Evolution is a fact. I look down on people who don’t believe in evolution.
>OP thinks the party of Gender Mutilation, Abortion, lesbiansism/feminism and gays are continuing having the most offspring
>>18688566That being the case, the subject of evolution is for /sci/
>>18688566wrong
>>18688663New species are discovered all the time.
>>18688659>evolution is a political party
>>18688663liberals are retards who think the mind is literally evolving as Hegel and Marx describes. They think racist people in the 1800s actually have biologically different minds than current day. Not to mention that the Bible and Darwin both talk about racial hierarchy.
>>18688667>OP uses anti Christian image to imply Christians are being genetically outcompeted by non Christians>I reply who the most vocal non Christians are>(You) "Woah man!!! Why are you bringing up politics here!! This is SCIENCE tm"
>>18688566I too believe that blacks are retarded because of their genetic inferiority. It is simply evolution and nothing to get upset about.
>>18688685Your ancestors were black though?
>>18688688You are saying black skin is the oldest and most primitive feature of people? That's your gotcha?
>>18688659Quote five times I’ve said that >>18688661& humanities>>18688677>liberals>Marx>>18688685Yes, DNA evidence shows that a large portion of their DNA comes from archaic humans
>>18688703>You are saying black skin is the oldest and most primitive feature of people?Am I saying that?
>>18688680>i got triggered>>18688709But, you're not specifically speaking of human evolutuon, which i'd argue is still /sci/
>>18688719I’m speaking of evolution as an alternative to religious explanations for the creation of life, not the scientific basis for it
>>18688724But, you'd need the scientific basis to argue that point.Really, the subject of evolution vs. creationism runs downstream of inellectualism vs. anti-intellectualism.
>>18688728I agree
>the two demonic atheists make bad faith arguments>proceed to have a gay circlejerk for rest of thread
>>18688775Shut up you dark hell spawned demon
>>18688775Enjoy burning.
>>18688779You’re literally brown
>>18688779Hell-spawned should by hyphenated. They are dark hell-spawned demons.
>>18688667There are in fact liberal atheists who use evolution as a political cudgel. Ironically they're also the ones who insist that evolution stops at the neck.And as the other anon said, now that we live in a time where there's a significant biomasses of non-religious people in a population, we can see quite readily that evolution seems to select for organized religion in humans.
>>18688825Bad karma from a previous incarnation>>18688899Thanks for the clarification!
>>18688728This is the real problem. Plenty of people accept the accuracy of evolution and also believe in some sort of supernatural higher power while finding no contradiction or conflict between them.
>>18688945There ultimately isn’t a conflict. Either all of it is God or none of it is. Evolution is a red herring and is irrelevant to having faith because faith is faith-based, not fact-based.
>>18688945Only in the sense that you consider "supernatural" to be offensive. Some people believe, while conceding that their beliefs are unfalsifiable and thus irrelevant to the scientific model, that laws of physics and evolution are themselves an expression of creation. But of course that would still entail the act of their creation to be supernatural, and you find that offensive? Why? Because it entails there are aspects to metaphysics that the scientific model doesn't cover? Is that an affront to science to you? That sounds like dogmatic zeal.
>>18688566Evolution is just a theory.
I can’t trust the science anymore
>>18689004I wouldn’t call evolution a red herring, but I agree that faith is faith based and thus has nothing to do with science outside of the cases where scientists can also happen to be people of faith and so on. I just never saw a conflict between the two.>>18689006Uhhh, I think you’re projecting. There isn’t anything offensive to me about a belief in the supernatural. There just isn’t anything that can be measured scientifically that is also supernatural. You can add a layer of supernatural involvement if you want because the supernatural cannot be disproven. Which is fine because the two just aren’t connected outside of personal preference and perception.
>>18688566Humans didn't come from monkeys, ya' mark.
>>18689215>Uhhh, I think you’re projecting.No, there are people who genuinely take offense if you say you believe that the scientific model doesn't cover all of reality; that there are other planes of existence.
>>18689122The theory of evolution has nothing to do with postmodernism >>18689219We came from ape like creatures who came from rodent like creatures who came from the sea.Way cooler than having a magic sky man make us
Evolution was invented by a freemason.
>>18689252Masonry is a social club for boomers
>>18689228Weird. I can’t imagine why. A number of very well respected scientists have also been religious. They just tend to leave the supernatural in church and the science in the lab. I guess it is pretty annoying when someone insists science proves the supernatural exists, though that’s more akin to refusing to stop misusing a word.
>>18689219Humans did come from monkeys. All life came from something. Birds came from dinosaurs. Cats, dogs, and wolves came from sabre toothed tigers. Bugs came from large amphibious scorpions.
>>18689608Consciousness is a very emotional point of contention for many people. The vitriol physicalists show towards people who believe that consciousness is not physical is pretty alarming to witness.
>>18688566Evolution is true, but genetics isn't. The nucleus is the brain of the cell.
Great thread chud!
>Evolution is a fact. I look down on people who don’t believe in evolution.
>>18689230>The theory of evolution has nothing to do with postmodernismit’s literally the source of it, chuddy. Postmodernism logically flows from there being no God and people being monkeys.
>>18689925One joke>>18689928It’s literally not. Postmodernism is anti science.
>>18689122>I can't trust the science because emoji
>>18688688our ancestors were chimpanzees, so humans can't be more intelligent than apes
>>18690100Our ancestors were not chimpanzees. Chimpanzees and humans share a common ancestor that would go on to become humans and chimpanzees. And of course humans can’t be smarter than an ape seeing as they are apes. How could a group be smarter than itself?
>>18688566Wallace’s Views are ‘Interesting’
>>18689230>>18689987If biologists want to shred their credibility for the sexual gratification of transvestites, I’m not going to lend much credence to their creation myth.
>>18690119Men can never become women, but that doesn’t change the fact that evolution happened.
>>18690140>evolution is a factYou aren’t very smart, so you should find someone more credible to do your thinking for you.
>>18690217You can observe evolution happening within your own lifetime.
>>18690221>Therefore God doesn't exist o algo
>>18689646Only smart person itt
>>18690366That wasn't my argument. Just had to let you know you're retarded
>>18690380I don't care what you think, nigger.
>>18689967>Postmodernism is anti science.That's a good thing, thoughbeit. Scientists still haven't solved the problem of causality after 2,000 years, yet they expect everyone else to believe in their nonsense through dogmatic scientism cults.
>>18690382Then keep replying to show off how little you care
