[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_2092.jpg (87 KB, 640x635)
87 KB JPG
Have beautiful people always been better off historically speaking? Were uglies ever treated good?

Post history on good looking people or on ugly people.
>>
File: IMG_2088.jpg (104 KB, 727x900)
104 KB JPG
Even computers agree
>>
>>18756374
Yes. You can spout totally false bullshit with good looks and rizz, and people will lap that shit up. Try the same as an ugly dude with a nerd voice and that shit doesn’t work.
>>
File: IMG_4461.jpg (61 KB, 480x640)
61 KB JPG
>>18756374
yes, there’s a reason why most evil humanoid creatures in mythology are repulsive looking. Also I think you should take this thread to /lit/ for better answers
>>
CHIWIWI



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.