Is the official Monte Cassino narrative a lie? Was it actually an American chimpout against a bunch of civilians?
So let's recap:>germoids and shitalians use a monastery as a defense fort (this is GOOD, somehow)>a handful of civilians seek shelter in an active military installation (this is GOOD, somehow)How about if you want to preserve a monastery you don't fucking use it?
>>18655097That's not the claim here. That's the allied narrative. The question is whether the allied narrative is a lie, and the monastery was NOT a military position. It turns out that many of the media outlets promoting the allied narrative had Jewish management or ownership, which is obviously a HUGE conflict of interest in the context of WWII.
>>18655087Good. If you ally yourself with Hitler you don't deserve mercy.
>>18655115Again, that's not the allied/official narrative. The allied narrative is not "fuck Italian civilians, because Italy was a German ally." The allied narrative is very specific, and it holds that Monte Cassino monastery building was a German military post.If that's a lie, it reflects very poorly on the allies, since they could have just been honest.
>>18655115But Hitler was good and his enemies were all evil orcs.
>>18655087>mamma mia no-a attack-a de monasticomontecassino many importante reliquaria
Yeah, probably.I remember watching a History Channel documentary about it sometime around 2009 that made no sense.They certainly didn't mention the ridiculous casualty rates.
>>18655087>My researchhow many grams?
>>18655087The Italian Campaign was a mess post Sicily. Why would Roosevelt listen to that retard Churchill for that scheme, who knows.
>>18655441That's the neat thing, with Gemini summarizing a wikipedia article and some random reddit hot takes, you don't need drugs for hallucinations to occur.
