[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IJA squad.png (677 KB, 1999x1413)
677 KB PNG
Would The Rape of Nanking have been viewed so negatively if the IJA only had women as soldiers?
>>
>>18687961
No one cares about the Rape of Nanking besides the Chinese. Leftists are more critical of the atomic bombings as America is to blame for that.
>>
>>18687968
Would the Chinese have cared about The Rape of Nanking if all the IJA soldiers were violent and sexually aggressive women?
>>
>>18687961
I'm pretty sure most people would be just as upset about getting killed by women as they would be by men.
>>
>>18687979
But what about being raped by women?
>>
>>18687961
im pretty sure assistant, ammo and barrel bearer had their own rifles and weren't just watching the show
>>
>>18687961
>Nanking
Its nanjing
>>
>>18687961
yeah



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.