described above, paints a clear picture:>first there were the WHGs>then came the ANFs from Anatolia>then the EHGs mixed with CHG, forming the Yamnaya>the Yamnaya came to EuropeThe question is whether there were 2 sources of "north" European admixture, or 1.If the EHGs wanted to go to Europe, why mix with the CHG, instead of going straight west?The only explanation I see is that there was another wave of "northern" European migration, that mixed with the CHG, to then go to Europe. This route suggests they came from the Middle East. Pic rel is a good hint for that - Finland shows significant level of straight ANE admixture, even if Yamnaya is also in the model. Estonia is smaller, and then everyone else falls dramatically. Africa? Not a shred of evidence.
>>18645704>evolveNo, and if you believe that then enjoy hell. You should only believe in the "out of eden" theory
>>18646410Here's a PCA chart I made, showing this. The Sintashta_o3 sample appears to be the clearest "north" European sample out there. >no asian>no WHG>no CHG>no ANFWhich probably makes it the best ANE sample out there, along with the Afontova_Gora_LUP one (the Sinatshta one shows much smaller CHG numbers in European countries, for some reason, so the AG seems to work better). Yamnaya, as you can see, sits inbetween EHG and CHG, showing its genetic origins.
>>18645704White people seem to be the default setting for a "human". Everything else is a downgrade. Asians keep the IQ, but lose the looks and creativity. Blacks lose... everything, except for running fast. Other races are also inferior. Where did the white man come from? I doubt it's Africa. And even if it is, by the time they left the continent, there was most likely nobody else there, at the time.
>pokémon evolution
>>18646795>white trash lactose intolerant sunburn-capable cucks with a million allergies are the default setting for “human”
If we all came from Africa does that mean I have the nigga pass?
>>18646122I prefer the Out of America theory, we are descended from New World primates like capuchins and our earliest form were basically hobbits.The most compelling close parallels to human speech patterns and prosociality are not found among the great apes, but the monkeys of America. Facts.
>>18645704>Out of Africa TheoryIt's probably another Jewish ploy to tarnish white ancestry. Just like the bullshit with black western hunter gatherers.
>>18645704>My inclination is that humanity, if we all came from the same place, would most likely have sprung up in the Middle East rather than Sub-Saharan AfricaI hold this opinion too. It also aligns with the Bible.
>>18645704>My inclination isno one gives a shit about your hunches you sub-midwit, put up or shut up
>>18645704I always thought some pretty compelling evidence for this was how many animals in africa can easily kill a human being, versus places like north and South America where there are comparatively few.
>>18645704>Is it true?No, the Multi-regional Theory is quietly accepted by all but political correctness demands that Out of Africa continue to be shilled.
>>18645704I reckon the proto eurasian population resembled the purported ancestral north african population, stayed in arabia or some shit for ~10000 years and got adaptations and genetic drift, the ones that stayed there were basal eurasians, the others were crown, east and west eurasians
>>18645704The best explanation is almost always the best. It went like this:>after the global flood, there were 3 breeding human couples, and a lot of animals>the animals went everywhere on their own>the humans stayed in the Middle East >after the dispersion from the Tower of Babel, people went everywhere>they mixed with the humanoid animals (with which it was biologically possible) in their respective areas>in Asia, they mixed with such organisms, that the looks changed slightly, and the IQ went up by a little>in Africa they mixed with other humanoids, that degraded the IQ and completely changed the looks>similar mixings took place in other places of the world>white people are the only remnant of the original humans, that left the Ark, 4500 years ago
>>18650396wow, a theory so retarded it not only contradicts established science but more established religious doctrine
>>18650396There are a few clips online, showing those transition-type of beings. This creature appears to be a good example. His admixture level of that primal animal seems to be higher. There was a similar video from China, showing this transitional form, half humanoid, half the other thing. I don't know how to find it, especially since Google is cucked.
>>18650396What about the indians bro?
>>18650400>contradicts established scienceThe exact opposite - it aligns with it. Nobody has ever observed evolution, but what we do observe, is cross-breeding. Nevermind the fact that evolution is actually impossible, due to mutation accumulation, and the inability for the genes to appear out of nowhere. If we take a simple organism, where are the genes for legs, hands, organs, brain, etc. supposed to come from? Mutations? The genetic copying mistakes?
>>18650419>it aligns with itno it doesn't especially in your time frame since the last living hominid died 40,000 years ago
Isn't it amazing how these guys always claim that it's everyone else trying to twist the facts to suit their agenda? I think it's something in human psychology like, your rational mind knows that you are trying to make the facts suit your position, but it can't accept this or risk challenging that position, so it has to express itself by accusing everyone else of doing that.
>>18650422>the last living hominid died 40,000 years agoWhich I'm sure you have solid data for, instead of dating methods that rely on assumptions.
>>18650428carbon dating certainly wouldn't be an assumption in this case since its well within its general 55,000 year limit, not that you really care
>>18650411That little nigga is fucking deformed, you retard. You can see people with that exact same "look"(disability) anywhere.>>18650396>in Africa they mixed with other humanoids, that degraded the IQ and completely changed the looksThe african archaic (which is ancestral to all humans today, making up ~20% of our ancestry on average) is actually related to our unique cognition and intelligence. Ancestry from this population peaks in Niger-Congoids, and its certainly related to the "ghost" signals that can be found all throughout Africa.
>>18650435>carbon dating certainly wouldn't be an assumption in this case since its well within its general 55,000 year limit, not that you really careWhat I meant is that those dating methods (like carbon dating) themslves rely on assumptions, which makes them unreliable. In Carbon Dating, we assume that C14 is at an equilibrium. If it's not - everything falls apart. If it wasn't bad enough, you also can't be sure of the rate of decay of C14. All of that completely disqualifies CD as a reliable dating method.
>>18650459>you also can't be sure of the rate of decay of C14.do you have the slightest idea how many other physical phenomena would have to behave differently for this to happen?
>>18645704No.The "Out-of-Africa" theory has been thoroughly debunked; humans originated somewhere around the Black & Caspian Seas, perhaps in a verdant vale later drowned under said sea during the Deluge, when much glacial melting raised sea levels globally after the peak of an Ice Age. Blended with this original pure strain are the subhuman genes of cthonic hominids who'd evolved naturally throughout the surrounding lands, along with ayyy lmao et cetera.
>>18645704It's confirmed and it won't be debunked in the future. It's basically a fact, not a theory at this poin.
>>18646062rebunked millions of times +1
>>18649590praise the LORD God of Israel my kekistani brother!
>>18645717But we can't interbreed. Mixed race people are lower intelligence, have weird phenotypes, and their skin always looks dirty. They can breed with the race they relate to the most, but it will never be enough. One drop rule exist for a reason. I'm talking exclusively about breeding with niggers btw.
>>18647756We are the default human, you nappy headed ugly big lipped nigger. Remind me again, does Africa have any castles dating back to over a thousand years ago? Mud huts built with cow dung instead of pig dung do not count.
>>18650438>That little nigga is fucking deformedDoesn't look like it. Look at his body proportions. He looks like another organism. Hybrid of some sorts.
>>18652108>he looks like another organismthat is usually what deformities entail, hence why they are called deformities since it didn't form right, they aren't even to hard to get if you live in an area where the government doesn't give enough of a shit to make sure companies and local retards aren't just dumping toxic chemicals into the water supply
>>18651295>But we can't interbreed.>Mixed race people are
>>18652332He probably meant it as "we can't do it, because its consequences are dire".
