[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


shouldn't be mandatory for historian teachers to read primary sources from Mussolini, Gentile and Evola instead of reading interpretations for post WW2 rockefeller liberals?
If my way of thinking is correct, 98% of western historians are no better than the weakest AI
>>
>>18737801
Evola wtf lmao
>>
File: LeMagazine16mars41.jpg (406 KB, 1600x1241)
406 KB JPG
>>
>>18737801
Agree. They shouldn't do that.
>>
>>18738023
translation plz?
>>
OP should be executed for being so fucking retarded it's not even funny
>>
File: 23078_mainfoto_01.jpg (692 KB, 1169x1200)
692 KB JPG
Should they also read Pravda?

> Evola
Literally who.
>>
>>18738058
They should read Harvard and Rockefeller sponsored historians who barely read primary sources to the point of praising David Irving before the anti-semitic trial because David Irving with little money had the trouble to go to the archives for primary sources

Imagine writing a book about WW2 without even eye-witness but with 50% imagination and 50% AI tier garbage

What WW2 book is good? None. Not even the icebreaker theory is good.
>>
>Harvard and Cambridge authors are from the school analytical history which is a field where books are written in doing more than tell you what happened. It tries to explain why events happened, how different factors interacted, and what the available evidence allows us to conclude without primary sources, relying more on after the fact

kek
I want to learn chinese to see what their authors have written about WW2
>>
>>18738058
They already read pravda. That's where they got the 6 gorillion from. All the "extermination" camps were in newly conquered Soviet territory.
>>
>>18738963
That's just because the extermination camps were all in eastern europe
>>
File: 1776467178899.jpg (460 KB, 1176x1452)
460 KB JPG
>>18738994
>or so stalin told us
Lol. Lmao even
>>
>>18738997
The actual stalin narrative btw is that eastern european slavs (and primarily russians) were the primary victims of the Holocaust and that the jews received the better treatment
>>
File: 1776808493212.jpg (34 KB, 485x631)
34 KB JPG
>>18739014
>ack-shually goyim
Post that pic of the khazarette hanging from the tank barrel with her milkers out. That was another thing straight out of Stalin's playbook as were many other "authentic" pieces of "evidence"
Fucking tired of this shit



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.