[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: xzxc.jpg (46 KB, 640x339)
46 KB JPG
Discussion and why did the Rus' have such success even more advanced powers did not
>>
>>18756080
Slavs are destined to attrition warfare as long no decisive battle is to be won by their opponents they're likely to win long term. Turkics rely on their raiding to intimidate people unused to attrition warfare.
>>
>>18756080
Everyday slavs with less paleobalkan ancestry being better gets proven
>>
>>18756080
The rus fought in the samemanner as the turkics most of their armies consisted of light cavalry and horse archers.
Specifically to fight the turkics



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.