Late into the war, what would the priority of the Nazi high command have been? Did they universally want a surrender from the western Allies to then focus their manpower on the Soviets?
>>18723759>Did they universally want a surrender from the western Allies to then focus their manpower on the Soviets?Not universally, the guy with a single testicle in charge wanted to keep fighting until the end, hoping Germany emerges out of a rump state with literal Child soldiers being sent out in a desperate bid to finally rid the world of Krauts, but unfortunately it didn't work.
>>18723759The july plotters envisaged germany not only keeping everything it had taken up until the outbreak of ww2, Poland, and alsace-lorraine but also recovering control over at least some of its pre-ww1 colonies in africa. Now scale that up to Hitler's level of delusion.
>>18723759It was to prolong the Prophet's life for few more months and then to try to fulfill his prophecy that Germany will cease to exist if he loses.
>>18723759gaylter was permanently buckbroken by the 1918 armistice so any surrender was out of question, his plan in late 1944 was something like>take Antwerp>weak liberals get scared of both mighty hitler and the realisation that if germany loses, red army will be at the french border and sue for peace>germany then defeats ussrby the 1945, it was somehow similar >defend rhine>red army suffers huge casualties when trying to capture berlin and FINALLY collapses >win the war
>>18723759Make time until they could escape to argentina.
How were they so cocky and sure Barbarossa would be a success, reading Halder's diary they didn't really underestimate the enemy as some weird subhuman brutes, they took the highest professional organization possible.Should have a backup plan.
>>18724935Nazis too small for the job, schicklegruber to dumb to understand.
>>18723759krauts always get raped and slaughtered by Anglo-Slavic GODS
