[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: download-2.jpg (803 KB, 2158x1217)
803 KB JPG
When did you realize Jehovah’s Witnesses preserved the original teachings of the first century Church ?
>>
>>18751380
I never realized that because it is not true. Have fun burning.
>>
>>18751383
Burning where ?
>>
>>18751380
I always bully you freaks when you show up at my house.
>>
>>18751386
Why do you hate us ?
>>
>>18751380
When I first read the Bible.
>>
>>18751388
Amen my brother
>>
>>18751387
I don't hate you, I just think you're pathetic.
>>
>>18751400
Obeying Jesus’ command to fulfill the great commission is pathetic ?
>>
>>18751380
Cherry picking. Why not Marcion, Montanus, or Cerinthus?
>>
>>18751404
Did Jesus affirm the Old Testament and worship the God of the Old Testament ? Did Jesus become flesh and truly died ?
>>
>>18751404
Why not John, Paul, George, or Ringo?
>>
>>18751402
Being a doorknocking cuck who lets himself get humiliated by randos is pathetic.
>>
>>18751380
>non trinitarian
Worshiping discarnate devils can not save you from hell and belief in after death fantasy lands is rejection of salvation in Christ. You may as well be noahide, because that is what jews created your denomination to be, and calling yourself Christian is asinine.
>>
>>18751410
Why ?

>>18751411
Whom did Jesus worship ?
>>
>>18751408
You assumed that Christianity was corrupted, but only in those details that contradict your opinion. What if the Gospels are corrupted and except Marcion's, which didn't have the bodily resurrection?
>>
>>18751411
Jesus was unitarian.
>>
>>18751417
>Why ?
I could knock your teeth out, order you to pick them up and you'd thank me for letting you keep them.
>>
>>18751418
Why would God let his Bible be corrupted ?

>>18751420
Didn’t you just say you don’t hate us ?
>>
>>18751426
>Didn’t you just say you don’t hate us ?
I don't, I just think you're pathetic.
>>
>>18751426
>Why would God let his Bible be corrupted ?
God works in mysterious ways. For example, the Johannine Comma happened.
>>
>>18751430
And we know it’s a corruption, correct ?
>>
>>18751419
>>18751417
The name of God was given to the children of God for their salvation in Christ, the one true living God. You can call your discarnate devil whatever you want and worship it all you want but doing so will profit you nothing because ultimately all you're doing is denying that the veil tore and denying the Spirit.
>>
>>18751420
That's a felony.
>>
>>18751434
>Christ, the one true living God
Chapter and verse. King James.
>>
>>18751434
Who did Jesus worship though ?
>>
>>18751431
God allowed it, and it was considered true for centuries. So, yes, God did allow corrupting the Bible.
>>
>>18751441
And we know it’s a corruption, correct ?
>>
>>18751440
The Father
>>
>>18751443
What's his name ?
>>
>>18751437
1 Corinthians 12
Romans 12
Ephesians 1
Colossians 1
Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular.
>>
>>18751440
The hand does not worship the head.
>>
>>18751442
Yes, we know. God allowed the corruption. It became known through comparison of different versions. So, some Luke fragments have the Lord's prayer identical to Marcion's version. Gregory of Nyssa while talking about the Gospel of Luke cited Marcion's version of the prayer.
>>
>>18751444
The Father
>>
>>18751446
Where's the verse that says "Christ, the one true living God"?
>>
>>18751447
So Jesus does not worship God ?

>>18751449
>It became known through comparison of different versions

Exactly! Do the Gospels we have today match the majority of manuscripts we have ?

>>18751453
So he doesn’t have a name ?
>>
>>18751435
Does that mean you'd be less of a cuck for thanking me for letting you keep your knocked out teeth? lol
>>
>>18751457
Read the Gospel. What name are you looking for specifically? If you find it in the Gospel, let me know. He says Elohi or Eli on the Cross. Do you worship El?
>>
>>18751384
First in the center of the earth, then in outer darkness.
>>
>>18751468
What does Deuteronomy 6:4 say ?
>>
>>18751472
>read the Gospel
>what does Deutoronomy say?
Are you circumcised?
>>
>>18751468
El means God in Hebrew. Do I worship God ? Yes.
>>
>>18751475
Why are you trying to change the subject ?
>>
>>18751472
It says that the generation of 1914 shall not pass away.
>>
>>18751464
It's better than being someone's bitch in prison, brother.
>>
>>18751476
Good then. That's God's name. Jesus also says Father, do you deny it?
>>
File: 1762787289069.jpg (54 KB, 377x661)
54 KB JPG
>>18751479
Yes/no answer
Otherwise we can't proceed
>>
>>18751480
They are in heaven, so they will not pass away

What Deuteronomy 6:4 say please ?
>>
>>18751457
>Do the Gospels we have today match the majority of manuscripts we have ?
Manipulation. The orthodoxy promoted their own versions of the Gospels, while supressing the others. And we have the traces. Jerome, for example, mentioned that many versions of the Mark didn't have the ending. Eusebius wrote that almost all copies of Mark ended with the afraid women. So, there were many manuscripts of Mark with the short ending. Do you know how many found? 3.
>>
>>18751482
It's not an either or. I'm not anyone's bitch in prison but you would thank me for letting you keep your teeth after I knocked them out.
>>
>>18751485
God and Father are titles. He has a name. What is it ? You have a clue in Deuteronomy 6:4, what does it say ?

>>18751489
> Jerome, for example, mentioned that many versions of the Mark didn't have the ending. Eusebius wrote that almost all copies of Mark ended with the afraid women. So, there were many manuscripts of Mark with the short ending

And we know all of this, correct ?
>>
>>18751488
>They are in heaven, so they will not pass away
Lmao new cope just dropped.
>>
>>18751492
>And we know all of this, correct ?
Your argument was that the Gospel matches most found manuscripts. I've demonstrated this argument is invalid. Correct?
>>
>>18751496
But we know all this, correct ?
>>
File: read.png (1.05 MB, 802x926)
1.05 MB PNG
>>18751454
I gave you some verses which explain that Christ is the one true living God, different than the discarnate devils you worship. Denying that Christ rose from the earth as the one true living God, denying the resurrection, is unwise.
>>
>>18751490
>I'm not anyone's bitch in prison
But you will be with that attitude.
>>
>>18751500
>Christ is the one true living God
None of those chapters say that. You're distorting Matthew 16:16 and John 17:3.

"And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent."
John 17:3 KJV

"And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God."
Matthew 16:16 KJV
>>
>>18751501
What attitude? The fact that I think you're a cuck because if I were to knock your teeth out and tell you to pick them up, you'd thank me for letting you keep them? Sorry, but every man who's not a cuck would agree with me.
>>
>>18751498
You afraid to answer my question? You argument is invalid, correct? God can allow corrupting of the bible, correct?
BTW, even though Jerome and Eusebius admitted many manuscripts had the short ending, Jerome still included the long ending in Vulgate, and Eusebius considered the long ending true.
>>
>>18751504
If you were to knock a harmless JW's teeth out you'd find yourself behind bars "agreeing" with another man's dick in your mouth.
>>
>>18751505
Where is the long ending here ? I can’t see it https://www.jw.org/en/library/bible/nwt/books/mark/16/
>>
>>18751507
I am not going to assault random people because I'm not ratarded. Doesn't change the fact that you're still a cuck because if I were to knock your teeth out and tell you to pick them up, you'd thank me for letting you keep them.
>>
>>18751509
Wow, cool. Tell me why it isn't there. Like, why wasn't it included.
>>
>>18751510
>I am not going
>if I were
kwab
>>
>>18751514
>jwcuck does not understand conditionals
>this is somehow an own
lmao
>>
>>18751516
>I-I am not going
>i-if I were
All talk and no bite. You're more likely to have your teeth kicked in by the JW.
>>
>>18751519
>but I did have breakfast though
This is the kind of intellect you need to possess to be a JW (in additional to being a cuck).
>>
>>18751521
It takes balls to knock on random people's doors and spread your faith. Not so much to be an internet tough guy on an anonymous website.
>>
>>18751492
>He has a name
I already answered based on the Gospel. Do you deny it?
>>
File: Greg-Doucette-Bio.jpg (1.09 MB, 3000x2858)
1.09 MB JPG
>>18751524
It takes a cuck to thank someone for letting you keep your teeth that he knocked out.
You're meekmaxxed.
>>
>>18751509
JW:
>There's no long ending in the Gospel!
also JW:
>Our Gospel matches the majority of the manuscripts!
This is incorrect. Most manuscripts have the long ending.
>>
>>18751527
>that he knocked out
Who's he?
>>
>>18751531
Let's say it's some random crackhead. You'll thank him for letting you keep the teeth that he knocked out.
>>
>>18751533
>Let's say it's (not me)
kwab
>>
>>18751534
>JW doubles down on not understanding conditionals
>unironically believes "if I were to" means "I am going to"
Your lack of reading comprehension is your shield.
>>
>>18751537
The JW is willing to get punched and humiliate himself for his faith. You can't even threaten someone online without retracting your words. It's evident who's pathetic here.
>>
>>18751540
The JW is such a cuck that he won't defend himself and will let himself get humiliated. He also doesn't understand conditionals and considers them threats because his IQ is low enough to get filtered by the breakfast question.
>>
>>18751544
I understood your meme just fine, you're only hypothetically able to knock another man's teeth out.
>>
>>18751503
Go ahead and justify your worship of a devil by denying Christ, but it will not save you or the children of God from hell. Denying that the veil tore, and that the body of Christ rose from the earth as the one true living God is the antithesis of christianity, but you are a fool noahide that does the will of jews which is that you die.
>>
>>18751546
>JW doesn't understand the difference between the ability to knock another man's teeth out and assaulting random people like a retarded crackhead
That makes sense given that there's no possible situation in which you'd knock another man's teeth out on account of your meekness.
>>
>>18751383
Why do we keep replying to your troll ass? Go back to your bridge.
>>
>>18751550
>I-I could knock your teeth out
>L-Let's say it's some random crackhead
kwab
>>
>>18751387
You come to my door, preach the bare minimum nonsense then ask for a donation. At least you leave me to cool pamphlets
>>
>>18751552
>if you're not going to assault me like a retarded crackhead, you're a bitch
Not sure if that fits in with your moral code, meekbro.
>>
>>18751554
That's your moral code.
>>
>>18751557
When did I say that? Direct quote, please.
>>
>>18751380
What I got have to now ask that is here and are now the Yahovah’s Witnesses a sect of the Seventh Day Advent Calendarists
>>
>>18751559
You're the one saying you could punch people for knocking on your door.
>>
>>18751562
>triples down on not understanding conditionals
Ok so you can't give me a direct quote showing that's my moral code lol.
>>
>>18751564
You had to backpedal from "I could" to "Let's say a crackhead" when you realized you weren't in fact capable of knocking someone's teeth out.
>>
>>18751447
Jesus said in Revelation 3:12 when he had already ascended:
>The one who is victorious I will make a pillar in the temple of MY GOD. Never again will they leave it. I will write on them the name of MY GOD and the name of the city of MY GOD, the new Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from MY GOD; and I will also write on them my new name.

So he was given even a new name yet you know the name of God never changes as per Exodus 3:15:
>This is my name forever, my name to remember for all generations.

So even the name Jesus it its the true name of the Messiah of the gospels won't be important because he now has a new name that nobody yet knows.
>>
>>18751566
>he doesn't understand English
I had to change it from "I could" to "if I were to" because I realized you think the former means "I am going to" because you're a complete retard.
>>
>>18751569
You had to change it because you're a bitch, anon.
>>
>>18751571
You think not assaulting random people like a retarded crackhead makes you a bitch?
>>
>>18751512
Sure, here is the translator’s notes in the link I gave you:

"According to the earliest available manuscripts of the last part of Mark, the Gospel ends with the words found in verse 8. Some assert that such an ending is too abrupt to have been the original conclusion to the book. However, in view of Mark’s generally terse writing style, that assertion is not necessarily valid. Also, fourth-century scholars Jerome and Eusebius indicate that the authentic record closes with the words “for they were in fear.”

There are a number of Greek manuscripts and translations into other languages that add either a long or a short conclusion after verse 8. The long conclusion (consisting of 12 extra verses) is found in Codex Alexandrinus, Codex Ephraemi Syri rescriptus, and Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis, all from the fifth century C.E. It also appears in the Latin Vulgate, the Curetonian Syriac, and the Syriac Peshitta. However, it does not appear in two earlier fourth-century Greek manuscripts, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, or in Codex Sinaiticus Syriacus of the fourth or fifth century, or in the earliest Sahidic Coptic manuscript of Mark of the fifth century. Similarly, the oldest manuscripts of Mark in Armenian and Georgian end at verse 8.

Certain later Greek manuscripts and translations into other languages contain the short conclusion (consisting of just a couple of sentences). The Codex Regius of the eighth century C.E. has both conclusions, giving the shorter conclusion first. It prefaces each conclusion with a note saying that these passages are current in some quarters, though it evidently recognizes neither of them as authoritative."

Does that answer your question ?
>>
Man, I don't like the trinity but everything else is biblically unsound. Come back when you've found something two thousand years hasn't ripped apart.
>>
>>18751553
JWs never ask for donations. They give litterature for free
>>
>>18751572
That's what you think, otherwise you wouldn't have said you could do it. I wouldn't assault people for knocking on my door.
>>
>>18751576
>he doesn't understand conditionals
>again
lmao
Btw the funniest part is that I'm calling you a cuck because you wouldn't retaliate in response to assault. Not because you wouldn't assault random people like a retarded crackhead.
That's why you can't directly quote me and prove I believe the utter retardation that you claim I believe.
>>
>>18751579
But you said you could assault and the JW would be a cuck for not retaliating. Then you switched to a random crackhead when you realized you couldn't actually do it and your "conditional" only made you look bad.
>>
>>18751575
I've had them ask me for anything I can give right at my door.
>>
>>18751586
I said that because I didn't realize you're a retard who does not understand conditionals. I switched to the random crackhead because I figured that would be more understandable to someone who does not understand conditionals.
So in that way it's both an indictment of your character and your reading comprehension.
>>
>>18751388
Don’t you believe that I am in the Father?
>>
>>18751587
Never happened, those were prob 7th day adventists
>>
>>18751590
That's a lot of cope.
>>
>>18751591
In John 17 Jesus asks the Father that the disciples may be one in them too.
>>
>>18751598
Yeah from you lmao.
>>
>>18751601
>no u
kwab
>>
>>18751603
Yeah surely I'm a bitch because I'm not a retarded crackhead and because I understand conditionals.
Here, I'll give you one more for the road:
>If you knocked my teeth out, I'd return the favour.
Not something a guy like you can say.
>>
>>18751573
No. Jerome admitted many manuscripts had short endings, yet he added the version with long ending into Vulgate. Irenaeus explicitly supported the long ending. Funny that he's used in the op pic as an example of the true Christianity.
>>
>>18751596
Nope, watchtower people.
>>
>>18751609
You were dreaming
>>
>>18751608
The Holy Spirit has revealed to us the truth
>>
>>18751607
You're a bitch because you don't stand by your word. The JW practice what they preach, you only knock teeths out in your mind.
>>
>>18751611
AHAHAHAHA
I accept your concession. Or are you just larping as the JW anon?
>>
>>18751613
Quote where I said I'm going to knock your teeth out, jwcuck.
>b-but I did have breakfast this morning!
lmao
>>
>>18751617
You can't knock anyone's teeth out, not even hypothetically.
>>
>>18751619
Ok do you concede that line and your last resort is
>actually y-you're physically weak!
lol
It's over meekbro, time to pack up the magazines and move on.
>>
>>18751616
I'm at work we will discuss another time
>>
>>18751621
I didn't say anything about you being physically weak. The JW simply has the balls you don't have.
>>
>>18751625
>you don't have balls because you don't act like a retarded crackhead
The jw masterminds are at it again.
>>
This thread has become retarded, time to hide
>>
>>18751627
I didn't say that either. See >>18751540
>>
>>18751631
When did I threaten you? Direct quote. And remember, lying is a sin and Jehovah God is watching.
>>
>>18751633
I'm not the JW.
>>
The trinity was a mistake.
>>
JWanon has been slacking on the OC lately
>>
>>18751641
My tablet is broken :(
>>
>>18751567
>The one who is victorious I will make a pillar in the temple of MY GOD. Never again will they leave it. I will write on them the name of MY GOD and the name of the city of MY GOD, the new Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from MY GOD; and I will also write on them my new name.

This is the living body of Christ, the one true God, formed by the children of God in Christ. The name of God was given to the children of God for their salvation in Christ.

This is literally Christianity 101.
>>
>>18751548
>the body of Christ rose from the earth as the one true living God
Chapter and verse. King James.
>>
>>18751380
When did you realise that the Jehovah's Witnesses has falsely prophesied the date of the end times about 50 different times, and also banned blood transfusions for decades leading to countless deaths of their own membership, only to then reverse their position on the topic?
>>
Ἐγείρεσθε ἄγωμεν ἐντεῦθεν
Ego Noah thee.
Rise up; let us drive away from this setting.

Free will and fate, they don't relate,
but both exist, and so I state.
All the world is paradox.
If you have the keys, unlock the locks.
>>
>>18751777
Holy trips



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.