>G-d isnt realBurning time
>>18686316I'm not even sure they burned atheists. The last person executed for Heresy (technically Blasphemy) in the British Isles was beheaded. Not that they ever got many Atheists because they weren't common in the first place and those almost never spoke out. To be an open Atheist before like 1900 (generously) you had to be fairly eccentric.
>>18686316ATHEISMVS INVICTVS
>>18686458Though it has to be said that before Darwin most examples of atheism are pretty far from the proto-typal modern atheist. Take foir example, the this New England Soldier:>Though no one in the colonies was put to death for denying Christ’s divinity or rejecting God, the law nonetheless looked upon such disavowals as potentially capital offenses. In one case in Massachusetts in 1654, a soldier, Benjamin Sawser, had drunkenly pronounced that “Jehova is the Devel” and that he “knew noe god but his sworde.” As the court deliberated whether Sawser’s egregious outburst constituted a capital crime, he made a jailbreak before a final punishment could be meted out.
>>18686316*Cracks spirit*
>>18686316lmao based
>>18686463Invictus means undefeated and atheism has been defeated many times
>>18686659>atheism has been defeated many timesnever happenedatheism won, you lost
>>18686743Lol. Atheism is like anarchy. It doesn't actually exist. It's simply a privation of theism, like anarchy is a privation of government.
>>18686802>privation ofNo such thing, there are always dualities
>>18686743Atheists lose virtually every debate but they just power through and tell themselves they actually won because they want to fap to gay porn
>>18686316Leviticus 20:14“‘If a man marries both a woman and her mother, it is wicked. Both he and they must be burned in the fire, so that no wickedness will be among you.
>Atheism: supported by evidence, willing to engage in reasoned debate, minimal faith-based leaps in logic, acknowledges what they know and do not know.>Religion: supported by books written millennia ago, demands you accept unfalsifiable claims before debating you, requires blind faith to be understood, claims to have all the answers, seeks to punish nonbelievers instead of convincing them, attracts small-minded, ignorant people with divine revenge fantasies.I don't know or care if the third world abrahamic slaves form a majority of this board or not. I stand resolute in my (lack of) belief.
>>18686805Whatever you want to call it. Demolition isn't a thing. Its the removal of a building. You can't have demolition without a building, and you can't have atheism without theism. Lol.Its like saying, >I want to live in a demolished building. Uh, the building doesn't exist. >yeah, but I want to live in demolition, so whatever you build, I will destroy, and that's what we should live in.But, there is nothing there if you just destroy everything. Destruction is not a thing you can live it. Its destruction.Lol.
>>18687091you would not have a notion of health in a world without illnesses, either.
>>18687975so why do atheists complain about the existence of illnesses? Without them there would be no notion of health.
>>18688043The average e-atheist doesn't really have juice in their Socratic tank to respond past the first few genuine answers one might give to them. In the interest of providing users of this Mongolian basket weaving forum with a satisfactory experience, I have been tasked with letting you know that you won, and the guy you were originally speaking with went back to cavort with his harem of autistic young cross-dressed men in a discord somewhere.
>>18686465>Seeking capital punishment for essentially bantWhy are religion tards such snowflakes?
