This is a reconstruction of a random first century Jew. I hate when people say this is Jesus. It is not Jesus, it is a random first century Jew, and an ugly one too. There is no evidence Jesus looked like this. Not all first century Jews look the same. There is literally no reliable description of what Jesus looked like other than the Gospel which implies He looked similar enough to the Disciples that Judas had to point Him out rather than describe Him lol.
>>18724714>Jesus was contaminated by the dark taint of hell-spawned demonsheretical jewish nonsense
Amen brother. And because we don’t know what He looked like no man can depict Him in an image without presumption and insult.
>>18724720Exactly lol.
>>18724714>and an ugly one too"Like one from whom people hide their faces he was despised, and we held him in low esteem." - Isaiah 53:3
>>18724718>>18724714>>18724720>>18724722>The dark taint of hell-spawned demonsI agree, whites are disgusting demons. Jesus couldn't have been white and people making art of him being white are going to hell. whites truly are hell-spawned
>>18724727This is exactly the kind of thing a White woman says while being White.Lol.
>>18724718>>18724727take your meds
>>18724727your judgement is written as the darkness of your flesh, the mark of the beast, and all you dark hell-spawned demons belong in hell, or better yet dead so that hell itself is destroyed.
>>18724714Jesus was described as being ugly.Isaiah 53:2>He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him
>>18724714Isaiah 53 says the Messiah was ugly.>He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him. He was despised and rejected by mankind, a man of suffering, and familiar with pain.
>>18724799>>18724803That fits the Christian understanding of Christ’s humility and Incarnation: the Messiah comes not with the visible splendor people might expect of a king, but in ordinary human form.
>>18724799>>18724803>Isaiah 53:2This line just means that the Messiah is someone who comes from an average background that can relate to the average joe. It doesn't mean he's hideous looking despite the standards of foids.>rejected by Mankindeveryone has a nonconformity angle to them.
>>18724838>nothing in his appearance that we should desire himImplies the historical Jesus was ugly as fuck
>>18724841do you get the difference between an attractive model causing desireability and the average joe's apperance?
>>18724851Even the average Joe typically has *something* about his appearance that's desirable. Jesus must've been noticeably chopped
>>18724714If this is what your average 1st century Jew looked like and Jesus was described as having an average appearance, then we can assume he looked something like this.>>18724718>>18724784Begone.
>>18725274>Jesus was contaminated by the dark taint of hell-spawned demonsnot according to the way they were depicted at the timewhat you are doing is like saying that the american founding fathers were black because you found black bones in america dated to around the same time period. obviously stupid nonsense
>>18725501You realize those mosaics are all depicting brown people, right?
>>18725501Source on those drawings.
>>18725516>those mosaics are all depicting brown peoplepretending not to see the light will not save you from hell
>>18725529If you wouldn't worship a black Jesus, you were already Hellbound
>>18725550Das rite
>>18725550>>18725572>Christianity is worship>Christianity is when you worship dark hell-spawned demons
