were are the missing links?
>>18721564https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICv6GLwt1gM
>>18721564Raped and gaped by homo sapiens chads, but seriously speaking, in Brazil
Mostly in museums
>>18721564lol
It's "where" you drooling tard. What are you trying to say exactly?The picture you posted is some weird evangelical young earth anti-evolution schizo shit. The other hominids died out but we still have literally thousands of skeletons and other artefacts and tools and graves belonging to other hominid species.We literally have identifiable traces of neanderthal DNA in our bodies from historical interspecies mixing.If you mean apes then our last common ancestor with chimps and bonobos was about 8 - 9 million years ago.Various fossil species such as Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Orrorin tugenensis, and Ardipithecus ramidus may well be that link between man and ape but we haven't done the science yet to prove it.We've only been looking for this stuff for a few years.Why the fuck are Yanktarded megachurch prosperity gospel fundamentalist freaks like this on the internet? What the fuck is going on in America to produce such specimens?
>>18722960Stop responding to bait.
>>18721564>were are the missing links?they are missing, duh.
What's even the point of making such threads in an era of ancient DNA? Are you people stupid? Retarded maybe?
bump
>>18721564>Posting Jack Chick comics
>>18721564If they weren't missing they wouldn't be called that.
In israel, Africa, India, Central/South America, Australia
>>18723202>I can’t believe in God because I don’t think there’s any evidence, nevermind the kind of evidence I demand is impossible>also I believe in evolution even though there’s no evidence because the evidence is impossible
>>18721564Some are in the ground, some are in labs or museum repositories.
>>18724572Reason for calling these monkey skulls “missing links”?
>>18724575They're the links that were missing and later found.
>>18724578I think they’re just monkeys. Why do you think they’re “missing links”?
>>18724581Well the "missing link" problem was basically the idea that man and monke are too different and there are no intermediate forms in the fossil record, therefore man can't come from monke. These things are anatomically intermediate forms.
>>18724587No, they’re just monkeys.
>>18724591You can say that but it doesn't change the fact that they're anatomically intermediate.
>>18724596How so? It’s just monkeys and then it’s just people. You might as well declare a fish is “anatomically intermediate” compared to bacteria
>>18721564In the same place your spelling skills are
>>18724599An australopithecus has more human-like traits than monke, habilis has more of them than australopithecus, ergaster has more than habilis, erectus more than ergaster, heidelbergensis more than erectus. That's what makes them intermediate.The claim of the "missing link" was that such intermediates do not exist.
>>18721564africa dumb ass
>>18721564>>18722960>>18724570>>18724575>>18724581>>18724591>>18724599Incredibly dated and boring shit post that hinges on being ignorant and retarded to something that's become pedestrian household knowledge at this point. You can see a full complete transitional fossil line of human evolution in most natural history museums.You could play this game in the 90's, maybe 00's, but it's "current year": we have modern DNA sequencing and quite literally possess thousands and thousands of caveman and apeman skeletons. It's over. It's been over for decades. This is a cliche. This would be Simpsons episode from 2005, but instead it's your life. This entire fucking song and dance has become, if anything, indicative of the decline of cultural relevancy of Christianity.
>>18721564Missing link between what? Human and chimp? That was probably Sahelanthropus, which could have been the latest common ancestor of humans and chimps. Also, it was just an ape, not an in-between point of humans and apes. Or you want something that is halfway between an ape and a human? That's really subjective, since humans are a type of ape too, but what you are probably looking for is either Ardipithecus or Homo habilis (first known tool user which is debated if it should be considered a member of the Homo or Australopithecus genus).
>>18724608A fish has more human-like traits than bacteria.
>>18724678Yes, and?The "missing link" claim was that there is no anatomical intermediate between man and monke. That claim is false.
>>18724742So you admit you consider a literal fish to be an “intermediate form”. Which means that as long as there are more than 2 creatures you will interpret the evidence as supporting evolution no matter what. Circular reasoning
>>18724745>Which means that as long as there are more than 2 creatures you will interpret the evidence as supporting evolution no matter what.Obviously not. I never said "intermediate forms between monke and human, therefore evolution". I merely say that when creations made the argument "no intermediate forms between monke and human, therefore evolution" (i.e. the missing link argument), they were wrong because there are intermediate forms between monke and human.
>>18724754>creations made the argument "no intermediate forms between monke and human, therefore evolution"*therefore no evolution
>>18724754But there are no intermediate forms. Those are just monkeys, same as the monkeys we already knew about.
>>18724759You can call them monkeys if you want, but they are anatomically intermediate.
I'm willing to concede modern mutt humans might be related to monkeys, but the idea that the original progenitors of humanity descend from African hominids is basically propaganda.
The guys making racebait and posting porn all day on 4chan.
