More than half of the worlds Christian population are African and Latinx. Theological implications of this?
>>18733715>Theological implications of this?The heretical misclassification of dark hell-spawned demons as children of God.
>>18733715+1 to Calvinism.
>>18733728>why no black people were before 100 years ago
>>18733733>these are blacks
christianity is just going to get slumdogmaxxed like most other aspects of western society. there'll be wards against the 'evil eye' and 'djinns' added to the vatican, the anglican church will bring back witch trials, coca cola will become an acceptable substitute for wine in the eucharist through much of latinx america etc
>>18733735If you look like that, I have bad news for you, you are black.
>>18733737Those are contaminated by the dark taint of hell-spawned demons, and they should self castrate the way Jesus said everyone like them ought to.
>>18733715Hmmm nice! But remember that soon your white atheist religion will turn brown. Religious atheism is growing in Dravidian land and Latin America will soon be another bastion of atheism :) what will you guys say then? Larpganism? But Hindus are "pagans," so that's brown too. Besides, "African Christianity" is another type of religion with Christian clothing. you know what the coolest part is? Charismatic Protestant Christianity is extremely well-suited to the favelas of South America and is growing rapidly. A type of robust, solemn, and inwardly serious Catholicism is totally out of place and has often only survived by marrying the myths and superstitions of the locals, the best part is that many people who become atheists in these favela countries come from charismatic Protestant homes, just like in the US or Northern Europe. Soon Latinos and people like Chud Anon will be your brothers and sisters in faith. Based
>>18733775>heh you are smug now but uh we are about to lose the groups that still believe us, take that
>>18733775Exactly. Soon Indians will be the biggest atheists of all. The "Undeclared Religion" category (from the 2011 Census) cites 2.9 million people (0.24% of the population). This number grew very fucking quickly, as in 2001 it was only 700,000 (0.06%), it seems that 3% of Indians declared themselves convinced atheists. In absolute numbers, this represented about 36.3 million fuckinh people. The WIN-Gallup 2012 Index says that 13% of Indians considered themselves non-religious. This was equivalent to approximately 157.3 million people. A study by Cambridge University Press says that between 2% and 6% identified as atheist or irreligious. This meant something between 24 million and 72 million people. (sigh and laugh) The best part of this thread is that India's non-religious population surpasses the population of several of Western Europe's most populous countries. So, I have a question for the OP: Theological implications of this?
Come home, white man.
>>18733793OP didn't respond, so I'll answer for him. Assuming that Europe and other Western white countries are the pinnacle of atheism, Ironically there are more non-religious and atheistic people in India than inhabitants in several of the most populous countries in Western Europe if we're going to play around with pure numerology. As I showed there, about 13% of the Indian population identifies as non-religious and another 3% declare themselves as convinced atheists. Translating these numbers to the massive population of the Dasyus which exceeds 1.4 billion people, the absolute numbers become sad for the OP because the 3% of convinced atheists represent more than 40 million people, a number of individuals greater than the entire population of European countries like Poland, Portugal, or Belgium. Expanding to the 13% of non-religious Indians, we are talking about more than 180 million people operating outside of traditional theism, which easily surpasses the entire population of Germany and France combined. Not very religious countries, by the way. In terms of sheer number of individuals, Asia concentrates much larger contingents of skeptics than most European nations... atheist brothers??? our answer??
>>18733797Christians are just coping about le atheists but they’re too afraid to answer this one
>>18733775>robust, solemn, and inwardly serious CatholicismIs moribund and increasingly carried by pandering to nons with shit like pentecostalism-lite and african bishops struggling to convince their congregations they are not in fact plagued by witcches
>>18733816>>18733775You're forgetting the best part, faggots. Atheism and philosophical materialism weren't born in Europe with the Enlightenment, but rather in the East, aka brown lands. Saarland has one of the oldest "schools" of atheism and materialism in human history—I'm not even kidding, read about the Cārvāka school, founded around the 6th century BC.
>>18733816>>18733775There's more christian indians than most countries in europe as well, so what?
>>18733826wait wait wait are you telling me that white atheists have actually been "larping as indians" this whole time??
>>18733826>saaar Bharat invented the enlightenment saaar
>>18733816some ideals of atheism and skepticism were adopted by great non-white activists and social reformers, such as Periyar. So I don't know why they think Europe stopped trying to convert people because they are doing it, but with materialist atheism, in this case.
>>18733835More or less. Yean>>18733832Cope, illiterate. Know your own history.Centuries before European thinkers began to draft the Enlightenment, ancient India had already developed the Cārvāka (or Lokāyata) school in the 6th century BC. Its atheism is as brown as Christianity, if not more so. The texts of the Cārvāka school categorically stated that direct sensory perception is the only valid source of knowledge and everything else was false. They rejected the authority of sacred scriptures, denied the existence of the soul, karma, and the afterlife, and even ridiculed religious rituals as frauds invented by priests to exploit the ignorant. Doesn't that sound familiar? I'm sorry, mate atheism is born brown, grew white, and will die brown again.
>>18733849>saaar we inventeded the atheism in the 6th BCE saar
>>18733827>There's more christian indians than most countries in europe as well, so what?Lol by pointing out that India has more Christians than most European countries, you have just destroyed your own initial argument that religiosity is independent of soil or race. If a religious minority like Indian Christianity makes Europe seem like a village, does the same principle apply to the more than 150 million non-religious and atheist Indians? There are more Indian atheists than entire European countries full of atheists. So what? There are almost three times more people without religion in India than Christians. If you use data from independent institutes like WIN-Gallup International, about 3% of Indians are convinced atheists and 13% are "non-religious." This gives about 16% of the population without religion, which today equates to about 220 million people. Christianity in India, even in higher independent estimates (which ironically accuse the census of underreporting), hovers around 5% of the population, approximately 70 million people. So what?
>>18733865ngl Indians are objectively higher IQ than Africans
>>18733856You're so desperate calling me an Indian that you can't even read my posts I'm saying you need to stop saying that the concept of materialistic atheism originated in the Enlightenment because it didn't. Go read a book or something
>>18733878>no saaar I am not Indian saaar but Bharat did the needful and founded the enlightenment in the days in Vishnu, bloody benchod bitch
>>18733865dependent* ops
>>18733889Do you actually think this hairy ass emaciated brown hand passes for anything but subcontinental?
>>18733892You lost. I'm probably whiter than you'll ever be. Show me your hand.
Damn. The OP got obliterated. I'd go to sleep after that.
>>18733894
>>18733892KEK he deleted it XD
>>18733892I don't know, I don't think talking about body hair is a valid argument because the volume of follicles in Europeans may even be higher in certain Mediterranean and Scandinavian populations.
>>18733896The OP mysteriously stopped responding when it was shown that atheism is a trademark of India. Suspicious, right?
>>18733897>He doesn't have the courage to send a picture of his AASI hand. Damn, I won again.
>>18733902You do not pass for "med", jeet. None of your countrymen do.
>>18733899Yes, why wouldn't I delete a picture of my hand here? That's against the rules. I just wanted to shut you up. So what? I'm white and you used pictures from the internet. Why are Indians pretending to be white?
>>18733909Ops meant to>>18733892
>>18733906>Deleted his brown slumdog hand out of shame Holy KEK
>>18733909>you?
>>18733910>I'm whiteYou don't even believe that. Hence why you clench your brown fist as hard as you can to make those boney jeet knuckles look as boney as possible
The funniest part is that after the OP didn't get an answer about atheism being ironically Indian, he's making a blatant same-flag and wasn't able to send a simple hand photo that takes less than 10 seconds. First my hand was brown, now I'm hiding it because it's bony, what's the next cope? That Indo-European languages came from India? Or that Ganesha is actually an avatar of Thor?
Damn, I found out who's been posting all those lame tradcath threads
>>18733715
>>18733938Unsurprising as intelligent people have more gay sex.
>>18733943>intelligent people>Atheist >>18733938LOL
>>18733943>intelligent people have more gay sex.You must be a genius.
>>18733957Yes.There is a direct correlation between irreligion and high IQ. Hence the correlation between religion, stupidity, and brownness.
>>18733961kek
>>18733943Most atheist take ever
Theo Sandfort (Dept of LGBT Studies, Utrecht University, Netherlands) did a study on Dutch atheist boys who had sex with older gay men, he says under atheist utilitarian ethics it was a positive experience
>>18733980>under atheist utilitarian ethics it was a positive experience
>>18733980Can you refute him tho?
>>18733715they still have souls, theyre just smaller. These people deserve a chance to be saved.
>>18733992Do they deserve a chance to immigrate to your country and marry your sister though?Christianity says YES
>>18734000>gay sex good>immigration bad
>>18734005Yes. And?
>>1873371539% of white Christiansagree with the statement: "I prefer that my closer relatives marry spouses from their same race." Atheists and agnostics are the least likely to disagree w/interracial marriage. White atheists don't care about racial purity.
>>18733849The dismissal has nothing to do with the west. In the west too, people will dismiss whatever you have shared as irrational.
>>18734007Why is immigration bad?
>>18734115Because non-whites pollute the genepool and degrade society. They primarily just serve to inflate the labour pool and depress wages while inflating prices through inflating demand. Which is why the ruling class wants as many of them as possible.
>>18734120You're fine with gay sex, but you draw the line at skin color?
>>18733964>Yes>assuming it's a Jensen effect.lol no retard from what I could see, 3 users massacred you here and one of them didn't even respond and now it's my turn. To begin, two large datasets comparing groups with different levels of religiosity show that their IQ differences are not based on the g factor and, including that rubbish you posted, should be attributed to specialized abilities. Most analyses of the specialized abilities in which religious and non-religious groups differ do not reveal a clear pattern or any gap between the two groups. Furthermore, an IQ test score is the sum of several subtests that measure specific cognitive abilities and will include those specific abilities. But that's where these articles you spam on Reddit are wrong; an adequate measure of g should ignore specific abilities. Answer me this: is the negative relationship between religion and IQ a Jensen effect? 1/3
>>18734133Yeah, nothing wrong with gay people having sex. Racial replacement of whites by browns however has deleterious effects that go far beyond mere skin colour, it is the primary cause of the enshittification of the west. All you are doing is exposing your own brownness.
>>18734134Strangely, I can find many studies testifying to the correlation between intelligence and irréligion. But absolutely none thst find the opposite correlation, no studies correlating religiosity with a higher IQ. What is up with that? Could religion be a grift for brown retards? It may just be.
>>18734145You didn't answered me, retard Specialized cognitive skills and test specifics are what actually define the results, playing a larger role in the observed ability differences than the g factor, when using ethnically similar populations. Why doesn't this occur when members of the same ethnic group are compared? There's no clear pattern regarding which specific cognitive abilities might drive IQ differences between different groups. The biggest differences seemed to occur in vocabulary, not to mention that the sampling in these studies is quite weak. In Steppan's 20 sample, the more religious group performed relatively better in mathematical reasoning. So, are religious people better at math?
>>18734150>>18734134This Indian guy doesn't know what you're talking about. Ask him if he knows what the Jensen effect is without using AI
>>18734150> no studies correlating religiosity with a higher IQ. What is up with that? Well? I love how Christgroids have no answer to this besides just attacking the concept of IQ itself like leftists confronted with the intellectual disparity between races.
>>18734152I realized he's retarded just by reading this shitty thread. This guy isn't responding to anyone, and it was good that he backtracked and stopped saying that atheism is white or something like that. He ran away and now he's talking about IQ and homosexuality.>>18734155You can't answer me? You're supposedly smarter than me because you masturbated while reading a post on some atheist page, okay, then you should be able to answer me. I'll try asking another way. These conclusions are only valid for comparisons *within the same population* where the differences in g would be relatively small. BUT if we compared different populations, such as between Middle Eastern Muslims and European Catholics, the differences would be in g. Specialized cognitive abilities and the specificities of ethnic groups play a larger role in the observed ability differences than the g factor in ethnically similar populations. Do you understand from here? And why do you think the negative relationship between religion and IQ is related to (g)? Are you retarded? g is probably the construct that best represents the hereditary components of intelligence.is the negative relationship between religion and IQ a Jensen effect? Yes or no? And why? No AI
>>18734172Forget about that Indian guy for a moment, what do you think of Miron Zuckerman?
>>18734172What you're dancing around, and yet pegging your argument on, is that atheists are more likely to be white (or Asian) and religious people are more likely to be black or brown and therefore low IQ. The resultant conclusion is the same, religion is more appealing to stupid people and less appealing to intelligent people. Your cope?
>>18734175>Miron ZuckermanIt depends on which study you're talking about. The garbage published in 2013. The original review faced serious criticism that atheists spammed in 2019. Zuckerman published a second meta-analysis of 83 studies. Although meta-analysis may sound seductive, there are methodological deficiencies that may compromise its central premise. And as I said above, the problem with it and these other studies is represented only by postmodern Western civilization and university culture **specifically**, excluding all of Asia, Latin America, and Africa.
>>18734178Here>>18734172Just answer the question. You can’t answer? >>18734178Zuckerman's study is one of the most well-cited and used meta-analysis, and the correlation of approximately -0.20 between intelligence and religious belief is very weak. To make it easier to understand for your retarded mind, the absence of any correlation would be 0.0. If the 50% most intelligent completely rejected religion and the 50% least intelligent completely embraced it, the correlation should be -1.0.
>>18734178>religion is more appealing to stupid peopleStupid in what regard? If it is intelligent to have gay sex, then everyone who reproduces is stupid.
>>18734196>atheists are more likely to be white (or Asian) and religious people are more likely to be black or brown and therefore low IQ.Yes or no?
>>18734200>if you don't believe in skydaddy then you be eating da poopoo Why are Christgroids so African?
>>18734203Scroll up to where the Anon said it is intelligent to have gay sex, and you will understand the context.
>>18734200>everyone who reproduces is stupid.There is a very strong demographic case to be made for this
>>18734212In that case, you ought to not reproduce.
