When they arrived at the caribbeans the first thing they did was mass slaughter the friendly natives and sexually enslave whatever women and little girl was left, in two decades 90% of the tainos were decimatedSpanish presence in mesoamerica and andes was also catastrophic and genocidal, the only reason a full extermination of natives in spanish settler colonies did not happen it was because there were too many of them and the crown quickly saw how profitable it was to enslave them in encomiendas, up until the 1800s there were literally a caste system in spanish settler colonies where the indigenous were at the bottomIn contrast the english colonizer sparsely populated areas in new england and mid atlantic at first, and at first were generally peaceful and even allied/befriended local tribal nations such as the Iroquois, the genocide and anti-"indian" campaigns only started after America got its indepence. So it was really the Americans not the British guilty for the onslaught in North AmericaPic related is the ""civilization, kindness" and """willingful""" mestizaje the spics bought to the new worl
In fact, the spics tried to do the same genocidal acts they did in the new world to the Maghreb, the Ottoman sultan at the time was horrified by the brutality on Mexico after he captured Cortez and said he made a terrible mistake thinking Algeria was the New World
>>18652255>the Ottoman sultan at the time was horrified by the brutality on Mexico after he captured CortezWhat manner of 'jeet delusion is this?
>>18652281My mistake he wasn't captured, but the Padishah did comment on the Spanish brutality in the New World afted the pathetic and failed attempt at invading Algeria
>>18652255What relevance do the butcherers of the Balkans have to say on questions of new world atrocities. It’s always funny though to see Pakistani diaspora so fervently sycophantic to his Turkish overlords though. In the way that Israelis never accept Indian simping, Turks view Pakistani ones the same.
