The Islamic model of the soul really is accurate, how can a religion produce such a remarkable scientific model yet at the same time the emergent sociology of Islamic states is really bad.
>>18734501>emergent sociology of Islamic statesWhich ines because they span multple continents and regions with radically different histories alongside how dubious calling them all "Islamic" is inherently since what they all only share in common is their faith.
>>18734501Looks Gnostic
>>18734501I don't even understand these mumbo-jumbo graphs with arrows posted here all the time.Can anyone explain?
>>18734501This is fucking retarded
>>18734510Islam with the Ummah and Fiqh aspect has basic statecraft built in, you can't fully divorce it from the religion itself.
>>18734528https://www.cambridgemuslimcollege.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/cmc_papers_9_v4.pdf
Psychophysical and spiritual are one in the same, saying this would get u burned alive back during 11th century islam. Of course now too, obviously now since some understand what that means. Actually back then they'd just force you to pay the jizyah and that's it.
>>18734610Jizya was only for abrahamics.
>>18734525All forms of asceticism inevitably resemble Gnostic hatred of matter and flesh
>>18734525There is no such thing as Gnostic. It's too broad a term.
>>18734501That pic is wrong. Concept of Spirit and Self are not enemies. That view seems christian or budist.
>>18735040It's Shaykh approved, maybe your interpretation is off
>>18734501>The Islamic model of the soul really is accurate,Have you independently verified it? What tests have you conducted on the soul to do it?>how can a religion produce such a remarkable scientific model No model of the soul is scientific. This is not meant to put them down, but they are not scientific. They are something else, philosophical, theological, etc.And frankly, what's so amazing about the idea there is a good part of you and a bad one? Christian nonsense and Judaism get more or less to the same point.>>18735040Buddhists don't believe in ''spirit". That's also an illusion.
>>18735151Science is not just natural science, the German term Wissenschaft is applicable here much like it is in Hegel's work.
>>18734501>>18734525>Looks GnosticLooks dualist
>>18734728It just means knowledgeIt means to knowIt’s not very broad at all
>>18735185The formal and social sciences are also meant to be replicable. My point here is it's not independently verifiable and as such only as accurate as the beholder feels/decides it is.
>>18735279Not all science can be replicable, it's a theory and you can argue in favor or against it. You can't independantly verify Hegel's Science of Logic
>>18735058I dont care. Muslims have not a pope or some kind of infalible religious leqder.>>18735151It could be. My point was saying that in islam we are not inherently bad. So the idea of the "self" and the "spirit" being enemies is compatible with christianism because the concept of original sin leads to believe our human nature is corrupt.I named budism because the have that kind of monk behavior too.
