>A: We know this happened because Herodotus said it.>B: How do we know Herodotus said it?>A: Because of a scroll credited to him written 1,500 years after he died.>B: How do we know he wrote that scroll?>A: Because one page of 500 mostly matches a fragment we found written 700 years after he died. >B: How do we know he wrote the fragment written 700 years after he died then? And even assuming that were true what about the other 499 pages?>A: Shut the fuck up you're LITERALLY the same as Flat Earther or climate change denier.Do historycucks really? Why are they so insecure about admitting that we really don't know much about certain historical events beyond the broadest points of what can be verified by archaeology?
>>18731780All of this also just takes it as a given that if Herodotus said something it was true btw, which is also ridiculous.
>>18731781>All of this also just takes it as a given that if Herodotus said something it was true btw,He's called "the father of lies", anon.
Why do you care about ancient Rome? The last 6 Roman emperors were fags.
