Why were the nazis ok with non-jewish war profiteers, bankers, and industrialists? Why is it that they didn't even try to abolish interest and usury after absorbing the Reichsbank into the party apparatus?
>>18664875Source?
>>18664878Privately owned banks continued to exist in Nazi Germany, and in fact several state owned banks were privatised, and these banks continued to charge high levels of interest ie usury. Industrialists and war profiteers were not only tolerated but rewarded if they supported the Nazi Party.
>>18664885Who were they giving loans to? As I recall the average citizen received interest free loans for starting families, among other benefits. And their economy and society prior to the war demonstrates how successful they were in doing so. Charging interest for Foreigners however is acceptable, they are not Germans, they do not deserve the same respect.State run banks that weren't Rothschild Banks would still have acted in service to the German People.
>>18664875They were pragmatic, you can't destroy the economy while fighting a war. Also they just didn't see anything inherently wrong with the system. All the bad things about it were the deleterious influence of the Jews and you could Aryanize them anyway. Plus grift&graft was just an integral part of the party apparatus.
>>18664901>As I recall the average citizen received interest free loans for starting families, among other benefits.They only became interest free after four children iirc.
>>18664901>Who were they giving loans to? As I recall the average citizen received interest free loans for starting families, among other benefits. And their economy and society prior to the war demonstrates how successful they were in doing so.I don't know every client they had, but I was not talking about the Reichsbank but the secondary, and often privately owned banks.>State run banks that weren't Rothschild Banks would still have acted in service to the German People.The ones I am talking about weren't state owned and they only served their own interests because thats what all private banks do Dresdner Bank was one of the largest banks in Europe during the 30s and the Nazis re-privatised it, after it had come under partial state ownership in the Weimar era
>Companies privatized by the Nazis included the four major commercial banks in Germany, which had all come under public ownership during the prior years: Commerz– und Privatbank, Deutsche Bank und Disconto-Gesellschaft, Golddiskontbank and Dresdner Bank.
>>18664875>LETS DESTROY LE BANKS>loses to PolandWhat did bolsheshits mean by this?
>>18665003The number one defender of bankers has spoken, everyone stop and listen to what he has to say.
>>18664875Hitler wasn't Jesus, so of course things could have been handled better. For instance, the way they defined the people to be saved wasn't based on the lightness which is of God and circumcises his people for their salvation in Christ.
>>18664875Hitler was a British spy working for Anglo-Saxon banksters. Hope this helps
>>18665240>British spy>who bombed Britain back to the stone agenot the sharpest crayon in the box
>>18665237>look nazis were so based they gave you money if you had kids!! literally most of the countries with low birthrates is doing that
>>18665246Debateable.Most of that benfit is extremely modest. Only Hungary actually made serious effort into giving lucrative rewards for having children, and it actually did increase birthrates. Not a lot, but still significant to get closer to the 2.0 line. No state has really followed Hungary on that.
>>18665245You think someone would do that? Sacrifice a few pawns to capture a king?
>>18664875>Why were the nazis ok with non-jewish war profiteers, bankers, and industrialists?>>18664885>Industrialists and war profiteers were not only tolerated but rewarded if they supported the Nazi Party.You just answered your own question.
>Nazi privatizationSo previously state owned enterprises were given to private individuals to manage, but who would still be beholden to the state. This is basic fascism 101. The state sees some kind of benefit from a business being run privately compared to being under direct state control. The state nourishes it but tries to never let it stray too far without the state, or outside the state, and never ever let it turn against the state. Outsourcing basically.
>>18664875why would they oppose the people who astroturfed their party into existence?
>>18665726>Most of that benfit is extremely modest.Most of them gets more cash for less children, most of modern states with low brithrates gives better benefits than nazis did AND nazis didn't succed in increasing the birthrate either, it went up a bit after the great depression ended but never reached pre WW1 no matter how hard they were pushing women having multiple children thing
>>18665950You make it sound like Germany's big business elite were the some sort of byzantine masterminds behind Nazism and not opportunistic rats jumping from a sinking ship to another.
>nazis privatized the economy>nazis were pawns of capitalistsWhat other historically illiterate midwit takes have you got on your bingo card? I've got:>nazis crushed the trade unions>nazis had no ideology>nazis put socialism in the name of their party to trick the workers
>>18664921They were fully forgiven after four children.
>>18664875>implying war profiteering is a bad thing
