[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: maxresdefault.jpg (220 KB, 1280x720)
220 KB JPG
Which one was better?
>>
camel in a desert, horse everywhere else
>>
>>18653235
Camels can carry way more stuff.
And horses need fresh water everyday
>>
Camel counters cavalry but cavalry is better against footmen
>>
>>18653239
camels foot pads start to literally rot if they spend extended periods in wet or muddy environments. and thankfully there is fresh water almost everywhere outside of deserts
so,
camel in a desert, horse everywhere else



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.