[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why was Dean Andrews involved in the JFK fallout and why did he keep switching his story in regards to Clay Shaw/Clay Bertrand? The movie doesn't make it very clear.
>>
>>18691906
>The movie doesn't make it very clear.
>Kevin Costner almost immediately states how Andrews got a call from Bertrand to represent Oswald the day after the assassination
Also GOD they don't make movies like they used to
>>
>>18692432
Yeah but that doesn't mean Dean Andrews was involved.
>>
>>18692481
So? It was another point for both the movie and in the irl case to show Bertrands connection to Oswald
>>
>>18692501
Did Oswald ever confirm or deny his connection with Andrews?
>>
>>18692635
*meant Bertrand/Shaw, not Oswald
>>
>>18691906
Weren't you listening daddy-o... it's New Orleans. No one knows what side they're on until they're asked. And even then they might be lying



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.