Thoughts on out of place artifacts?
>>18732118There is no such thing as an "out of place artifact". If an artifact is legitimate, it is very much not out of place, rather our understanding of the ancient culture it was found in is what is out of place. "Out of Place Artifact" is just a rhetorical device used by pseudo-archeologists to peddle grifts
>>18732118From the lost trilobite civilization.
>>18732118That is probably a fossilized tree
>>18732118>300 million yearNope. Next?
>>18732118There is this book Forbidden archeology that list plenty of them. Quite interesting thing. Anyway I think that author who claim that they are hundred thousands or million of years is wrong. It's not that these artifacts are super ancient, it's just that processes that make them as they are now can happen quite fast. This open another can of worms tho.
>>18732118And these highly experienced miners carefully dug out this 300,000,000 year old wheel and brought it to the surface for conservation, analysis and display. Gwen Stefani, Gwen Stefani.
>>18732353>Forbidden archaeologyWoaow that sounds completely legit
kino as a plot deviceschizo as real history tho
why do normalfagoids hate archaeology so much? why do they insist on belittling it and inserting their schizo shit into it?
>>18732118That’s clearly part of Noah’s ark. Any time you find something like that, the best explanation is Noah’s ark.>>18732122Oh! Like how the Faces of Mars are remnants of Noah’s Ark! Amazing!
>>18733265>normalfagoids >schizo shitYappers just yapping to yap at this point.
