[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Would Gnostics fare better under Islamic Sharia paying jizyah tax vs Jewish Sanhedrin with Noahide laws?
>>
>>18690813
Mandaeans aren’t considered people of the book unless they’re considered the same group as the Sabeans mentioned in the Quran.
>>
>>18690837
So how are zoroastrians considered so? What does 'people of the book' even mean?
>>
>>18690898
There's one passage in the Quran which specifically names Christians, Jews, and "Sabeans" as people who received revelations from Allah previously. These people shouldn't be killed like pagans, but should instead be subservient to Muslims and pay the jizya and some of these people may enter paradise one day too.

>Zoroastrians

I'm not sure exactly how Zoroastrians are viewed by the current regime in Iran, but from what I understand a lot of Persians hold them as a symbol of national pride from back when Persia was the seat of a global religion.
>>
>>18690929
>'m not sure exactly how Zoroastrians are viewed
They're considered people of the book, historically and according to the islamic corpus



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.