>NOOOO I'M SORRY I DIDN'T KNOW THE BAPTIST NEO-CATHOLIC ORTHODOX ADVENTIST PENTACOSTAL SALVATION CHURCH WAS FALSE AND THAT THE NEW BAPTIST NEO-CATHOLIC ORTHODOX ADVENTIST PENTACOSTAL SALVATION CHURCH WAS THE TRUE CHURCH, PLEASE LORD HAVE MERCY!
>>18660182IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN OBVIOUS HAD YOU THE PROPER CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS, CHUD. ENJOY HELL.
>>18660182it was your free will to reject that 1 pedofile on 4chan that said that church was correct without being able to prove it, because he had the holy spirit to help him know, the same one that didnt help you know. oh well. enjoy hell.
What if the true form of Christianity was already banned? Like Arianism, Nestorianism or the various Gnostic flavors. There were a lot of purges.
>>18660222There's pretty legit reasons to believe Marcionism was the true o.g. Christian church intended by God, that Satan conspired with wife-and-son-murdering Constantine the monstrous to suppress
>>18660222the "true" religion with an omnipotent omniscient god, cant lose
>>18660257This is very aligned with the origins of yahwism, which was as war-gods being carried into battle in little god-boxes. Of course, in reality the forces of yahweh lost all the time with the yahweh box which is why yahweh worshippers invented copes like "we were exiled in Egypt because God was angry"
>>18660222It is interesting how large Christian movements kept appearing throughout the ages with basically the same heretical beliefs, only to get suppressed/eradicated by the Christian establishment.>Valentinianism (early 2nd Century-4th Century)> Posited that a lower creator god, the Demiurge, made the flawed material universe, remaining ignorant of the higher spiritual realm until redeemed by Christ.>Marcionism (2nd Century)>rejected the Old Testament and claimed the God of creation was distinct from the supreme God of Jesus.>Priscillianism (4th-6th century)>derived from the Gnostic-Manichaean doctrines taught by Marcus. Priscillian was put to death by the emperor Magnus Maximus for the crime of magic.>Paulicianism (7th century)>even created a state but were destroyed by Byzantine Empire>Dualist cosmologies were professed by the Near Eastern Manichaean faith, as well as early Christian sects such as the Marcionists, and the sect's identification with dualism led the Paulicians to be traditionally labeled as Manichaeans and Marcionists by critics and scholars.>Catharism (12th–14th Centuries)>Believed the universe was divided between a good spiritual God of the New Testament and an evil physical creator (Rex Mundi) associated with the material world and the Old Testament.
>>18660222It's almost certain that the historical Jesus still believed in the exclusivity of the jews as the chosen people lol
Read Sir Robert Anderson
>>18660910Yes, because Judaism is Jewish-supremacist and one of the central themes of the Hebrew scriptures is that the jealous god Yahweh demands all the nations of the world exalt his Jews and worship him. If a historical Jesus existed then this is certainly what he also believed and expressed.
>>18660903>Claimed the God of creation was distinct from the supreme God of Jesus.i dont think this is necessarily true. Yahweh didnt start out as "God of Creation", that was El in the Canaanite pantheon. Yahweh of the old testament is a storm/warrior god.
>>18661089>Yahweh of the old testament is a storm/warrior godWhich is described as the world's creator with no equal...
>>18660197No arrows
getting into heaven is no right like atheists seem to believe. every human is whicked by default and deserve no less then hell, even the most righteous probably deserve hell too but god is mercifull and loving
>>18661107Why would he go out of his way to put the wicked into hell then?Hell isn't even a thing in the gospels originally. The idea was invented later. The righteous get resurrected and get to join the Kingdom of God.Depending on who you ask the wicked either:>Mark & Matthew: Just remain dead (no consciousness) >Luke: Get put into Hades until judgement day. After judgement they get the same fate as in Mark&Matthew>John: Just remain dead, but get briefly resurrected for judgement day. After failing the judgement they get extinguished again (no consciousness)
>>18661115>Why would he go out of his way to put the wicked into hell thenbecause they deserve punishment
>YOU DESERVE ETERNAL TORMENT BECAUSE I SAID SO!
What if every Christian is saved as long as they’ve been baptized and accept Christ? Denominations are a man made construct ultimately focused around exerting power over their parishioners and making money.
>>18661155Does it count if you get baptized by someone who is completely wrong about Jesus though?
>>18661189Even Catholics recognize a non-Catholic baptism as valid
>>18660222That’s impossible, because we have access to the true form of Christianity direct from God Himself in the holy scriptures.
>>18661258Based and Christ pilled
>>18661258Do you really think stuff like the Book of Revelation and the various Epistles were approved by God?
>>18661258>>18661356the true form has contradictions?>2 Samuel 24:1: “Again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he incited David against them, saying, ‘Go, number Israel and Judah.’”>1 Chronicles 21:1: “Then Satan stood against Israel and incited David to number Israel.”
>we're sorry, but you subscribed to the wrong theory of atonement. Pull the lever, Peter.
>>18661381Catholic cope is always amusing
>>18661484nope none of the christcuck denominations have an answer to that and many other contradictions
>>18660182>no christ in OP's whole spielVery telling.
>>18661492Do you have an answer?
>>18661671im not a christcuck
>>18661697What is your answer to life?
>>18660182>>18660205>>18660222You are braindead.
>>18661956>What is your answer to life?beyond evolution and the processes we can examine from within the system, how can we, as limited beings from within that system, ever truly know how the system "began" at all or if it was eternal? its not possible for anyone, but only religious people believe they know for certain, despite there being no proof for any such belief.
>>18661983>no argument
>>18661994>it thinks it deserves one
>>18662015i would much rather the usual satisfaction that a retard cant defend his beliefs and is seething at me because of it. concession accepted.
>>18662020>huffing fumes
>>18662050you lost lmao
