[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_0009.jpg (7 KB, 250x238)
7 KB JPG
>God exists!
>God exists because there has to be a first cause!
>Theres either a contingent being or necessary being!
>So the necessary being has to be god!
>…well YOU JUST HAVE TO TRUST ME THAT THE NECESSARY BEING IS GOD OKAY??

listen im a theist but cosmological arguments are genuinely the most DOGSHIT way to prove God and you get stuff like IBN SINAS IRREFUTABLE PROOF OF GOD!! the Kalam cosmological argument!! And then it turns out its just a big fat nothing burger presupposition
>>
>>18691512
That’s not the argument, the argument is that the necessary being and God are identical
>>
>>18691515
Every First Cause argument tries to sneak in the argument that necessary being = God, not a single one of them can prove this, any Low Tier Atheist could catch this non sequitur and dismantle. Just because they are identical (which also is presupposed by the way) it does not mean that it is understood as God.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.