>ruins your nation
but whose the best nomad group?
>>18735651>no berber conquests>no fulani jihad>no oromo expansion
>>18735651The Romans kicked the Nomads asses for a bit. They only really had a problem with the Huns, but even then they still fought them to a standstill to the point where Atilla literally threatened to ragequit by killing himself.
>>18735659Horse nomads would never realistically have conquered the core Roman provinces in Italy, Gaul and Spain due to the hostile terrain. Notice how in OPs map none of the nomadic empires have penetrated the Carpathian mountains or other similar mountainous/hilly terrain. The Ottomans, by the time they reached Vienna, were not nomadic in any shape or form, so they don't really count. The issue for Rome was the vast populations the Huns drove before them, which saturated Rome's borders.
>>18735860Magyars were nomads retard and they literally founded Hungary and raided all western Europe.
>>18735864True, but they settled in the Pannonian valley and stayed there - raiding is not the same as conquering or establishing a stable empire, otherwise the Vikings would have ruled half of Europe
>>18735651The ottomans and Mughals weren’t nomadic. A turkish(Anatolian peasants) who larps as a nomadic conqueror made this goofy map
>>18735651>Ottomans>NomadsCome on.
>>18736179He somehow thinks that Seljukids (who didn't go beyond Anatolia) are the same as Ottomans.
>>18736179It's a Turkish nationalist map. Notice how it only begrudgingly and secondarily refers to the Mongol Empire as the Mongol Empire lolPan-turk types always go >ermmmm the mongol empire may have been founded and ruled by mongols but much of its population was turkic therefore it was turkic empire!!!
>despite having 1/100th of your populationGraincels can never compete
>>18735651>Binds your soul & ruins your civilisationThis is the OG nomads and they are not even real.
>The great conqueror Timur built pyramids of the skulls of the people he killed after his victories. >The tallest of them had 70,000 skulls.thats pretty metal ngl
>In Uzbekistan, Timur is referred to as the "Founder of the Uzbek nation" despite having belonged to a competing tribe that hated the Uzbeks.lol
>>18736214They view Turkish/turkic identity as fluid as liberals view gender. They are always so shameless in their quest of stealing empires. For example, the khalji dynasty, is descended from a Turkic tribe(still debated if they’re of Turkic stock btw) that moved to Afghanistan in the 7th and became iranicized before ruling India in the 13th century. For them, that still a Turkic dynasty because of blood. On the other hand, Timur whose mongol ancestors only moved to Central Asia like a 100 years before he was born he’s a Turk because of “culture” and they suddenly forgot about blood. It’s black hebrew israelite tier pseudohistory.
>>18736440Central Asians are like that :/
>>18736575That's what I'm talking about. The same turk that insists the Mongol Empire was ultimately turkic because of its supposedly turkic majority among commoners will say that a culturally persian empire ruling over a bunch of indians was Turkic because its ruling class was descended from nomads lol
>>18735654Scythians
>>18735651
>>18735651none of these empire ever invented anything kind of weird i guess
