[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Shouldn't it be the other way around or were the like "Hah, I conquered you, now fuck my daughter!"
>>
>>18719653
Modern Turks are descendants of the Turkic invaders and the conquered West Eurasians, which is why they have a percentage of East Eurasian Y-DNA.

Haplgroups like O3 are found in Anatolian Turks, Azeris, Persians, Saudi Arabs, Iraqi Arabs, Turkmen, Crimean Tatars.

Anatolia had zero % O3 before the Turkic invasion

Now it's Turkic speaking and had O3 and autosomal East Eurasian added to the gene pool

Meanwhile Siberian Turks like Sakha have no West Eurasian Y-DNA in their original homeland.
>>
>>18719832
Yakuts are the product of a mongol era founder effect, before their y dna clades would be more diverse
>>
>>18719653
Steppe and zagros admixture was present in central asia and south siberia since the bronze age, even among the xiongnu
>>
>>18719832
Then that means that it would be completely justified to deport all turks back to central asia
>>
>>18719653
Modern turks are anatolian greeks converted to islam. Simple as.
>>
>>18719653
>If turks conquered west eurasians how come most modern turks have west eurasian paternal ancestry?
Most Turks in the middle east are just locals who assimilated into Turkish culture&religion. The later Nomadic steppe peoples do this fairly often where they reverse assimilate the proles rather than getting assimilated by them. It also happened in Hungary, for example.
>Shouldn't it be the other way around
There are more forms of spreading a culture than just exterminating the men and raping the women.
>or were the like "Hah, I conquered you, now fuck my daughter!"
No. Though maybe that happened sometimes with local elites and the like. Ultimately, assimilating a group of people does mean also eliminating the barrier that enables them to reproduce together. There are more forms of conquest than just establishing a distinct ruling elite over the sedentary masses.
>>
>>18719832
Nah nigga R1 is the most common Y haplogroup in turkey (27%) followed by middle eastern J2a, the way I see it the so called "Turkic" conquerors were just a bunch of assimilated west eurasian and middle easterners, no wonder Ottoman royalty spoke Persian, an indo european language, instead of a turkic language
>>
>>18719653
If you exclude the Anglo-Saxon-Jutes, the Yamnaya proper, Corded Ware proper, the Bell Beakers, and the Slavs, all other invading warrior-farmer groups were lowlife faggots who didn't instigate mass-paternity replacement onto their prey. The Turkshits were notorious for homosexuality and their aversion to breeding with women. Merely 15% of Anatolian Turks have Turkshit Y-DNA, and the rest is cuck-HQ.
>>
>>18721125
Whoops, I corrected the image.
>>
>>18719653
They were a ruling minority and eventually the native people that turkified and muslimized themselves to fit in in their hegemony genetically assimilated them generation after generation. Osman himself AFIAK had the traditional anatolian farmer haplogroup, meaning his ancestors were turkified natives
>>
>>18721050
Yea people often forgot that in 1070 the Seljuks Turks were already mostly settled in the iranian area for like 200 years. They were already heavily mixed with Middle East genetics by that point
>>
>>18720074
Bc of the origonal proto indo europeans. They expanded everywhere and nixed with the locals. There's a strong theory and some circumstantial evidense that they migrated into turkish lands. Showed them how to ride horses and possible their metal working skills. Mixed with them very early on. Fun fact, shang china had loan words from the indo europeans. There's also a grave of a shang china princess where some of the bodies of sacrificial victoms carried indo european dna. Mayhe they attacked China and lost and then had constant contact with each other.
>>
>>18721050
You don't understand what I'm saying.

The Turkic invasions of former Indo-European areas resulted in a net gain of East Eurasian Y-DNA in those areas.

So Anatolia was 100% Indo-europeean Y-DNA and now it's only 85% Indo-European Y-DNA

While Siberian Yakuts in their original homeland are still 100% East Eurasian Y-DNA.

So it's a net addition of East Eurasian to former Indo-European lands, it's just cope to deny it.
>>
>>18720989
Agreed. Exterminating the males and raping the females did happen here and there. The most fanous being the proto indo european invasion of europe where steppe males eradicated the neolithic males and kept the women. That being said, most conquests was a group taking over another group through violence and then enforcing their language and culture on the serfs. Over time they get assimulated bc there are alot more serfs than nobles.
>>
File: CirzĂ®.jpg (304 KB, 1280x1778)
304 KB JPG
>>18719653
>If Europeans with their Anatolian IE norse Deq tattoos conquered North Africa why are Nafris E1b1b
Turk kangz are indigenous and no Indian-Euro/Semitic fags cope can make them foreigners.
>>
>>18721278
Anatolian y dna wasn't mostly indo european, it was anf and zagros, turks spread stuff like r1a to turkey
>>
>>18721368
Yakuts are products of mongol era founder effects
>>
>>18720989
Magyars did invade a depopulated land but they were killed off later and replaced by later immigrants, hence hungarians having small magyar dna, and the magyars not being nearly as east eurasian as the huns in the first place.
>>
>>18721363
They have a lot of European y DNA depending on region
>>
File: We wuz.jpg (67 KB, 533x400)
67 KB JPG
>>18721397
You're a pseudo who doesn't believe in Science, all Academic dna papers say Nafris wuz not replaced by niggers, sandniggers or snowniggers.
>>
>>18719653
majority of conquest past the introduction of slavery/serfdom wasn't about "spreading genes" or whatever nonsense people believe in it was about installing yourself as the landlord to reap where you had never sown. therefore killing the locals was fucking retarded because then you'd have to be some shitty farmer instead of a noble.
>>
>>18721171
And Turks in general were mercenaries for the Arabs and were in places like Egypt well before Manzikert. They were also serving in Sasanian Persian armies.
>>
File: Promise Land.jpg (66 KB, 686x386)
66 KB JPG
>>18721463
Kek. That's the Indian-Euro/Semitic fag cope to claim North Africa/Egypt try telling Jews you wuz not cleansed off (your) promise land it wuz only repurposed as rental to (you).
>>
>>18721497
holy fuck anon please touch grass and stop obsessing over jews not everything is about them
>>
>>18719653
because they were willing to integrate people they subjugated
>>
>>18721475
Exactly, Turkic military service in the Middle East predates Manzikert by centuries, especially under Persian and Islamic states.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.