Would society be better if college educated people's votes counted for 10% more than HS only people's votes?
Society would be better if there was unity of the people, and no politics and no elections.
>>18654220A bachelor's suggests next to zero about your actually intelligence, especially since it has become the new baseline for the workforce. Sorry bud, but your BA in communications from a Florida State doesn't make you Aristotle.
>>18654220Society was better when only white men who owned land could vote or have rights.
>>18654232Why even let tards vote at all? 80 IQ should be digging ditches not deciding nuclear weapons policies
>>18654233Any moron can inherit property without even knowing how to read. Why should his say be greater than that of the PhD student of political science preparing his thesis for final approval?
>>18654220In first-world countries half the population is college-educated. Most of them don't do anything with said education and are just as retarded as the common rabble. You would also significantly increase the weight of overeducated plebs with more money (read: debt) than sense.A better system would be to 4x the vote of a person who owns land that is developed and not currently being used as collateral (so mortgages and refinanced homes don't count).
>>18654220>what if the votes of educated-stupid people were more equal than othersI don't want to live in California
>>18654220You’d be on the fast track to mandatory child transitions
>>18654237Considering how correlated wealth and education are, the effect might not be all that different. But why use wealth as a proxy for knowledge and wisdom when we have actual degrees saying "This person was smart enough to pass these classes?" I don't want a retarded trust fund baby dictating my future when I have a higher level of academic achievement than him.
>>186542361. Men can also acquire property through their own skill, which as landed men would be entitled to vote 2. Men who inherit property are descended from men which earned property, and they will not only inherit their property but also their superior traits which led their forefathers to earn this property in the first place, at least with much more reliability than seeking it randomly from the common rabble, which vote for bread and circuses 3. Property owners have a direct stake in the wellbeing of their society, unlike economic parasites who are eager to test out everything they were taught about queer revolutionary theory
>>18654250Warren Buffett once said that nothing ruins the mind like inherited wealth. Have you seen many trust fund babies? Any good genes they have get smothered by lacking any need to work hard or think critically. Daddy will sort out any problems. We need a degree of some sort to filter out those morons.
>>18654220>>18654242>>18654236I agree with this but only for STEMgods. Actually, people who willingly get humanities degrees should have their votes counted less.Plato came up with the concept of the "Philosopher King" when philosophy and literature and science and engineering were all one in the same. Plato would weep at the thought of rule by Communications majors.
>>18654268Plato thought applied science itself was inferior. He would have been all for making the chair of Harvard's philosophy department an absolute monarch. Maybe best not to listen to him
>>18654265You will never “filter out the morons”, certainly not by giving power to the pink-haired gremlins coming out of universities, that’s more like filtering out the non-morons. You can however reduce this kind of behavior by instilling the Christian faith throughout society, and when they believe the bible’s teaching about God’s sovereignty in time, contentment in God, and the deceitfulness of wealth, they will realize money and pleasure are of themselves worthless, and that God placed them in this position for the good of their neighbor rather than their own pleasure, and they will be both very productive and gentle to those who are under them.
>>18654274The beauty of science is iteration. We take the ideas of the past and improve upon them, and when they prove to be false we discard them. Modern academia proves that rule by philosophers is just as corruptible as rule by aristocracy and rule by mod. It's time for an Engineer King.
>rule by mod*rule by mob
>>18654293Which ideas did the invention of bottom surgery improve upon?
>>18654297I will trust a professional troon sculptor as king over a polsci fag any day.
>>18654297Apparently a lot of trans medical operations are derived from procedures developed for cis people, so I guess they "improved" on the old ideas by finding out how to use them for an additional good purpose, making trans people less likely to kill themselves.
>>18654265>Have you seen many trust fund babies? Any good genes they have get smothered by lacking any need to work hard or think critically. Daddy will sort out any problemst. 9/5 poorfag cope
There are different models of it Jason Brennan is the biggest endorser of the full version. Most who hold for the position generally argue for it being used to determine means testing for various institutions or bureaucracies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMtBo6J0o-Uhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kcJwouVFxQ
