The Big Bang is the greatest evidence for theism ever discovered by science, why do people overlook this?
>spacetime expands therefore magic Jew in the sky and 3=1
>>18688762More like> physics can trace a finite projection backward toward its earliest state which even there still never supplies its own independent sourcehood
>>18688747>make a (weak) argument for Deism>therefore TheismErry tiem
>>18688798How is it an argument for deism? The origin never closes
>>18688777
>>18688876Physics can trace cosmic evolution backward toward an extremely early hot, dense state, while the physical account does not itself establish an independently self-grounding source of that state.
>>18688762You have been so mindfucked by Judaism that as soon as you hear theism you think about it.Op never once mentioned Christianity, not once>>18688798this, but he didn't even make an argument as well also it should be more like (((weak)))
There is not a single religion that aligns with modern science. Theists should study evolutionary psychology before even talking about the big bang.
>>18688914Why isn’t religion compatible with science? Sorry but that’s historically illiterate. The scientific conviction that one set of universal mathematical laws governs both heaven and Earth developed overwhelmingly within Jewish-Christian Europe.
>>18688938Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses are all fictional characters. Jesus' miracles are fantasies dreamed up by the deranged. Ergo, your religion is false.
>>18688951That’s just atheism smuggled in under the name of scholarship. Historical criticism cannot conclude that God does not reveal Himself through Israel.
>>18688981History happens to confirm atheism, that's just a fact.
>>18688884>Physics can trace cosmic evolution backward toward an extremely early hot, dense stateThat state isn't the "earliest state" as you claimed.>the physical account does not itself establish an independently self-grounding source of that state.Does it need such a source?>>18688908The only "people" who pretend atheists are stupid enough to not know a christcuck when they see one are christcucks.
>>18688988There is no way for history to “confirm atheism”. None at all. Not when history is God’s own act. Not when everything comes from an open singularity. It’s just a matter of how you read things I guess.
>>18689009> Does it need such a source?Are causes real? Where else would it be borrowing actuality from?
>>18689010Open singularity? What are you even talking about? Take your meds.
>>18689009You are genuinely turning mad from the Jews; get fucking grip not everyone who says something you don’t like is a Christian
>>18689018Go to college dude
>>18689027I have a PhD. There's nothing called an "open singularity". You should stop getting your "science" from YouTube and take your meds.
>>18689037bodied that freak
>>18689037“Open singularity” is just freestyle metaphysics> “Singularity” gestures toward one irreducible Source> “Open” denies that this Source closes into a self-contained object with its own boundarySo “open singularity” intuitively just means to say: everything originates here, but there is no sealed “here” you can isolate.
>>18689052>freestyle metaphysicsSo, nothing to do with reality. Got it.
>>18689057philistine energy
you reach all the way to the big bang but rubber band past the universe to a book. its fucking ridiculous.
>>18688938>developed overwhelmingly within Jewish-Christian Europe.Because you burned people to death for coming out as an atheist or even a skeptic you fucking retard. Even Descartes was afraid to submit his work
>>18688777>finite
>>18689158Finite trace insofar as physics can look back about 13.8 billion years
