[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Peter_Ruckman.jpg (14 KB, 225x322)
14 KB JPG
Peter Ruckman was a complete and utter schizo. Reading him feels like reading Francis E. Dec. He seriously makes Steven Anderson look sane. Why did people take him seriously?

https://www.aomin.org/aoblog/king-james-onlyism/debate-never-james-whites-challenge-dr-peter-ruckman-debate/
>>
Nobody takes him seriously. True KJV onlyists (not including people who are just textus receptus advocates) are a tiny fringe position within sentient Christianity. What evangelicals do or believe is of no soteriological interest.
>>
>>18654329
>a tiny fringe position
Thousands of people still seems like a lot.
>>
>>18654329
People on this board cope with the KJV whenever some horrific shit is pointed out in other translations. So it matters to us at least
>>
>>18655750
Which is really weird because for most of the passages that get posted here KJV says the same shit
>>
>>18654324
>schizo
Enjoy hell



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.