Have evangelicals contributed anything of positive value to the world in human history?
>>18755521Yes. Next?
>>18755535Such as?
>>18755565Saving people from Hell.
>>18755566>Saving people from Hell.How does that work, in your mind?
I'm of the opinion that the Church may have done some good But Evangelists? Naw, they objectively make the world a worse place to live. I don't even think it's fair to call these people human beings, most of them seem to be more plastic than flesh.
>>18755521Yes. They gave you law & order.
>>18755571Jews were the original legalists and they don't evangelize
>>18755521Enlisted men.
>>18755521No. They are the goyim defense force for Israel and for pedophilesEpstein wouldn't have gotten anywhere without their help
>>18755521They are exceedingly efficient at separating fools from their money.
>>18755567Step 1: I give an unsaved person the gospel.Step 2: They believe it and call upon the name of the Lord.Step 3: They are born again of the spirit and will never go to Hell.Any questions?>>18755570>the CHVRCHEnjoy burning.
>>18755582>Step 3: They are born again of the spirit and will never go to Hell.Hey I saw one of you at my local downtown a few months back and they told me the same thing. I even said a prayer with them. I still went back home to get high and jack off though but I'm glad I'm saved from Hell
>>18755587>I even said a prayer with them.Did you believe though?
>>18755521no, they are retarded fools, dispensationalists who have rejected salvation in Christ
>>18755582>Any questions?Yes obviously. You're begging the question in every post. >Step 1: I give an unsaved person the gospel.Which edition of "the gospel" from which time period? They haven't remained the same over time; Church Fathers made changes and additions which weren't there when they were originally written. There are multiple versions of the bible as well. So which version are you talking about, exactly?>Step 2: They believe it and call upon the name of the Lord.How do you verify whether they believe it or not? What process of verification did you apply yourself, to the bible, its authors, and their stories? Truth isn't 'just a vibe that you feel' but do you have anything else to show for that?>Step 3: They are born again of the spirit and will never go to Hell.How were you convinced of these rules, when you have no process of verification at any point during these steps?
>>18755594>You're begging the question in every post.Rat Dyer fan, I take it.>Which edition of "the gospel" from which time period?You're retarded. The gospel has always been that salvation comes by faith in Jesus. But I use the King James Bible exclusively.>How do you verify whether they believe it or not? By asking them a series of questions about the gospel, and then asking them if they believe it. Obviously it's possible someone could lie to me; I can't read people's minds. But if they're lying and they go to the pit, that's their problem. It doesn't change the mechanism of salvation, you do realize. Well, you have a worthless brain, so maybe not. But you know.>How were you convinced of these rulesBy reading the Bible and listening to Biblical preaching. Enjoy Orthorat Hell.
>>18755571>>18755575lmao. Both of you are wrong and this isn't even the earliest known system from that area.
>>18755570I wish I could flay Copeland and Osteen alive.
>>18755521I’ll give them credit for helping revive social conservatism after its 60s-70s limbo, other Christian groups have followed their lead.
>>18755521having those global networking interactions making American culture the standard instead of how it used to be which was draft into dying for Jews. Questions?
No, never. They are an albatross around the neck of America
No. They must be annihilated.
>>18755616>But I use the King James Bible exclusively.Ah yes the most infallible and perfect version of:cult nonsense spoken in Aramaic 2000 years ago, written in Greek by Jewish hands, transliterated 4 times in 4 different languages until eventually in 17th century an English version (KJV) was created. Retains none of the original content from Jesus's actual ministry. I have read the bible, and I study history. That's how I know you're a retard larper.Jesus never wrote anything which means he contributed nothing to the bible that you believe in today. Enjoy your ongoing psychosis
>>18755641Funnily enough while law and order was being written down, Jews couldn't vibe with the language (Sumerian). So as a matter of fact in the ancient world, Jews were the LEAST LIKELY group of people you would ever find presiding over legal matters. They struggled and failed so hard to learn Sumerian cuneiform in Babylon, because of how vastly different it was to their native Semitic language, that they gave up and wrote cope propaganda about the empire instead. >muh tower of babel and king Nimrod!It's actually really funny when put in perspective. Biggest sore losers in history, the Jews. Invented nothing but propaganda about their own history
Politically they're a highly motivated right wing voting bloc which is good if you're a right wing politician. That said, entwining yourself so deeply with A the secular unstable state of Israel and B a local ephemeral political movement like MAGA is long-term going to accelerate irreligion in future generations
>>18755587I've had a similar experience with these wackos. But they quickly ran away when I counteroffered to teach them how pray the Rosary
>>187555751. jews are not the original legalists, not even close2. Several ancient Ivdaean sects used to proselytize aggressively. Talmudic jews don't proselytize for obvious reasons . Not sure why you would say 'evangelize' given that the Gospel was spread by Christians.
