[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images(61).jpg (35 KB, 549x364)
35 KB JPG
Was scalemail worse than chainmail?
>>
>>18653377
only weaker against upward thrusts. which is actually pretty bade in close combat. but it works great vs projectiles, which only ever approach at downward angles. also, it is way less heavy than chain mail (even if you cannot initially intuit this; scale mail uses less material)
>>
File: file.png (843 KB, 837x1280)
843 KB PNG
>>18653377
It was dogshit hence it was phased out pretty quickly. Pic related is a better version of this concept and it was in that region, vastly superior to chainmail because it resisted arrows better and arrows are the mainstay of steppe warfare.
>>
>>18653377
it was heavier and more expensive
>>
>>18653377
Wouldn't it suck against stabs that come from below?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.