[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: taiwan.jpg (69 KB, 529x579)
69 KB JPG
Why did Taiwan never develop nuclear weapons, historically speaking?
>>
>>18656447
Because doing so would provoke a preemptive nuclear strike by China or Russia or North Korea
>>
At one point the US planned to station nuclear weapons on Taiwan, but I doubt the Taiwanese would've ever had the capability to make nuclear weapons themselves for most of the Cold War. I think a lot of people don't know or forget the fact that most of East Asia was dirt poor and underdeveloped until the last quarter of the 20th century.
>>
>>18656447
they were backed up by the US so to them there really wasn't a point since nukes can be expensive to maintain and they weren't really larping as a great power, at least in the same way Britain and France were, granted with the US going full retard at the moment, you might see a future were a bunch of states start seriously flirting with the idea of developing their own nukes as extra insurance
>>
>>18656447
Taiwan had a secret nuclear weapons program but one of the directors sold the info to the CIA and fled to America in 1987. The US forced Taiwan to shut the program down because it would be a geopolitical headache.
>>18657224
The Taiwanese program succeeded in testing a
nuclear explosion in 1986, but they couldn't make a bomb small enough deliverable before the program was forced to be shut down.
>>
>>18656447
There is a hard limit of how chickenshit your country can be before getting your own nuclear weapons becomes impossible. Nuclear programs are expensive, idemanding ntellectually and economically plus politically frowned upon. To do so you either need to be:
>geopolitical superpower (USA, USSR) or an aligned major secondary power (UK, France, China)
>Middle to large nation using foreign help (South Africa, Israel) or repurposing previous nuclear capability (India) or monomanically pursuing that goal (Pakistan).
>Tin-pot dictatorship mono-maniacally pursuing said goal through thick and thin no matter the cost and using foreign support whenever possible (Norh Korea).
Even during the harshest KMT years Taiwan didn't have the capacity to go as hard as North Korea did. The Eastern bloc would likely intervene if Taiwan attempted to get the bomb and the U.S would not support it.
>>
File: yellow4.jpg (3.42 MB, 5100x7700)
3.42 MB JPG
>>18656447
YELLOW PERIL
>>
>>18656454
>China or Russia or North Korea
Wouldn't make them the aggressor?
>>
>>18656447
The USA itself prevented it.
Nobody wants to see the two Chinas going apeshit and throwing atomic weapons at each other, just way too much of a colossal headache.
>>
>>18657278
It's kind of interesting how India and even Pakistan got nuclear weapons but no one in the Middle East did, besides Israel.
>>
>>18657254
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_nuclear_weapons_programs
Asian nuclear programs are interesting
>>
>>18657681
I do. I'd gladly wait a couple years longer to buy a new cell phone if it meant that there were 90% fewer Chinamen.
>>
Because Japan lost the war.
>>
>>18658961
No, you won't.
>>
>>18658140
Israel stole it from the US.

We should bomb their nuclear facilities and slaughter any IDF thug who stands in the way of nuclear weapon inspections
>>
>>18659612
>Israel stole it from the US.
I thought it was the French who trained Israeli scientists on how to make nuclear weapons.
>>
>>18658961
China could survive a first strike and still have hundreds of millions left while most whites and browns and Japanese would be wiped out in a first strike.

China had the population, the number of launchers spread across its land and missiles to devastate most of the Japanese population and North America.

Meanwhile China has tens of millions of rural people in inland provinces and in the mountains.

Japan doesn't have enough launchers or missiles to destroy hundreds of cities across China in one strike

China can vaporise 99% of Japan's population in a first strike.
>>
>>18658965
What did China win then?
>>
File: images.jpg (6 KB, 196x196)
6 KB JPG
>>18660781
Japan wiped out their two native wolf species and river otter species to extinction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_wolf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hokkaido_wolf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_otter


Japanese literally skin animals alive before eating them.

https://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/viral-video-of-live-frog-sashimi-sparks-protest

https://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/2dljnz/eating_raw_bullfrog_sashimi_in_japan_bullfrog/
Japanese eat frogs alive

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ikizukuri

>Ikizukuri (生き作り), also known as ikezukuri (活け造り), (roughly translated as "prepared alive"[1]) is the preparing of sashimi (raw fish) from live seafood. In this Japanese culinary technique, the most popular sea animal used is fish, but octopus, shrimp, and lobster may also be used.[2]
>The practice is controversial owing to concerns about the animal's suffering, as it is still alive when served.

FROG EATEN ALIVE IN JAPAN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTuXoW7NcSg [Open] [Open]


Japanese also eat live baby fish in sōy sauce as well as live shrimp


Japanese torture dolphins and whales, and skin frogs alive for sashimi
Japanese also used to eat cat and dog before the Meiji restoration.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.