>Be a homosexual Scottish King>Blame anti-monarchist sentiment on the Geneva Bible>Have your fellow gay court members censor and re-write the Geneva Bible to strip it of its anti-monarch sentiment>hundreds of years later, your gay, censored version of the Geneva Bible becomes central to the identity of thousands of schizophrenic Americans
>>18747131*yawn* Flames, hotter, next?
On a semi related note, why were so many kings in the British isles accused of being homos? Is there a lot of truth to that or is it mostly shit-talk?
>>18747229Catholic pederast projection.
>>18747229It's middle school tier gossip.>dude I heard he's gay!Then he is called "gaywad" by everybody and he has no way to disprove it.
Reminder that King James literally wrote a tract against pipesmoking.
>>Be a homosexualI don’t care how many fags claim he was gay, I don’t believe it.
>>18747229You have to be at least somewhat gay to want to wear these ridiculous, flaming outfits, let's be honest
>>18747307Same.
>>18747229In 1000 years you could count queer English kings on one hand, and maybe one or two 100% homo that died without issue. James had a wife and children so was able to at least get it up for baby making.
>>18747229Most of those accused of being fags fucked their wives and produced multiple children and even illegitimate children by mistresses. Then the evidence of them being fags is basically hearsay. Like Edward II. Accusations of him being a fag only came after his death as partial justification for his deposition and murder but the guy had four kids by his wife and then had an illegitimate son by an unknown mistress. Him being a fag is obviously bullshit but then modern “historians” latch onto it for political reasons.
>>18747414Many gay men have, and still do, have regular sex with women just to raise a family while they suck cocks on the side. It's hardly unprecedented
>>18747420You need more than just hearsay to prove these guys were gay. My evidence is that Edward II liked pussy enough to have kids and a mistress. Your evidence that he was gay is? A pop history “fact” regurgitated on reddit? Speculation? The gay men you’re talking about are found out. No one ever walked in on Edward II sucking cock or claimed to have any proof of him being gay.
>>18747131>King James was gayDid your rabbi tell you that? Reddit historians try to smear everyone as a faggot.
>>18747322That is insane drip. The ribbons are a bit fruity but the rest of it is incredible.
I read Douay-Rheims (DRC). But I won't be a subverting jew and condemn KJV readers to hellfire. New Testament is what matters the most, and they read the same version I do. I am ready to have respectful dialogue with KJV readers, but those who spam ai slop will be called hooknoses so beware
>>18747503Speculation that King James was gay predates Reddit, it started long before you were born in fact
KJVOnlyism is the most successful psyop of all time. It's obvious that subsequent monarchs started promoting the KJV to suppress anti-monarch sentiment in England at the time. This is also around the time the Crown was busy turning the Church of England into a state apparatus. It's why Americans separated Church from state to begin with, and here we are in 2026 and retards swear by this translation even though they have no reason to defend the British crown and aren't even British subjects anymore.
>>18747561>aren't even British subjects anymore.We should be though.
>>18747229Mostly shit talk from Indian colonial subjects
>>18747561It was probably the most common Bible people had when they started settling America, and it's what early American settlers quoted to each other, and thus what got passed down an idioms. There are several modern English idioms and adages which are derived from the KJV text in particular, not just the Bible generally. That lends it a kind of mystical authority in people's minds
>>18747420>ignoring the mistress partreading comprehension issue or just plain stupidity?
>>18747131slanderous defamation
>>18747503Same with Federick the Great
Fags are at least 2% of the male population. Makes sense there’d be a few faggot kings about. It also seems like powerful people are more prone to it
>>18748065This one actually was a fag
I don't know why people are so surprised over a few Monarchs being fags. Several Nazis were also gay. Homos are naturally attracted to authority
>>18748951King James wasn't a sodomite.
>>18748959King's can't be Sodomites anyways, but they can still be fags
>>18748965What about Mike Kabua?
>>18747578based loyalist
>>18748978He's apparently dead but nobody bothered updating his wikipedia page lmaohttps://en.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=1329&s=122900RIP bro
>>18748987Damn, I didn't know. End of an era. Enjoy burning, I guess.
