reminder that the lying bitch who got him killed died peacefully in her sleep at 89 while poor Emmett didn't get to finish high school
>>18655159>Believe all women
if he was that uppity in the 50s in the Deep South imagine all the kinds of shit he would have been up to during the crack epidemic of the 80s
can't wait for /pol/ to defend the beating death of a child
>>18655159The punishments fall all in one day.
>>18655159Well Nothing anyone can do anymore.
Every 'witness' who supposedly proves the woman wrong was some black dude who totally didn't have an agenda.
>>18655159>Emmett didn't get to finish high schoolThat's not very remarkable for a black
>>18655171>14 years oldWe're all too familiar with the 'rowdy teenager' phenomenon by now. The racist South has been utterly vindicated.
The quickest rundown is that his dad was an executed rapist/killer, he was a 'troubled teen' in Chicago, and his mom sent him 'down south' to a more rural area so that he could mend his troubled ways and learn some manners.Instead, he got sexually aggressive with a married white woman, may have fondled/molested her, and then got uppity and aggressive when others found out about this and demanded that he apologize.That seems to be the most likely course of events.
>>18655199What's your source?
>>18655199Imagine the future saint stories about Karmelo and the Cambridge proffesor guy
>>18655159He was guilty and justice was served. Instead of bitching about it, learn the lesson.
>>18655230>Instead of bitching about it, learn the lesson.That's like telling faggots to stop being so promiscuous to avoid contracting AIDS. You're practically telling them to stop being themselves and they correctly see it as an attack on their identity.
>>18655159Kill yourself tranny
>>18655228I feel bad for the Cambridge guy desu. Was he a plagiarist and liar? Yes. But he was also retarded. That’s not really an excuse but it never would have mattered if some retard was trying to plagiarize if the people around him didn’t hype him up and put him in the spotlight. They used a retarded man to make a political point and then the retard killed himself when they backlash hit. If they were going to take advantage of a retard they could have at least stuck by him and defended him. It really show that deep down they don’t really care about these people and will throw them away once they’ve stopped being useful.
>>18655255>will throw them away once they’ve stopped being useful.He made himself useful again by offing himself, they're now using his death to go after the guy that exposed him in the first place.
>His mother, Mamie Till, knew Emmett to be a jokester accustomed to being the centre of attention>On August 24, Till and a group of other teens went to a local grocery store after a day of working in the fields. Accounts of what transpired thereafter vary. Some witnesses stated that one of the other boys dared Till to talk to the store’s cashier, Carolyn Bryant, a white woman. It was reported that Till then whistled at, touched the hand or waist of, or flirted with the woman as he was leaving the store. Whatever the truth, Till did not mention the incident to his great-uncle
>>18655159>while poor Emmett didn't get to finish high schoolhe probably wouldn't have finished it anyway
>reminder that the lying bitch who got him killed died peacefully in her sleep at 89 while poor Emmett didn't get to finish high school
>>18655255He wasn't exploited in the slightest. Cambridge wanted Supernigger, and they were more than happy to throw any form of caution or skepticism to the side to acquire Supernigger
>>18655159Remember that the journalist who said she confessed to him that she made it up said she did it when he was changing the tapes and for some reason didn't bother to repeat herself when the new tape was ready or say the same thing to any other journalists? And then the same journalist was arrested for storming and barricading himself inside a school to demand that black students be bussed around the city to schools in white neighborhoods?
>>18655255He was quite happy to set his Carter Ruck, a very expensive (as in 6k per letter expensive) and very intimidating law firm specialising in shutting up journalists and whistleblowers who are telling the truth, and then the police, on the journalist politely asking him to verify a few things about his borderline fantasy life story.
>>18655714fucking hell it's trueThis forced bussing thing is something straight out of Turner Diaries. It's crazy this actually used to be a thing in America and everyone thinks it's normal
>>18655702He also got numerous media appearances, a lucrative job, people fawning over him saying he's the best in the world and paid a million pounds for the publishing rights to his biography. I wish someone would exploit me like that...
>>18655719>Black children should get less sleep and get up earlier just so they can be Fedex-ed to white schools instead of making sure the schools near them are just as good.>I am very woke.
>>18655719>>18655723Back then it was extremely unpopular, but naturally as the generations pass it actually won the argument. I'll never forget in the 2020 Democratic primary debates when Biden talked about how bad bussing was Kamala chimped out at him and said they were good, and *she* was the one who got praised by everyone for that exchange.
>>18655719>forced bussing
>>18655719>>18655723>>18655737I found it - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1OvDB_wavII don't remember it being this bad. Obviously Biden was a chickenshit here and was squirming and even said he didn't "totally oppose bussing", but it's jarring to know how absolutely despised that policy was when it was actually implemented by everyone including liberals, and then seeing it being hailed and praised on the national stage like this decades later.
>>18655719it was based on the idea that was popular at the time that IQ was mainly a product of environment and if black students were put in white schools it would raise them to white kids' IQ level.
>>18655948Why not just..make black schools better?
>>18655159Think of all the women he would have robbed and raped in his little jigaboo life if only them good ol' boys hadn't killed him... truly sad...
>>18655951How? The Kansas City experiment in the 90's poured money into black schools, and they were still violent and terrible.
>>18656642We need to pay blacks just for existing
>>18655159That boy, just like his Daddy, got what he deserved
Had Emmitt Till lived, nobody would know his name. Instead he gets an entire room in the national African American History Museum. Some people are truly more important in death than in life. Not that I mind. Death to white supremacy.
>>18655171obsessed
>>18655255he was an insane narcissist.
>>18655222Prager U.What's adorable are the people that in less than 30 seconds say "nigger is just a word, don't get so upset about it" but will go on to defend abducting a 14 year old at gun point, mutilating and killing him, for whistling at a white woman.
>>18656766I don't trust your source, but I do find it interesting that you are not one to completely to subscribe to the ideas espoused by Prager U.I personally posted something that gets into what possibly happened.>Some witnesses stated that one of the other boys dared Till to talk to the store’s cashier, Carolyn Bryant, a white woman. It was reported that Till then whistled at, touched the hand or waist of, or flirted with the woman as he was leaving the store. Whatever the truth, Till did not mention the incident to his great-uncleMy source is britannica.
>>18656766>>18656833Also, this is my post >>18655372.
>>18656766>Prager UOpinion discardedGet a better source
>>18656766>What's adorable are the people that in less than 30 seconds say "nigger is just a word, don't get so upset about it"Dennis Prager actually said something to that extent once.
>>18656848>>18656833>>18656870NTA, I was being sarcastic about the Prager U source. I figured my next line about white people chimping out about a whistle would have made that clear.
>>18656890Genuinely I see the words "Prager U" in response to a source and I don't bother reading the rest of the postApologies anon
prager u is one of those boogeymen that i only ever hear discussed in the context of liberals complaining about its misinformation and how many chuds it has brainwashed, without ever once encountering someone in the wild engaging with it positively.it's like when someone hears I'm american and starts complaining about "megachurches" as if that's something I'm supposed to be aware of. I don't think I've ever even seen a picture of a megachurch. Maybe once or twice when Barnes and Nobles was around, I saw a Joel Osteen book, and my mom told me he was a scammer. That's the extent of it. Yet from the way people talk about them you'd think they were this behemoth of a cultural force.
>>18656952Go to Utah they infest the place
>>18656972mormon temples are a different thing entirely.
>>18656890I had that suspicion. But, I thought to bring up the counter narrative anyway.It's strangely isn't too different. But, still different.But, at the same time inconclusive.
>>18656952>Yet from the way people talk about them you'd think they were this behemoth of a cultural force.That's the egregore. People who are the actual driver of forced discourse pretending other people are the ones driving it. It's how Hollywood actors and singers get to play the underdog saying "no one is illegal on stolen land".
>>18656952>>18657032Doesn't this come with the idea that Prager U isn't an actual influential entity?Like, I might not have encountered anyone out there that actually watches any of it. Then again, I don't get out much anyway. But, even with that said I've heard things. Like Prager U trying to get into classrooms and in some instances succeeding.
>>18656766I don't think nigger is just a word and that they shouldn't get upset about it. What's twisted about the current-day dynamic is that *only* the nigger word is allowed to trigger a proper hostility reaction from its target. There used to be times where honorable behavior was expected in public and you couldn't just say or do whatever you liked, and there would be consequences if you stepped out of line. Emmett Till the rowdy teenager faced the consequences.
>be black>get sent down to the deepest cottonpicking south to learn manners>immediately a molest married womanSorry he got kill but things were not going to go easy for him no matter what.
>>18657143I don't think bludgeoning someone to death and mutilating their body is appropriate punishment for catcalling anonAt most it warrants a slap
>>18657145Foreigners get harsher treatment as they're less trustworthy, another fact of life which secular humanists suppressed.
>>18657145It wasn't just catcalling, he was sexually assaulting a woman.
>>18657143For some reason 'kike' doesn't get this treatment? I thought it did. Same with 'spic' and 'gook.'Probably not to the exact extent, but pretty similar. Especially 'kike.'
>>18657148According to britannica it was groping of the hand and or waist and whistling and or flirting. All of which are hearsay lending to nothing conclusive.
>>18657154>All of which are hearsayExcept it was the testimony of the woman who was sexually assaulted. You don't even know what hearsay means.
>>18657154She claimed he grabbed her waist you retarded nigger.
He also told her "i've been with white women before" bringing the irony full-circle as Till himself was the first to bring racial tensions into the equation.
>>18657155The testimony which she then recantedTouching someone in a non-sexual way is not sexual assault. How do you grope a hand anyway?
>>18657160She never recanted her testimony which has been discussed in this thread already.>completely ignoring him grabbing her waistKill yourself nigger.
>>18657160>The testimony which she then recantedNow this is what's called hearsay, retard child.
>In 2017, historian and author Timothy Tyson claimed that during a 2008 interview with him Carolyn Bryant retracted her testimony that Till had grabbed her around her waist and uttered obscenities. Bryant and her daughter-in-law, who were present during Tyson's interviews, disagreed, stating that she never recanted. The jury did not hear Bryant's testimony at the trial as the judge had ruled it inadmissible, but the court spectators heard. The defense wanted Bryant's testimony as evidence for a possible appeal in case of a conviction. Tyson also reported that Bryant said she could not remember the rest of the events that occurred between her and Till in the grocery store, but said that: "nothing that boy did could ever justify what happened to him.">An editorial in The New York Times said, regarding Bryant's alleged admission that portions of her testimony were false: "This admission is a reminder of how black lives were sacrificed to white lies in places like Mississippi. It also raises anew the question of why no one was brought to justice in the most notorious racially motivated murder of the 20th century, despite an extensive investigation by the F.B.I.">The New York Times quoted Wheeler Parker, a cousin of Till's, who said: "I was hoping that one day she would admit it, so it matters to me that she did, and it gives me some satisfaction. It's important to people understanding how the word of a white person against a black person was law, and a lot of black people lost their lives because of it. It really speaks to history, it shows what black people went through in those days.">The U.S. Department of Justice reopened the investigation into Till's death in '17. Tyson's account of the alleged recantation wasn't considered credible by the DOJ due to numerous inconsistencies and financial motives and the investigation was closed in '21 stating "There is insufficient evidence to prove that she ever told the professor that any part of her testimony was untrue".
>>18657166>a lot of black people lost their lives because of it. It really speaks to history, it shows what black people went through in those daysMore black people have been killed by other black people since Civil Rights than have ever been lynched by whites. Not just more, but more by orders of magnitude.
>>18657155>>18657156I'm just going with what is said here:>>18655372Take it up with britannica.
>>18657179Usually when people are shown they're wrong they just go silent, which is fine as we know it can feel humiliating to admit you were wrong. But impotently appealing to authority one last time is just pathetic.
>>18655230dread it, run from it. destiny still arrives all the same
>>18657181>he has this saved on his computerBoy you are a spiraling mess.
>>18657183god bless america
>>18657180I was citing where I drew what I said from.I'm not wrong with what I'm saying. It is in essence what it said there.Make of it what you will.
>>18657189Incidentally, this is what fbi.gov says>In the summer of 1955, 14-year-old African-American Emmett Till had gone on vacation from Chicago to visit family in Money, Mississippi. He was shopping at a store owned by Roy and Carolyn Bryant—and someone said he possibly whistled at Mrs. Bryant, a white woman>and someone said he possibly whistled at Mrs. BryantThe FBI under Kash Patel. Under Trump.
>>18657189>>18657191The Smithsonian says this.>The alleged teasing of white store clerk Carolyn Bryant
>>18657189>>18657191>>18657192Oh, wait. There was more from the Smithsonian.>Bryant Grocery store and said, “Bye, baby” over his shoulder to Carolyn Bryant as he exited the store>Carolyn Bryant testified in court that Till had grabbed her hand, and after she pulled away, he followed her behind the counter, clasped her waist, and using vulgur language, told her that he had been with white women before. At 82, some 60 years later, Bryant, confessed to Duke University professor Timothy B. Tyson that she had lied about this entire event.
>>18657189>>18657191>>18657192>>18657197>proven wrong already>appealing to authority even more nowYou are all over the place. All you're doing is providing us with useful material for "official sources" being mass peddlers of black sob stories at this point. Do go on.
>>18657189>>18657191>>18657192>>18657197Missed this little detail.>purchased two-cents worth of bubble gum from the Not that it matters.
>>18657200What's wrong with the official sources?>da joosI don't know what fucking sources you use, but Prager U is a definite no go for me.
>>18657202>gum was 2 cents before Bidenflation
>>18657206We're talking about 1950s. Biden like turned 20.
>>18657205What's wrong is that you were definitively proven wrong already in this thread. Till's victim did state he grabbed her waist and told her "i've been with white women before", and she never recanted her testimony. The Smithsonian sugarcoating his actions doesn't make his actions go away, no matter how "official" their report may seem to you.
>>18657205The official story doesn't make any logical sense. The town was 30% black, so it's not like people got killed there just for being black. Logically (and what I suspect happened) is that he fondled/molested the lady, got caught, and then continued behaving arrogantly after being confronted. He came from Chicago and probably tried to act like a Chicago street kid, which was the wrong way to handle that situation. Instead of apologizing and taking his medicine, he went on the attack, and got ended. That narrative makes the most sense given all of the other known facts, and the setting.
>>18657197>60 years later, Bryant, confessed to Duke University professor Timothy B. Tyson that she had lied about this entire event.Do you understand you're only proving the point here? The Smithsonian is presenting Tyson's hearsay as fact. You are literally showing how official sources are being malicious and dishonest.
>>18657216>were definitively proven wrong already in this threadHow?I haven't been given any source.Even when i requested it here >>18655222.The Smithsonian and FBI may not have said much pertaining to the charge, but Britannica gave more and even then didn't state anything definitively on that front.
>>18657219>You are literally showing how official sources are being malicious and dishonestIn contrast to what?All this time I'm being told my sources are wrong, but am never given a source to the contrary.
>>18657217>The town was 30% black, so it's not like people got killed there just for being black. Logically (and what I suspect happened) is that he fondled/molested the lady, got caught, and then continued behaving arrogantly after being confronted.>He came from Chicago and probably tried to act like a Chicago street kid, which was the wrong way to handle that situation. Instead of apologizing and taking his medicine, he went on the attack, and got endedI'll give you this much compared to the others I've replied to, at least you're giving me a deduction and not just plain out telling me my sources are dishonest or whatever shit.Do I take much credence to your deduction? Not necessarily.I can't argue much against it aside from sources not suggesting it as such.I guess the real question here is, how little could he had done to still illicit this same response.
>muh official sources>muh OFFICIAL sources>it's just a biased dictionary article
>>18657234From PBS>Emmett goes into the store to buy bubble gum. Some of the kids outside the store will later say they heard Emmett whistle at Carolyn Bryant.These trusted sources are all pretty much like this.I don't know what you want from me.None of them are saying anything about Tyson pulling some fast one or whatever fucking shit.What source would say that?
>>18657221Till grabbing Bryant by the waist and making obscene suggestive remarks to her is a matter of fact, which she has not recanted.Your spiraling sperging out started by claiming that>the claims were based on "hearsay" rather than Bryant's claimsthen>he merely brushed her hand, that's not molestationRefusing to engage with him grabbing her waist even though it was already laid out to you. Then>that Bryant recanted her testimonyAfter that, you started incoherently quoting "official sources" all over the place as if that would make the truth go away. Bryant's testimony has not been lost to time - https://news.wttw.com/sites/default/files/article/file-attachments/till%20transcript%20pages%201-249.pdfOn page 38 you will find a report summarizing Bryant's testimony by the FBI. >she held her hand out for him to place the money>instead he caught her hand with a strong grip and said "how about a date, baby?" and she had to jerk it back to free herself>he then went behind the counter and grabbed her by the waist, saying "what's the matter baby, can't take it?">he then used explicit language, including "*an uprintable word* with white women before". Again, she never recanted this version of events. The 14 year-old rowdy teenager Emmett Till molested her behind that counter.
>>18657243>None of them are saying anything about Tyson pulling some fast one or whatever fucking shit.There is no record of Bryant recanting her story, only Tyson's hearsay. His conflict of interest is already laid out on this thread and in his own Wikipedia page.
>>18657245Resident niggerlover unironically contributing to thsi thread by showing how disgustingly eager mainstream sources are to run cover for a pervert dreg of society because he's black.
This thread makes me sad
>>18655159You may not like it but he committed sin against God by, as a black man, propositioning a white Christian woman. The righteous punishment for him was death, and that was what he received.
This thread makes me hated joggers/darkie
>>18657248Tyson's narrative can be considered debunked on the following basis - both state and federal authorities were trying to build a criminal case against Bryant for years. But none was ever filed. Due to lack of evidence.This implies quite strongly that Bryant never 'recanted' her original story to investigators (had she recanted, they could and would have filed a case against her). It also strongly implies that Tyson had no actual evidence of his claims - he was interviewed by authorities, but never produced any kind of recording or other documentary evidence that Bryant 'recanted' anything.In other words, the only source for his claim is "Just trust me, bro!" But why SHOULD we trust him?
>>18657160Your performance overall in this thread has been pathetic, but I'd say this was your worst post. How undignified must it be to brazenly lie in order to defend sexual assault, just to own the racist Southerners? People like Till were and are uncivilized animals, but your kind are distinctly depraved in your evil.
>>18656642To this day the highest-funded schools per pupil in the entire country are shitty black schools.
>>18657270where is that in your bible?
>>18656766>>18656890Well this aged like milk. Dunking on Prager U only for his precious Britannica and Smithsonian to be exposed as the dishonest and malicious actors they are.
>>18657300da suvern bybuljesus hates dem blacks doncha knodon need ta reed it ta no its dere
>>18657197>At 82, some 60 years later, Bryant, confessed to Duke University professor Timothy B. Tyson that she had lied about this entire event.She did not. See >>18655714
Today on /his/, anons discover that historical events have multiple narratives and perspectives and promptly lose their shit
>>18657320Cop-out. There was a testimony by the victim, false claims about said testimony being recanted, and the sexual assailant's personal friends saying it was only a whistle. These are the only narratives to consider. With these in mind, the coverage of this case by the reputable official sources is nothing short of malicious.
>>18657320Today on /his/ nigger lovers lie through their teeth and ditch the #BelieveWomen schtick the second one of their pets is threatened.
>>18657322>>18657335Now kiss
>>18657344Believe women anon.
>>18657348You gotta stop taking my bait manIt's too easy to rile you up
>>18657335>>18657348I don't understand why people try to bring up this gotcha. The implication here is that Bryant, a married woman in the 1950's who told first thing to her husband what happened to her and later testified in court in his defense, is equivalent to a 21-century woman who regrets having sex and uses that to ruin a man's life in the court of public opinion. There is no equivalence here, #believeallwomen is retarded AND Till groped Bryant.
>>18657245>Till grabbing Bryant by the waist and making obscene suggestive remarks to her is a matter of factNo.It's a fact that it was her testimony but it's not a fact. It's not even necessarily the truth.>the claims were based on "hearsay" rather than Bryant's claimsThat's because my initial analysis in Britannica does not even bring up Carolyn's testimony. Most of the sources I cited didn't bring it up either. So, while an omission on their part, it also lends to the idea that there is more than just her testimony. >Refusing to engage with him grabbing her waistI did say that though. Here: >>18657154>grope>or waistIt's even said in the original paragraph from Britannica: >>18655372.>touch>or waistThe only difference is I said "grope" instead of 'touch.'>After that, you started incoherently quoting "official sources">"official sources" It's weird that you make that quote. I didn't started saying that until you did and in retrospect, it doesn't make sense. They're not 'official'. They're trusted sources. But, they are at least sources. Which is more than what I was getting other than just being told than I'm wrong.As for the link with the testimony. That doesn't really conflict with any of the the sources. A couple of them either bring up or state something to the extent. Maybe not using the exact same language.>Again, she never recanted this version of eventsAlright, then cite that, like >>18657248 did.>>18657248>wikipediaThat's not great. But, okay. It looks like things are cited.>His conflict of interest is already laid out on this threadMind giving posts?
>>18655159>poor white kid from Mississippi moves to south Chicago>sees attractive black girl>has enough of a sense of self-preservation not to catcall and subsequently chase her, thus avoiding a Darwin Award
>>18657417>>Till grabbing Bryant by the waist and making obscene suggestive remarks to her is a matter of factNo.It's a fact that it was her testimony but it's not a fact. It's not even necessarily the truth.Moving the goalposts. What you just wrote doesn't justify the horrid things you said in the following posts:>>18656766 - "he was just whistling at her">>18656890 - "white people chimping out about a whistle">>18657145 - "punishment for catcalling">>18657160 - "The testimony which she then recanted", "How do you grope a hand anyway?">That's because my initial analysis in Britannica does not even bring up Carolyn's testimony. Most of the sources I cited didn't bring it up either. So, while an omission on their part, it also lends to the idea that there is more than just her testimony.>As for the link with the testimony. That doesn't really conflict with any of the the sources. A couple of them either bring up or state something to the extent. Maybe not using the exact same language.It's called obfuscation, misleading and lying by omission which for some reason you are perfectly fine with. You admit to their flawed reports misleading you into ignoring her testimony. Otherwise, why would you even bring them up to contradict the claim while saying only "PragerU" or whatever would say he sexually assaulted her? Because their reports were maliciously framed, in particular their glowing mention of the testimony being "recanted".>Mind giving posts?>>18655714>>18655719
>>18657423>but doesn't have enough sense to not call her nigger, or immediately assume she's going to commit a crime or get violent and possibly preemptively assault her or call the police on her or assume that she's lazy and stupid and just plain out think less of her
>>18657423>>18657434>or think of her as uppity for even expressing the slightest bit of frustration
>>18657434>>18657435lol you reminded me of that time Democrats praised a picture of a black woman sitting "bravely" in a train full of Patriot Front members then it turned out she was a schizo
Guys just look at how blacks have acted in the usa for the last 50 half a century and more and it is obvious that he did it and thankfully was put down before he could kill some innocent person like the countless other unstable low iq psycho blacks.
>>18657243>From PBSnigga....
>>18655159FAFO
Ahhh who tf cares. Blacks have far exceeded all white on black crimes since then.
>>18657300The new covenant isn't an enumeration of prohibitions, its the deification and sanctification of a holy people, the children of God who form the light of God in Christ. Dark hell-spawned demons should never have been extended the rights of God's children.
>>18657554You're going to have this post read back to you over and over as you sink into the fire. Hope it was worth it!
>>18657590>>18657218>If believers go to heaven when they die to be with ChristThey don't, after death fantasy lands are heretical nonsense.>why did Paul said they fell asleep?Because they believed they had been imparted with a soul that would be called on again to serve its function within the heavenly kingdom which the Son established upon the earth. A soul is just something like a job title, gatekeeper for example, and those with them are merely stewards during their lifetimes.
>>18655255he wasn't retarded, he was a fraud who abused his "persecuted minority" status to steal credentials and silence critics. He realized his life was over since lying was the only thing he was good at, the world is better off without him
>>18657645nothing changed either. Oxbridge will still enforce DEI, police wrongspeak, and selecting against intelligence and creativity in the humanities.The real people who need to learn their lesson are Cofnas and other "post-liberals" who despite their heterodox beliefs, dedicate their lives to shucking and jiving and playing villain for liberals who hate them and want them strung up.It's not fun or cute any more when someone like Cofnas turns around and goes, "but the chuds are bad too! They don't believe in global warming or vaccines!"HBD post-liberals never use the intelligence their so proud of to do a simple Nash equilibrium and realize the only favorable future for them is one where the chuds win politically, because in chudverse you can survive as anti-DEI and pro-vaccine, but in libverse you can't.
>>18657433>>>18656766 - "he was just whistling at her">>>18656890 - "white people chimping out about a whistle">>>18657145 - "punishment for catcalling">>>18657160 - "The testimony which she then recanted", "How do you grope a hand anyway?"I didn't say any of those things.>It's called obfuscation, misleading and lying by omission which for some reason you are perfectly fine withI'm trying to build a profile of the case by drawing from different sources and presenting them.>while saying only "PragerU" or whatever would say he sexually assaulted her?No. I Just plain out don't trust Prager U and would prefer to not have that as a source.>>18655714>>18655719Those don't bring up his conflict of interest. One of those is about something altogether different.At any rate, I'm not on trial here and I'm not everyone that's stating a counter narrative.In the end, we have Carolyn's testimony and other accounts.What we don't have is Emmett's account.
>>18658138>Those don't bring up his conflict of interest. One of those is about something altogether different.They bring up that he was a deranged activist who broke into a school because he wanted it to support forced busing. He had a clear motive to lie about Bryant's "recantment". Coupled with the DOJ and FBI concluding there was no evidence for her recanting, your precious Smithsonian still presenting it as fact should make them as unreliable to you as the big bad PragerU.
>>18658172Okay. So did Emmett deserved to be murdered?
>>18655199He probably did it but it shouldn't have been a death sentence.
>>18658185I guess that depends on whether you think sex pests deserve to be killed.Did you know black men were in his lynching party?
>>18656952same with neo-Nazis. nobody has ever actually met those IRL even though they're a favorite liberal boogeyman.
>>18658201>I guess that depends on whether you think sex pests deserve to be killedNo. I'm not a barbarian. At the very least if there should be any lynching, then at the very least one that's not extra judicial.But, I'm asking you. What do YOU think?>Did you know black men were in his lynching partyI don't care if the former King of Siam was there.He would have been dead by then, but still.
>>18658185Did he deserve it? Absolutely. It would have been preferable if he was dealt with by the state, nevertheless it would have been a travesty to convict those men, particularly Bryant's husband.
>>18658239but you do care if black men were there because it was white on black, not Siamese, violence.
>>18658185>Okay.Yeah you just spent an entire thread fellating the "official sources" while fearmongering about PragerU and this is how you end it when it turns out you were blindly following the words of propagandists. Terrible.
>>18658241Even the eye gauging?
>>18655159>The source for the woman lying is a false repudiation fabricated by a journalist Woah.....
>>18658298Even when it's not ideal, by virtue of his actions he rendered the difference negligible. In contrast, in Bryant's experience the difference between the so-called "whistling" and him grabbing her by the waist was all too significant.
>>18658249I guess you just don't get the meaning of that turn of phrase.
>>18657465You're probably schizo too.
>>18658325>the so-called "whistling"Which is mentioned quite a few times here >>18657429and>>18657430
>>18658350We know already, Till's brothas vouched for him.
>>18658325>and speculated that [] may have made the story up stating "...the only way I can figure is is that she did not want to take care of the store. She thought this wild story would make Roy take care of the store instead of leavin' her with the kids and the store. That is a [] point of view." "...the only thing to me that would upset her would be if she wanted Roy to stay at the store more..." A review of Jaunita Milam's trial testimony reveals she did not make any statements, nor was she questioned about, the incident at the store or her presence at Bryant's Grocery & Meat Market on the day Till whistled at Carolyn Bryant-Donham
Remember when black people never lied to cover up for other blacks?
>>18658363Cousins.
>>18658201>>18658241>>18658325If we had more guys like you, maybe a sex pest wouldn't have become president.
>>18658365>speculated Wow it's fucking nothing. Listen man, your official sources got clowned on. They made you believe the only accusation was about hand-grabbing and that she recanted her testimony. You went to the mat to defend their honor and only ended up with eggs on your face. Let it go.
>>18658413Wow that's crazy, get rid of him. Still not supporting desegregation and mass immigration.
>>18658371Dey all brothas nigga.
>>18655228>>18655255>Also scrutinised was Arday's claim that a pig's head had been sent to his parents' home and that the Metropolitan Police had identified the butchers' shop from which the pig had been purchased. >The Guardian found no supporting evidence of these claims, with the Metropolitan Police denying that an investigation had taken place and the butchers' shop in question relating that no police officers had ever visited. >In response to these reports, Arday stood by his account, saying: "To be honest with you, I thought you'd just believe me. Why would I lie?">"To be honest with you, I thought you'd just believe me. Why would I lie?"LMAO
>>18658456Can hardly blame him, that's what he was used to his entire career.
>>18658346>no u Come on bro. How come you can never find a clear-cut case of a normal one? Till? Sexual assault.Floyd? Armed robbery.Random ass woman in a train? Indecent exposure.The closest thing to normal you had was that Breonna girl and even she dated a drug dealer.
Reminder that Epstein's "victims" were all willing participants.
>>18658427I actually got that from >>18657427. Which is in: >>18657245>https://news.wttw.com/sites/default/files/article/file-attachments/till%20transcript%20pages%201-249.pdf
>>18658494The same could be said of 4channers.
>>18658661Yeah, and it says your big smoking gun witness was just speculating. Intrasexual competition is a hell of a drug. Are you done batting for proven malicious sources now?
>>18658566>sex pests should be able to subsist in civilized societyNo.For some reason the logic is to allow them to go free? There's no inbetween? It has to be further than fucking Norway?
>>18658566>His story reminds me of Epstein.>Epstein was allowed to rape people because the system protected him and ordinary people (like you) thought that disobeying the letter of the law would've made themselves more immoral than a literal child rapist>comparing an alleged teenage sex pest to a billionaire rapistThese are not nearly in the same ball park.Holy Jesus.So, are you honestly telling me, that the system in fucking segregated rural Mississippi would have protected Emmett? Are you fucking kidding me?
>>18658672Same segregated Mississippi which took the husband of Till's victim to trial.
>>18658663>smoking gunI was thinking more like muddy water.
>>18658691It's... so goddamned jarring to compare these two.You're willing to reconcile with that gulf.But, you're going to have to excuse me for not willing to. That's just simply way to fucking much for me, thank you.
>>18658696I'm not the anon who brought up Epstein, but yeah I'm not surprised you don't give a damn about what Till did because your kind sees dregs like him as misunderstood Aladdins who can have no wrong motivation.
>>18658709Really?I've touched on what has been alleged of Till in multiple sources. Hell, I've even taken to account the exact allegations levied by fucking Carolyn herself. What I haven't done even remotely much of is spoken of what Roy did.But, somehow I'm being seen as holding Till up to sainthood.You're a maniac. Leave me alone you fucking troglodyte!
>>18658722Your whole spiraling started with claiming all poor little Till did was the equivalent of a white person saying nigger. You had to be dragged through the case to even realize he touched her waist and not just her hand.
>>18658728>You had to be dragged through the case to even realize he touched her waist and not just her handI STARTED WITH THAT YOU FUCKING IDIOT!>>18657154>groping of the hand and or waist>or waistYou're too stupid to talk to me. Leave me alone.
>>18658751No, it was>According to britannica it was groping of the hand and or waist and whistling and or flirting. All of which are hearsay lending to nothing conclusive.Then later quoting the all-knowing ever-reliable Smithsonian:> At 82, some 60 years later, Bryant, confessed to Duke University professor Timothy B. Tyson that she had lied about this entire event.And you still run cover for them. Slimy worm.
>>18658755>And you still run cover for them. Slimy worm.I asked for a counter source.We've been through this. I'm not doing it again.Shoo!
>>18658757Bryant's testimony, and the falsehood of her "recantment" story have already been established in this thread before you even popped up. I'm curious, if you were so eager for sources, why was the first thing you looked up is someone to spoonfeed you a story-driven narrative of the case instead of directly looking for the contents of her testimony?
>>18658762The case is about Emmett Till.THIS VERY FUCKING THREAD IS ABOUT EMMETT TILL.DO YOU SEE THE FUCKING OP?!DO YOU?! DO YOU?!
>>18658770Bryant's testimony was in the very trial of her husband regarding Till's well-deserved death, retard anon.
>>18658780It's barely a footnote in major sources and even when accounted for directly is still an allegation in the end given allowing with the record is this >>18657427 account which muddies the water.You're crucifying me for not treating it as gospel.
>>18658828>it's barely a footnote in major sourcesNo anon, it *is* the major source. Bryant's testimony holds more weight to the consideration of this case than the Smithsonian's official narrative, surely you understand how straightforward that is right? The Smithsonian reducing it to a footnote only reflects upon the Smithsonian's conduct and reliability.And I see you still cling to the speculations and vouchings from some woman and Till's brothas, that's adorable but Bryant's testimony is still the single biggest piece of information from the trial. She describes in detail what happened (Juanita Milan meanwhile admitted she wasn't even present in the store) while Da Brothas all gave evasive answers like "I wasn't there the whole time but when I walked in everything was fine teehee". And she never recanted the testimony.
>>18655159One of those cases where even if you don't deserve to get killed for it, who is really surprised? It's like if a white guy went to the ghetto, called everyone a nigger, and got killed - nobody would care.
>>18658848Well, the alleged perpetrator didn't get to have a trail. So, it's only really her word along with a few others.Regardless of how robust her testimony is, it can never be anything more than an account. It doesn't help that there is no evidence. No semen. Nothing.We can't say this is a well rounded case.It is flawed and is largely overshadowed by the killing of the alleged perpetrator.I consider this an impasse. I think I've learned as much nuance about this case and have argued the murkiness of it.There's no point in me continuing.On your point you'd just want to lambast me and others and possibly you here would argue why Black people are subhuman dregs.I am done.
>>18658138I simply don't believe that you were different anons. That "he" would smugly bring up PragerU for no reason and them lecture people about sources, then "you" show up and spam 5 different accounts from major sources? Were you just really passionately inspired by "his" posts or something? No, more likely that you were the same guy who equated what Till did to saying the N word and you wanted to distance yourself from that after it was shown to you exactly what he did.
>>18658877Still refusing to address the Smithsonian brazenly lying about Bryant recanting her testimony. This right after you had the audacity to claim that "major sources" are more important than the testimony itself.
>>18658342the phrase was inapplicable because you do care about the identity of the perpetrators
>>18655199Either way the point of bringing this up is to scare white women into not reporting rape. People will be skeptical if the female is white and the male is black. Like to whole notion of not calling the cops on black people. Social justice is about revenge. They weasel around this by claiming broadly that White people have privilege, equality feels like oppression to the privileged, black people had it worse, so don't complain, etcetera etcetera. If they claim it broadly then they can deny it when looking at individual cases. Social justice advocates promote an ideology that uses past events and generalizes a race to justify present day mistreatment. Basically what their ideology is saying is that if someone's grandmother was raped and it severely impacted their lineage, then her grandson could rape the rapists granddaughter and it would be justice. You could swap this with robbery or any injustice/crime. It's actually worse because by generalizing all white people, they're applying it to everyone no matter how long ago it was or if their family actually harmed anyone. It's this kind of commie logic: it's okay to rob someone who lives in a multi million dollar house because they probably acquired the money by fucking people over. It's the most immoral framework and it's not logical either.
>>18658990Oh yeah it's totally the left which discourages women from reporting rape and not the manosphere incel right.
>>18657143Exactly. It's not about the word, but that they're creating rules for certain people, but not others. It also is disingenuous because they complain if people defend themselves from thieves. They're very upset if a victim takes it too far, but they have zero problems if a black person beats the shit out of a white person for saying the word nigger or calling them a nigger. There's no equivalent for anyone else. There's fighting words i guess, but odds are they call you a psycho for beating someone badly over it. I genuinely think they would give a black person a pass for severely harming someone. Their mentality is that if you say the word, what happens next is your fault and basically fuck around and find out. You can't have a society where one group gets to act like that and others don't. Same goes for other social etiquette. You know they would hesitate to tell a bunch of black people to be respectful if they were being loud. By not treating everyone equally and giving a pass for anti social behavior they promote societal decay. Ironic that progressives think they could create and maintain some sort of utopia based on European ideals. The second too many black people have to be told to act right, they'll cry racism and it goes right down the drain. Progressives are only capable of policing whites and other races according to their hierarchy in the oppression pyramid.
>>18658990>>18659007Just now the Public Defender service is seeking to abolish the felon in possession in charge which would de facto make it almost impossible to put violent criminals in prison.
>>18655159the average modern woman would want any non-chad whistling at them lynched too
>>18659007>>18658990There's literally no evidence of this. Rape is pretty harshly condemned across the board and I hear people talk all the time about how victims of any race didn't feel protected or how evidence was mishandled etc. The exception seems to be opponents of prison reform and human rights, who seem to absolutely love rape and sexual abuse as a method of terror.
>>18657181Plaza taking BBC would be such a mindbreaker... if she wasn't an old woman and used up now lol, have at her, Carmichael!
>>18659470>opponents of prison reformLmao people calling for prison reform defend rapists the most. You are pro-rape gangs.
>>18660572Prison reformers usually don't defend what inmates have done especially if it's rape or 1st degree murder. The usual target is excessive sentencing, torture/mistreatment/neglect, or lack of effort at rehabilitation for those eligible.
>>18660625https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_purpose_of_a_system_is_what_it_doesYou are pro-criminal.
>>18660629What the hell is this supposed to mean? Seems like a way to avoid asking or considering questions.
>>18660572It would take prison reform to end the rape in prison.Also who do you think groomer gangs would work for? Activists? Or your "elected" reps? You people side with every interest wealth asks of you. You would kidnap the children yourselves if you thought it would make some bluehair unhappy.
>>18660634Your precious lenient judges routinely lead to violent criminals being back on the streets and re-offending. You are pro-criminal.>>18660637Well any change to the justice system counts as "reform" but we all know what you mean by prison reform. You want to give them anger management courses, I just want to kill the bastards.
>>18660648I don't know what you're saying. Judges legally aren't at fault if the offender reoffends after release. They can't and generally shouldn't impose the maximum sentence in every case, and they don't run the prisons. And even if prisons are meant to rehabilitate they can't save everyone, look at Norway or Denmark. Nowhere has a recidivism rate of 0%
Bryant was a victim of Chicago negro rape culture and I'm tired of pretending she wasn't.
>>18660650>look at norway or denmarkNorway and Denmark don't have a permanent underclass of violent monsters in their inner cities.
he wouldnt have graduated anyways. doesnt matter.
>>18660723You miss the point. I meant to say they don't have 0% recidivism despite rehabilitative systems. You can't fix everyone, and that's not necessarily the fault of the system.
>>18658298>gauginglook, you may have retired from the position of 'she recanted!!!' to 'but did he deserve it???' without any of the expected intermediate steps, but that still would not have the key 'a' get any closer to 'o' on your keyboard. unless you went to a school for blacks and genuinely cannot spell 'gouging'.
>>18660650>Judges legally aren't at fault if the offender reoffends after release. >legallyweasel wording.
>>18657356>why would people point out that those using the #BelieveWomen are massive hypocrites when it comes to believing women in a high profile case where the attacker is a black man?
>>18660958It's a great argument when you focus on #believeallwomen specifically, but this thread is about Emmett Till, so bringing up #believeallwomen here is a poor argument since you're still making a concession that Till dindu nuffin.
>>18660968Fuck me you're stupid. A woman said Till did it. So believe the woman.
>>18660974Okay so the other side agrees to your trade and affirms #believeallwomen, now what?
>>18660995Then we all agree Till did it.
>>18660996While affirming #believeallwomen, the thing you brought up to dunk on.
>>18661000Yes, believe women when they say black men attacked them.
>>18660955It's true though. You can't sue a judge for negligence if they don't impose life w/o parole and someone reoffends. That's not even the case in jurisdictions where the prosecution can appeal the initial sentence.
>>18660723Literally every country has an underclass, and it's usually not limited to cities. In Canada it's worse in some rural areas.
>>18655255retardation and autism are two different things and I wish people would stop conflating the two. one is mental the other is neurological.
>>18656695you are probably jewish
>>18661554And your parents are probably related.
>>18655159He wasn't going to finish high school anyway.
