people who use "what if i did that to you"arguments cant comphrend the existance of double standards.just because id like something onto others doesnt mean id like it be done on me,but the fact i can do it is enough for it to be done, morality is a sham.
people who use "that's not what that word means"arguments cant comphrend the existance of idiosyncracies.just because a word has a set of uses doesn't mean I'll conform.but the fact i can absquatulate it is enough for me to absquatulate, semantics are a sham.
people who use "how do you know that"arguments cant comphrend the existance of incompleteness.just because i cant prove something doesnt mean it isnt true,but the fact i say so is enough for it to be believed, epistemology is a sham.
>>18667423>"what if i did that to you" arguments I do get annoyed when people make those appeals in a way that ignored the reason for doing something. E.g. if a pedophile said "wow, you want to send me for prison for owning CP? What if someone sent you to prison just for enjoying your own hobbies, how would you like that?" It would ignore the reason why his hobby is illegal and mine aren't.
>>18667423God is a retard for believing he can call me immoral for making cosmic horror stories that describe some of the genuine evils of the world he created, especially while trying to say that "I'm God" when it's the most retarded lie imaginable and wouldn't even remotely be an excuse for him to abuse me in the first place if it were true, not only would it not be an excuse but the fact that he can abuse me is proof that his excuse is a lie but he's a demented retard too stupid to understand that. He abuses me my entire life then tries to call me immoral when I make cosmic horror stories that touch upon my experiences and the evil nature of this world. God is a completely retarded evil tranny
