Why is the anti-White jew academia hell bent on claiming that the hyksos were semetic?This is in spite of the hyksos having a fairly indo European ruling class.They engage in ceremonial horse burial, introduced horses and chariots to Egypt.Ceremonial horse burial is tell tale feature of Indo European people.
>>18704741because the position they push is that shit-skins were everything and whites belong nowhere
Curious. The 5-billion-IQ supergenius known as /pol/ told me the hyksos were Jews.
>>18704840Nobody on /pol/ claims that.Only jews who have no history or civilization of their own claim that.They look through the pages of history and desperately attempt to associate themselves with anyone relevant.The ultimate WeWuzzers.
>>18704741Because the Hyksos worshipped Baal
>>18704848>the Hyksos worshipped Baalbased
>>18704848>Because the Hyksos worshipped BaalNo proofs for this, rabbi.
>>18704851Baal is a based Aryan god who shits down the throats of Yahweh, Jesus, Muhammad, and Vishnu, rabbi
>>18704845https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/220953679/#220980430
>>18704858Probably a jew.There are plenty of them over there.
>>18704840>hyksos were Jews
>>18704867Yep, because jews are totally associated with horse and chariot riding gigachads.Jews hate themselves so much that they are trying to claim Aryan heritage.
>>18704862>There are plenty of them on /pol/Retard.
>>18704878Are you denying the cheer amount of jew shills on /pol/?
>>18704880I am denying things you made up in your ESL ass head, yes.
Hyksos were too late for chariots and horse burials by themselves to count as evidence of Indo-European origin. If they had appeared hundreds of years earlier they would have to be Sintashta-derived. But when the Hyksos show up around 1650 BC, chariot and horse ritual culture had already diffused all over Eurasia, far beyond the Indo-Europeans, you can find chariot burials and chariot ritual as far east as Shang China, who were definitely not Indo-European. I think you probably saw that the Mittani can be identified as Indo-Aryan from their chariot expertise and horse training manuals and tried to extend it to the Hyksos, but there's a wealth of other evidence for the Mittani that doesn't exist for the Hyksos.First of all Mittani vocabulary was Indo-Aryan, most famously the numerals used in the Mittani horse-training manual. Look:1 - Mittani aika - Vedic eka-tera3 - Mittani tera - Vedic tri5 - Mittani panza - Vedic panca7 - Mittani satta - Vedic sapta9 - Mittani nava - Vedic navaThen their rulers and elites had IE names, their gods were the same as the Vedic ones; Mitra-Varuna, Indra, and Nasatyas; forming the IE tripartition. And finally there's also a clear geographic and archaeological trail, correlated with haplogroup R1a-M417, from Sintashta into West Asia that matches the Mittani. Nothing comparable exists for the Hyksos. If you want to come up with a bunch of fabricated cope about how the Hyksos had IE names and gods and vocabulary and genes, go ahead, but you're wasting your time.
>>18704903>far beyond the Indo-EuropeansFor example?>Shang clearly introduced by "barbarians from the west".
>>18704903You are conveniently leaving out several things. There is very compelling archaeological and linguistic work showing the possible influence that Tocharian and Indo-Iranian speakers had on China, particularly in metallurgy and chariotry. Regardless of who the Hyksos were, using Chinese dynasties as an example of how chariots and ritual culture involving war chariots and horses spread throughout Eurasia without any direct Indo-European influence is not accurate in this case. I also think you are significantly underestimating the IE presence in China. nomads were present in western China (Xinjiang and Gansu) during the second millennium BC . The trade connections and influence of these nomads on Chinese society is clearly visible in the Shang and Zhou periods, where chariots, horse burials, and steppe-style weaponry appear. The Shimao site is dated to around 2000 BC, and the presence of wheat, barley, sheep, and bronze certainly indicates they were trading with steppe peoples.There are also some elements of religion and founding stories of these periods which have striking similarities to Indo-European themes. Their presence in what is now western China dates back to at least 1800 BC. We have samples with an Andronovo profile from Xinjiang and Aketala. It's interesting to read Chinese accounts describing the appearance and lifestyle of the "barbarian" peoples of the steppes.
>>18704882> NAWW PLEASE STOP RECOGNIZING PATTERNS.
>>18704903>Hyksos were too late for chariots and horse burials by themselves to count as evidence of Indo-European origin. If they had appeared hundreds of years earlier they would have to be Sintashta-derived.An exact date of their arrival is almost impossible to estimate.Your entire premise is invalid.> But when the Hyksos show up around 1650 BC, chariot and horse ritual culture had already diffused all over EurasiaIt really wasn't, as evident by how impressed the Egyptians were with them and how they instantly adopted them, if the chariots were already omnipresent throughout the region, the Egyptians would have had contact with them already and likely adopted them.
>>18704903>I think you probably saw that the Mittani can be identified as Indo-Aryan from their chariot expertise and horse training manuals and tried to extend it to the Hyksos, but there's a wealth of other evidence for the Mittani that doesn't exist for the Hyksos.No, the view that the Hyksos were IE was the academic view prior to you jews taking over academia after WWII.> If you want to come up with a bunch of fabricated cope about how the Hyksos had IE names and gods and vocabulary and genesYou are the one coping, avi. My view is the default position pre jew take over of academia and their deep anti White bias.
>>18704903They had no response to this
