It’s amazing that Abrahamists seem generally incapable of seeing, or unwilling to see, that the creature is a dependent expression of God acting creature-wise. What’s the point in believing in God if you aren’t even going to allow yourself to see the obvious?The irony is that Abrahamic theology already insists the creature exists entirely through God. But many theologians resist extending that to dependence of action itself. It’s like watching a play but refusing to acknowledge the divine playwright.
>>18733064Calvinists don't and they have the most Biblically accurate view on salvation/damnation as a result.Ephesians 2:8-9>"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast."
>>18733103Nope, Calvinism still preserves distinct secondary agency. That’s not the same as collapse into one singular Act.
